Runningback U. Dorsette Martin Hall of Famers. McCoy over 10,000 rushing yards. Connors tearing it up, back in the day Iron head Heyward and the list goes on what say ye
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Runningback U. Dorsette Martin Hall of Famers. McCoy over 10,000 rushing yards. Connors tearing it up, back in the day Iron head Heyward and the list goes on what say ye
Southern California may have some contention with that.
But, is the standard what they did in college or NFL? I think PSU holds it's own with college running backs.
Runningback U. Dorsette Martin Hall of Famers. McCoy over 10,000 rushing yards. Connors tearing it up, back in the day Iron head Heyward and the list goes on what say ye
What is the standard? NFL success or college success?Who?
Only 2 that come to mind over last 12 years are LJ and Barkley
I mean we have had a few that had brief stints like Hunt..But producing RB hasn’t been our thing.
Pitt I think has 3 RB starting this year in Conner, McCoy, Lewis.
What is the standard? NFL success or college success?
The question is not difficult.
pitt is Low Attendance U.Runningback U. Dorsette Martin Hall of Famers. McCoy over 10,000 rushing yards. Connors tearing it up, back in the day Iron head Heyward and the list goes on what say ye
51 - 6.Runningback U. Dorsette Martin Hall of Famers. McCoy over 10,000 rushing yards. Connors tearing it up, back in the day Iron head Heyward and the list goes on what say ye
Penn state is more running back u than Pitt will ever be I mean really it isn’t even close.Runningback U. Dorsette Martin Hall of Famers. McCoy over 10,000 rushing yards. Connors tearing it up, back in the day Iron head Heyward and the list goes on what say ye
I'll give Pitt credit, they have produced a ton of great NFL players. It's unbelievable how many losing seasons they have had considering so much top end talent at that school on a regular basis.
Who?
Only 2 that come to mind over last 12 years are LJ and Barkley
I mean we have had a few that had brief stints like Hunt..But producing RB hasn’t been our thing.
Pitt I think has 3 RB starting this year in Conner, McCoy, Lewis.
Moore Mitchell cappelletti Warner Harris hall of famers.
Thomas dozier barkely lj all Americans.
Southern California may have some contention with that.
But, is the standard what they did in college or NFL? I think PSU holds it's own with college running backs.
Runningback U. Dorsette Martin Hall of Famers. McCoy over 10,000 rushing yards. Connors tearing it up, back in the day Iron head Heyward and the list goes on what say ye
you arent getting what Im saying re pitt fandomHaving one or two great players doesn't make a team good. While sometimes they find a diamond in the rough, they generally seem to take highly talented players with baggage (i.e. McCoy), who leave for the NFL after a short stint at Pitt, and it's not really a surprise that they do well in the NFL. Pitt has nothing to do with their NFL success, and their NFL success has nothing to do with Pitt.
One of pitt's top pros ever, Larry Fitzgerald, now identifies his college as the University of Phoenix. LOL.Because Pitt has nothing else?
One of pitt's top pros ever, Larry Fitzgerald, now identifies his college as the University of Phoenix. LOL.
Why is this here?
Museum U?
How about a free beverage ?I think "RB U", "LB U", "QB U" etc is all based on how programs produce players for the next level. We aren't "RB U" with that criteria although Saquon's definitely going to help. Pitt may have a claim for it. Not sure why that would bother us. They have nothing. Give them something.
The Pitt fans who fell asleep in the stands during the 4th quarter.Who wouldn't take a free beverage?
What is the standard? NFL success or college success?
The question is not difficult.
Some go by NFL success as that creates their desired answer. To me, it's all about college success. For example: If one school produced nine Heisman Trophy-winning quarterbacks and All-American after All-American at quarterback that didn't win the Heisman Trophy for them but they didn't pan out in the NFL, that school wouldn't be Quarterback U?
Charlie Ward won the Heisman trophy at FSU playing quarterback yet never played in the NFL opting to play in the NBA instead. Does that diminish what he accomplished in college? Do the injuries that curtailed the careers of Dennis Onkotz and Ki-Jana Carter diminish what they accomplished in college?
If it's by what players accomplish in the NFL, what about the following players: Does what Terrelle Pryor accomplish count towards Ohio State's wide receivers? He never played WR at Ohio State but it's what he does in the NFL right? Does Antwan Randel-El count towards Indiana's receivers? He played quarterback at IU. Position changes are not uncommon. So why give credit to their alma mater for a position they never played at in college?
What about Matt Cassell? Does he count towards USC's quarterbacks? He never started a game and I believe attempted 30 passes in his college career. So what he accomplished in the NFL help USC as Quarterback U? Does Chris Hogan count towards Penn State's wide receivers?
Jack Lambert and James Harrison both went to Kent State. A hall-of-famer and near hall of famer, is Kent State more of a Linebacker U than Pitt?
To me, it's what you accomplish in college that should count towards a college being a position U.
I'll give you one further point of contention with me on a similar vein. Miami 2001. Some would call them the greatest college football team of all-time based primarily on what their players accomplished in the NFL. Why should anything a player accomplishes in the NFL influence what actually happened in the past. If the '01 Hurricanes produced 22 NFL hall of famers that doesn't change the fact they struggled to beat Boston College and only beat 14th ranked Virginia Tech by only two points on the field of play in 2001. Future accomplishments do not change past results and isn't that what should be compared. If anything, it shows how talented they were but not what they actually accomplished. If they were THAT great, they should have destroyed every opponent based on what their players accomplished in the NFL and they did not.
That's like proclaiming Bryce Harper's little league team the greatest ever because he played on it even though they may have not even made the LL World Series.
Runningback U. Dorsette Martin Hall of Famers. McCoy over 10,000 rushing yards. Connors tearing it up, back in the day Iron head Heyward and the list goes on what say ye
Moore Mitchell cappelletti Warner Harris hall of famers.
Thomas dozier barkely lj all Americans.