But there may be a "student athletic fee," or whatever they call it, in your son's tuition.My son attends a mid-major. All athletic events are free for students with ID including football.
LMAOROFL you never grew up in a poor family.Student tickets are already well under market value as evidenced by how quickly they sell out, and how they are able to fetch over face value on the secondary market…not really any reason to make them free, as that would make it even tougher for those who want them most to get them.
That's possible. They break down certain fees such as meals and dorm but I never saw such a line item fee for athletics. It could all be baked in, and probably is.But there may be a "student athletic fee," or whatever they call it, in your son's tuition.
My activity fee coveted all sports and was about $40/term. Why should students be forced to pay the salaries of players? Bullspit.That's possible. They break down certain fees such as meals and dorm but I never saw such a line item fee for athletics. It could all be baked in, and probably is.
How many kids on campus this year do you think missed out on football games due to the cost of the ticket (the face value cost that is)?LMAOROFL you never grew up in a poor family.
I don't disagree.My activity fee coveted all sports and was about $40/term. Why should students be forced to pay the salaries of players? Bullspit.
They aren’t “forced” to…however, they have the opportunity to buy a ticket for well below market value if they’d like to attend….not to mention of course that they aren’t paying their “salaries”.My activity fee coveted all sports and was about $40/term. Why should students be forced to pay the salaries of players? Bullspit.
The nominal fee that is charged for basketball certainly isn’t hurting attendance…had tickets been free this season, I doubt you would have seen much if any change.In the early 70's we payed for football tickets, however, b-ball and other sports I believe were free with a student ID. I see no reason why that could not happen today as a way to pack the BJC for b-ball.
I don't know what nominal is. Making them free should not make much difference then to the bottom line but could put more fannies in the seats. There is reason to be optimistic about b-ball. Why not encourage the students to support their team.The nominal fee that is charged for basketball certainly isn’t hurting attendance…had tickets been free this season, I doubt you would have seen much if any change.
They were $5/game in the mid-90s, and are cheaper than that today (in 21-22, they were just over $2/game…do you think that keeps anyone at all from going, especially when there are benefits that offset a lot of that minimal fee).I don't know what nominal is. Making them free should not make much difference then to the bottom line but could put more fannies in the seats.
I went to PSU from 85-89. Natty years for football. Neither me nor my friends knew what basketball was (figuratively) or cared. I attended one game in Rec Hall and it was free. That was my fault but there was no juice around bball at the time. I got into it long after I graduated.I don't know what nominal is. Making them free should not make much difference then to the bottom line but could put more fannies in the seats. There is reason to be optimistic about b-ball. Why not encourage the students to support their team.
According to gopsu, 11 student tickets cost $50 for the 22-23 season. Show up with an ID and get in. Why make it a pain in the butt, just show up.They were $5/game in the mid-90s, and are cheaper than that today (in 21-22, they were just over $2/game…do you think that keeps anyone at all from going, especially when there are benefits that offset a lot of that minimal fee).
Because $4-something a game adds up I guess and somebody has to show a gain on the sheets.According to gopsu, 11 student tickets cost $50 for the 22-23 season. Show up with an ID and get in. Why make it a pain in the butt, just show up.
It is the principal. College sports are for the students, not the professionals that we have made the players. I am not the only one sick about the new professional league, the NCAA. No one goes to swimming meets. Can you imagine NIL for swimmers? LMAOROFL or baseball at PSU with few fans and little success?Because $4-something a game adds up I guess and somebody has to show a gain on the sheets.
It is the principal. College sports are for the students, not the professionals that we have made the players. I am not the only one sick about the new professional league, the NCAA. No one goes to swimming meets. Can you imagine NIL for swimmers? LMAOROFL or baseball at PSU with few fans and little success?
Im sure they’d rather not open and staff those sections for 10 kids to sit in them.Why not offer the upper seats at the BJC (that are usually empty) to students for free and they can pay if they wanna sit lower
But you're not sure if 10 kids or a whole lot more would show upIm sure they’d rather not open and staff those sections for 10 kids to sit in them.
I'm quite sure...the cost of tickets is not a barrier for getting students to show up. Over the past two seasons, the average ticket price was just over $3. In 2023 (and with the Penn State student population), that cost isn't keeping anyone away. As I mentioned, they were $5/game over 20 years ago, and that price didn't discourage a single person that I knew from going to games that was interested (and that was at a time when PSU students were living on much tighter budgets than you'll see today).But you're not sure if 10 kids or a whole lot more would show up
There's a disconnect here. The money raised for NIL is private money, not public money or the schools. I fail to see how the efforts to accumulate private funds to pay players has anything to do with how the institutions charge students for admission.With the billions being raised to pay NIL money to players, how about using some of this money to make student tickets free. We payed a small activity fee I'm 1963-67, which covered all sports.
the ticket prices have nothing to do with student attendance at the BJC.Why not offer the upper seats at the BJC (that are usually empty) to students for free and they can pay if they wanna sit lower
Hey white bread. It’s not 1963. PSU was on national TV maybe once a year. Revenue came from ticket sales and Levi Lamb contributions. Tuition was $525.With the billions being raised to pay NIL money to players, how about using some of this money to make student tickets free. We payed a small activity fee I'm 1963-67, which covered all sports.
Wrong, Mary claimed in a previous thread that she paid thousands for tuition back in the 60s.Hey white bread. It’s not 1963. PSU was on national TV maybe once a year. Revenue came from ticket sales and Levi Lamb contributions. Tuition was $525.
must've gone to school for the entire decadeWrong, Mary claimed in a previous thread that she paid thousands for tuition back in the 60s.
If you get rid of the athletic fee at the D-I Level then it will trickle down.
Lower D-1, D-II, and D-III couldn't survive without the student fe
My tuition was 1450/ term for all expenses years, about $4500 total. My mom and dad both worked for the railroad. Could never be done today. I owed about $5000 when I graduated.Wrong, Mary claimed in a previous thread that she paid thousands for tuition back in the 60s.
must've gone to school for the entire decade
Hank you. Priceless.@Marylovesthelions
Wonderful digital of the 67' year book...
Link: https://digital.libraries.psu.edu/digital/collection/lavie/id/44506/
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()