Don’t disagree, but it’s still better than Pitt vs MSU.
He’s not much without Walker, and neither is MSU.Thorne might as well be wearing a Pitt jersey tonight.
I agree 100Pitt has a good O line and D line, thats where it starts.
he's really not goodHe’s not much without Walker, and neither is MSU.
Good call lmaoThis will be the first real team the pitters have played all year. I'm expecting that MSU will win by a lopsided score of something like 48 - 14. If both Pickett and Ken Walker played then the score would be something like 62 - 28 in favor of MSU. We will see what happens in a few hours.
If the pitters can make a game of it then it indicates that maybe they really have a decent team and aren't a fraud with a good record resulting from playing 13 cupcakes.
Pitt would’ve scored about 35 to 40 points in this game with Pickett. Just look at how bad MSU was late in the season when Walker faded. Oh well, Tucker will just bring in another batch of free agents. Let’s not forget that he basically did nothing with Colorado’s program.its a shame that Michigan State is missing its one good player
Pitt is missing plenty lolits a shame that Michigan State is missing its one good player
they are, the biggest being PickettPitt is missing plenty lol
I’m sure the Pitt board cares.Pitt is missing plenty lol
The real question is why go for two.how does Payton Thorne not understand that its a two point conversion and the ball HAS to get into the end zone? there was no chance that Heyward was going to get in, you're better off putting it up for grabs in the end zone
well yes, another good question, but given the decision to go for two your quarterback has to know what that entailsThe real question is why go for two.
Did the MSU kicker miss some kicks tonight?well yes, another good question, but given the decision to go for two your quarterback has to know what that entails
He did miss a close FG early in the gameDid the MSU kicker miss some kicks tonight?
I can't stand these constant personal stories about players, coaches, mascots etc
not to mention they incorrectly called it a double reverse, which irks meI agree. And is ESPN getting paid a commission for every person they show in the stands? It's non-stop people in the stands. The game is an afterthought. In the late 3rd, Addision had a great run on a reverse and I thought, damn, I want to see that again, and instead all I got was a graphic of Pickett and the USC QB transfer coming into Pitt next year. IOW, instead of a replay of an amazing play, I got a story about two guys that aren't playing in the game I'm watching.
The real question is why go for two.
these announcers forgot that Michigan St was terrible against the pass most of the year
lol it only took facing a third stringerAnd the irony is that they get the INT...