“Comparing the modern warming to reference levels at the end of the Little Ice Age about 150 years ago does not really make much sense because this period represents one of the coldest times of the past 10,000 years.
The choice of a baseline near the lower extreme of a variable parameter is uncommon in science.
The Little Ice Age that ended around 1850 AD does not represent a suitable reference level for the 20th and early 21st century warming as
it fails basic scientific baseline criteria.
The choice of a baseline near the lower extreme of a variable parameter is uncommon in science.
The Little Ice Age that ended around 1850 AD does not represent a suitable reference level for the 20th and early 21st century warming as
it fails basic scientific baseline criteria.
The study that was published on 12 December 2017 in the journal ‘Frontiers in Earth Science’
reminds policymakers, scientists and the public that
the “pre-industrial” times cited in the Paris Agreement involve a dynamic alternation of warm and cold phases which need to be viewed in context.
the “pre-industrial” times cited in the Paris Agreement involve a dynamic alternation of warm and cold phases which need to be viewed in context.
======
New study puts the 1.5°C and 2.0°C temperature limits of the Paris Agreement into a historical climate context
The Paris Agreement adopted in December 2015 during the COP21 climate conference
stipulates that the increase in the global average temperature is to be
kept well below 2°C above “pre-industrial levels” and that
efforts are pursued to limit the temperature increase to 1.5°C above “pre-industrial levels.”
efforts are pursued to limit the temperature increase to 1.5°C above “pre-industrial levels.”
Closer inspection of the treaty text, however, reveals that the term “pre-industrial levels” is nowhere defined in this epochal UN-document, that has meanwhile been ratified by 170 Parties.
This is particularly odd because the
“pre-industrial” temperatures of the past 10,000 years have varied quite significantly,
as meticuloulsy documented by hundreds of paleoclimate studies.
“pre-industrial” temperatures of the past 10,000 years have varied quite significantly,
as meticuloulsy documented by hundreds of paleoclimate studies.
Puzzled by this apparent gap in the Agreement, Fritz Vahrenholt went out and researched the history of the temperature limit definition. The former renewable energy manager and current head of the German Wildlife Foundation was surprised to find that the initial description of this important climate goal dates back to the mid 1970s, proposed by an economist, by the name of William Nordhaus. Nordhaus’ idea was as simple as effective:
He looked at the maximum temperatures recorded
during the past several hundred thousand years and
warned that this natural range should not be exceeded in the future.
Two decades later, in 1995, the German Advisory Council for Global Change further refined this concept, but kept Nordhaus’ original idea of a tolerable ‘temperature window’.
during the past several hundred thousand years and
warned that this natural range should not be exceeded in the future.
Two decades later, in 1995, the German Advisory Council for Global Change further refined this concept, but kept Nordhaus’ original idea of a tolerable ‘temperature window’.
Vahrenholt:
“Unfortunately this important palaeoclimatological perspective was lost in subsequent key papers on the subject that paved the way to the Paris Agreement.
Reports by the World Bank and United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) in 2014 and 2015 narrowed their view to the last 200 years which does not do justice to the enormous natural temperature fluctuations on a multi-millennial perspective.”
In order to better understand the complex pre-industrial temperature history of the past, Vahrenholt teamed up with Sebastian Lüning, a professional resources geologist who in his sparetime works on paleoclimatological studies with the Switzerland-based Institute for Hydrography, Geoecology and Climate Sciences. Lüning researched the literature and integrated the Paris Agreement 2.0°C and 1.5°C temperature limits into the climate development of the past 2000, 10,000 and 120,000 years.
Lüning:
“Comparing the modern warming to reference levels at the end of the Little Ice Age about 150 years ago does not really make much sense because this period represents one of the coldest times of the past 10,000 years.
The choice of a baseline near the lower extreme of a variable parameter is uncommon in science.
The temperature level that was reached during the interval 1940-1970 may serve as a better reference level because it appears to roughly correspond to the average pre-industrial temperature of the past two millennia.”
The choice of a baseline near the lower extreme of a variable parameter is uncommon in science.
The temperature level that was reached during the interval 1940-1970 may serve as a better reference level because it appears to roughly correspond to the average pre-industrial temperature of the past two millennia.”
On an even longer time scale, it is found that
current temperatures have not yet even exceeded the warmest temperatures of a natural warm phase that globally occurred some 7000 years ago, the so-called ‘Holocene Thermal Maximum’.
Global temperatures may have even partly exceeded the 1.5°C limit during this warm phase, when combined land and sea surface temperatures are taken into account. The increase in this natural temperature window and the baseline shift potentially enlarges the headroom for the 1.5°C temperature limit of the Paris Agreement which deserves further study.
Nevertheless, the two researchers caution that the upper ceiling of the 2°C limit is not affected by this, because it is represented by the even warmer climate of the last Interglacial, some 120,000 years ago. The 2°C limit therefore remains valid
The study that was published on 12 December 2017 in the journal ‘frontiers in Earth Science’
reminds policymakers, scientists and the public that the “pre-industrial” times cited in the Paris Agreement involve a dynamic alternation of warm and cold phases which need to be viewed in context.
The Little Ice Age that ended around 1850 AD does not represent a suitable reference level for the 20th and early 21st century warming as it fails basic scientific baseline criteria.
Paper:
Lüning, S., F. Vahrenholt (2017): Paleoclimatological context and reference level of the 2°C and 1.5°C Paris Agreement long-term temperature limits. Frontiers in Earth Science, 12 December 2017, doi: 10.3389/feart.2017.00104
