Why is his conference record and NCAA appearances worse than Ed. I assume you’re counting Ed in your “how bad it’s been for a while”. I’m no Ed fan by the way.
Ed benefitted from some down years in the Big Ten. Otherwise, Ed was pretty terrible and had seasons of 1, 3, 2, and 3 conference wins. (That represents 4 of his 8 years here, BTW). So I get tired of the comparisons with Ed's record. Ed sucked as badly as this staff, and because his recruiting was bizarre (see the great Euro experiment of 2004), I think he was even worse.
I'll repeat what I think a good staff should be able to do here: I'd say 4 tournament appearances every 10 years. But more importantly, finishing .500 or better in the Big Ten in the majority of years. And making a run at the Big Ten title maybe once or twice a decade. If Pat could even come close to coaching on the same level he can recruit, I think he could do that here. But he has shown that he has a lot of weaknesses as a coach.
I think that Jerry Dunn was the best coach we've had in the last 20 years. And we all know that isn't saying much for this program.