ADVERTISEMENT

NotPSU: "Freeh source materials" confirm the Curley File

rmb297

Well-Known Member
Aug 24, 2013
2,291
3,049
1
Freeh Report source materials already in the public domain, combined with other evidence, confirm that Tim Curley had a file on Sandusky -- and its contents found their way into the so-called Schultz "secret file"

By
Ray Blehar


Even though the alumni-elected members of the Penn State University (PSU) Board of Trustees (BOT) have succeeded in gaining access to the Freeh source materials, the court sided with Old Main to keep the information from being publicly disclosed.

Regardless of that ruling, and likely unknown to the public, some of the Freeh source materials are already in the public domain - and they prove that evidence was manipulated and/or tampered with in order to railroad PSU officials (i.e., Curley, Schultz, and Spanier).

However, when the source materials are combined with other existing evidence, the totality of the evidence confirms that former PSU Athletic Director (AD) Tim Curley had information related to the Sandusky matter -- and that information was illegally placed into the so-called "secret file" of former PSU VP for Finance and Business, Gary Schultz.

http://notpsu.blogspot.com/2016/02/freeh-source-materials-confirm-curley.html
 
Last edited:
Did the court really side with PSU to keep information from becoming public? I thought the alumni trustees proposed their own confidentiality protocols, which they had offered up long before any court actions, and the court accepted those over psu's.
 
So what does this really mean if anything? So the admin knew something was up with Sandusky. Isn't this old news? I didn't really follow this stuff outside of news reports and basic discussion.
 
Freeh Report source materials already in the public domain, combined with other evidence, confirm that Tim Curley had a file on Sandusky -- and its contents found their way into the so-called Schultz "secret file"

By
Ray Blehar

Even though the alumni-elected members of the Penn State University (PSU) Board of Trustees (BOT) have succeeded in gaining access to the Freeh source materials, the court sided with Old Main to keep the information from being publicly disclosed.

Regardless of that ruling, and likely unknown to the public, some of the Freeh source materials are already in the public domain - and they prove that evidence was manipulated and/or tampered with in order to make the case against PSU officials.

However, when the source materials are combined with other existing evidence, the totality of the evidence confirms that former PSU Athletic Director (AD) Tim Curley had information related to the Sandusky matter -- and that information found its way into the so-called "secret file" of former PSU VP for Finance and Business, Gary Schultz.

http://notpsu.blogspot.com/2016/02/freeh-source-materials-confirm-curley.html
Thank you Ray
 
Erickson and the rest of the cabal of trustees FRAMED Spanier, Curley, and Schultz.

I think we all intuitively knew this the moment you read the Freeh Report's executive summary and in the first page alone found about a dozen doth protest too much phrases saying that the trustees knew nothing or had no knowledge or ....

So a group of trustees who allowed Jerry an office on campus and over-ruled JoePa on access to the football facilities, some of whom were also very involved with the second mile, commissioned a report to say that they didn't know a thing. They needed scapegoat lightning rods.
 
I think we all intuitively knew this the moment you read the Freeh Report's executive summary and in the first page alone found about a dozen doth protest too much phrases saying that the trustees knew nothing or had no knowledge or ....

So a group of trustees who allowed Jerry an office on campus and over-ruled JoePa on access to the football facilities, some of whom were also very involved with the second mile, commissioned a report to say that they didn't know a thing. They needed scapegoat lightning rods.
Well, it's worse than that....let's just say a group of trustees went along with Fina's plan to focus the Sandusky case on PSU in order to deflect attention away from corruption that would have been unearthed if a real investigation of The Second Mile actually took place.
 
Well, it's worse than that....let's just say a group of trustees went along with Fina's plan to focus the Sandusky case on PSU in order to deflect attention away from corruption that would have been unearthed if a real investigation of The Second Mile actually took place.

I am not shocked by this. Which goes to show that Corbett, through Fina, was manipulating so much of the narrative. What gets me is - guys like Surma, Frazier, et al - did they really think they could get away with this, or that it would forever remain silent?
 
I am not shocked by this. Which goes to show that Corbett, through Fina, was manipulating so much of the narrative. What gets me is - guys like Surma, Frazier, et al - did they really think they could get away with this, or that it would forever remain silent?
That is why Freeh was hired. Corbett recommended him and everyone believed if Freeh said it was PSU's fault then no one would question it.
 
That is why Freeh was hired. Corbett recommended him and everyone believed if Freeh said it was PSU's fault then no one would question it.

Without doubt. The question is - how will this be exposed, documented and what will the resultant fall out/punitive damages to those who orchestrated this? As much as no one likes Freeh, he is simply no more than a highly paid errand boy. The real culprits are Corbett, Surma and the OG BoT.
 
I also believe One Term Tommy pushed for Fina to deflect attention away from the 2M so as to protect all his bud's and the mob boys
Though the mob ties haven't been established formally, the PA Corruption Network's judges and prosecutors are likely involved in sex trafficking (a mob specialty). I don't think their proclivities stop with just looking a porn.
 
From the moment Tommy first uttered " we are not going to talk about it, just move on " on his Wednesday morning hour on 1210 in Philly a few short years ago it was apparent lots of folks had something to hide.

Or rather a variety of things to hide. heinous, deceitful, embarrassing, the list is long. Pigs at the trough in more ways than one.

Rodney was duped and in over his head with a gang of sharks. Get that name off the building now.

I am looking forward to the 10 part series on HBO one day covering this mess.

Thanks Ray, great work.
 
So the cabal FRAMED C/S/S.....then Surma decided to toss JVP on the scrap heap as well....and of course Peetz and Frazier had no objections....
Corbutt wanted Spanier. Surma, Frazier, Peetz and their cabal wanted JVP out and C/S/S were necessary tools to link the entire group. Linda Kelley, Noonan, Fina and Freeh made sure all were connected to JS through the football program. It resulted in a hail mary TD on the national stage.
 
From the moment Tommy first uttered " we are not going to talk about it, just move on " on his Wednesday morning hour on 1210 in Philly a few short years ago it was apparent lots of folks had something to hide.

Or rather a variety of things to hide. heinous, deceitful, embarrassing, the list is long. Pigs at the trough in more ways than one.

Rodney was duped and in over his head with a gang of sharks. Get that name off the building now.

I am looking forward to the 10 part series on HBO one day covering this mess.

Thanks Ray, great work.
You're welcome.

You underestimate Erickson. His notebook revealed that he is much more adept than anyone ever thought.

As most here probably know, the crowning achievement for a PSU BOT member or PSU administrator is to get on the Board of Hershey Medical Center....that's where the real money is....and Erickson was getting a piece of the action.
 
You're welcome.

You underestimate Erickson. His notebook revealed that he is much more adept than anyone ever thought.

As most here probably know, the crowning achievement for a PSU BOT member or PSU administrator is to get on the Board of Hershey Medical Center....that's where the real money is....and Erickson was getting a piece of the action.
Gotcha, thanks again.
 
Thanks, @rmb297.

I love how Louis Freeh, the BOT and Sally Jenkins are all still so convinced that Joe talked Curley out of the original plan and convinced Tim to confront Sandusky before reporting outside the university.

Curley's testimony (in Ray's blog) proves that it was actually Curley's idea (not Joe's) to confront Sandusky before reporting outside the university.
Curley%2BTSM%2BPlan%2B188.png


Need more proof? Here's Gary Schultz' notes, dated 2/12/01 (before Curley met with Joe):

But everyone likes to use Curley's email ("after giving it more thought and talking it over with Joe") as the smoking gun that proves Paterno was protecting a pedophile. Look no further than Dan Bernstein's lede, which Jim Clemente indirectly rebuts:
 
Last edited:
Thanks, @rmb297.

I love how Louis Freeh, the BOT and Sally Jenkins are all still so convinced that Joe talked Curley out of the original plan and convinced Tim to confront Sandusky before reporting outside the university.

Curley's testimony (in Ray's blog) proves that it was actually Curley's idea (not Joe's) to confront Sandusky before reporting outside the university.
Curley%2BTSM%2BPlan%2B188.png


Need more proof? Here's Gary Schultz' notes, dated 2/12/01 (before Curley met with Joe):

But everyone likes to use Curley's email ("after giving it more thought and talking it over with Joe") as the smoking gun that proves Paterno was protecting a pedophile. Look no further than Dan Bernstein's lede, which Jim Clemente indirectly rebuts:
I guess you have a lot of ammo to use on Bernstein (if you so choose). The Freeh source materials should also be a big disappointment for Bernstein.
 
Well, it's worse than that....let's just say a group of trustees went along with Fina's plan to focus the Sandusky case on PSU in order to deflect attention away from corruption that would have been unearthed if a real investigation of The Second Mile actually took place.
I thought that from almost day one. The way the BoT kept throwing bread crumbs out to the press until the narrative was firmly entrenched. I know that the heads of fortune 100 companies couldn't be that stupid and hold the positions that they held. Pressure situations is what they have been trained for. It was where do they want to fight this out. They chose the high ground where they could have almost total control.
 
Erickson and the rest of the cabal of trustees FRAMED Spanier, Curley, and Schultz.[/QUOTE


Wow! What transpires from that if proven. Are there laws that were broken from an internal report. Not being smart and maybe dumb but is it like brother framing me for something to my parents? Or outside of perjury or something were any laws broken? Sorry if that's a dumb question.
 
Uh, yes. That's a dumb question considering that the Freeh Report was the "draft" of the November 1, 2012 grand jury presentment used to describe the charges against Curley, Schultz, and Spanier.

Erickson, et al, would be charged with conspiracy to obstruct justice if what I wrote is proven. I won't copy the statute but you can find that here: http://law.onecle.com/pennsylvania/crimes-and-offenses/00.009.003.000.html

The evidence tampering I displayed showing Schultz's signature block transferred onto the retirement papers, if proven, is a forgery.

§ 4101. Forgery.
(a) Offense defined.
--A person is guilty of forgery if, with
intent to defraud or injure anyone, or with knowledge that he is
facilitating a fraud or injury to be perpetrated by anyone, the
actor:
(1) alters any writing of another without his authority;
(2) makes, completes, executes, authenticates, issues or
transfers any writing so that it purports to be the act of
another who did not authorize that act, or to have been
executed at a time or place or in a numbered sequence other
than was in fact the case, or to be a copy of an original
when no such original existed; or
(3) utters any writing which he knows to be forged in a
manner specified in paragraphs (1) or (2) of this subsection.
(b) Definition.--As used in this section the word "writing"
includes printing or any other method of recording information,
money, coins, tokens, stamps, seals, credit cards, badges,
trademarks, electronic signatures and other symbols of value,
right, privilege, or identification.
(c) Grading.--Forgery is a felony of the second degree if
the writing is or purports to be part of an issue of money,
securities, postage or revenue stamps, or other instruments
issued by the government, or part of an issue of stock, bonds or
other instruments representing interests in or claims against
any property or enterprise. Forgery is a felony of the third
degree if the writing is or purports to be a will, deed,
contract, release, commercial instrument, or other document
evidencing, creating, transferring, altering, terminating, or
otherwise affecting legal relations. Otherwise forgery is a
misdemeanor of the first degree.
(Dec. 16, 2002, P.L.1953, No.226, eff. 60 days)
Having knowledge of evidence tampering and manipulation is also a crime.
 
Uh, yes. That's a dumb question considering that the Freeh Report was the "draft" of the November 1, 2012 grand jury presentment used to describe the charges against Curley, Schultz, and Spanier.

Erickson, et al, would be charged with conspiracy to obstruct justice if what I wrote is proven. I won't copy the statute but you can find that here: http://law.onecle.com/pennsylvania/crimes-and-offenses/00.009.003.000.html

The evidence tampering I displayed showing Schultz's signature block transferred onto the retirement papers, if proven, is a forgery.

§ 4101. Forgery.
(a) Offense defined.
--A person is guilty of forgery if, with
intent to defraud or injure anyone, or with knowledge that he is
facilitating a fraud or injury to be perpetrated by anyone, the
actor:
(1) alters any writing of another without his authority;
(2) makes, completes, executes, authenticates, issues or
transfers any writing so that it purports to be the act of
another who did not authorize that act, or to have been
executed at a time or place or in a numbered sequence other
than was in fact the case, or to be a copy of an original
when no such original existed; or
(3) utters any writing which he knows to be forged in a
manner specified in paragraphs (1) or (2) of this subsection.
(b) Definition.--As used in this section the word "writing"
includes printing or any other method of recording information,
money, coins, tokens, stamps, seals, credit cards, badges,
trademarks, electronic signatures and other symbols of value,
right, privilege, or identification.
(c) Grading.--Forgery is a felony of the second degree if
the writing is or purports to be part of an issue of money,
securities, postage or revenue stamps, or other instruments
issued by the government, or part of an issue of stock, bonds or
other instruments representing interests in or claims against
any property or enterprise. Forgery is a felony of the third
degree if the writing is or purports to be a will, deed,
contract, release, commercial instrument, or other document
evidencing, creating, transferring, altering, terminating, or
otherwise affecting legal relations. Otherwise forgery is a
misdemeanor of the first degree.
(Dec. 16, 2002, P.L.1953, No.226, eff. 60 days)
Having knowledge of evidence tampering and manipulation is also a crime.



Ok thanks. I just didn't follow the situation that closely in high school. Did not read the report. Sorry for the dumb question.
 
Admitting up front I don't know a ton about data mining and cookies and the way the Internet works, but this thread is currently near the top of the Yahoo! home page. Not the blog post, but this BWI/McAndrew thread. Anyone else seeing the same? It was the top story beneath the Oscars photo/story row for a few moments.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT