You realize this is fake don’t you?
Is that a Braves hat?
The same reasons we got into WWll, to alley with Europe to fight Nazi aggression.Why are we giving billions to Ukraine when there are homeless in State College, and all over this country?
It's a difficult situation. I don't know anybody who supports Putin but what we've been doing the past couple of years hasn't deterred him. China and others are buying Russian oil and developing alliances.
300,000 dead, 1/3 of the Ukranian population is gone, infrastructure destroyed, etc. Do you think Putin will relinquish conquered land if we keep it up for a few more years? I don't. I don't know the answer but what we've been doing has only slowed him. It hasn't come close to stopping him.The same reasons we got into WWll, to alley with Europe to fight Nazi aggression.
Continuing robust aid to Ukraine is a powerful deterrent to future Russian aggression. A Russian victory in Ukraine could encourage President Vladimir Putin’s territorial ambitions, possibly leading him to target a member of NATO. That could lead to a direct U.S.-Russia conflict that would put American lives at risk and increase the possibility of a broader war. Funding Ukraine now is a strategic investment to prevent greater costs later.
Not to worry Gzit, shortly we'll be providing $$ aid to Russia for the defeat of Ukraine. Russia has depleted numbers of troops, equipment, and low on other resources.
If you watched the Zelensky-Trump-Vance fiasco in the white house, so now that Russia is in a very vulnerable position for defeat, I have a horrible gut feeling the USA will align with Putin.
![]()
We’re not giving literal cash to Ukraine. We’re giving literal cash to U.S. factories and citizens to build the ammunition we’re sending to Ukraine. The cash stays with us. That’s the real America First policy.Why are we giving billions to Ukraine when there are homeless in State College, and all over this country?
Supporting Ukraine’s government. As of May, USAID had obligated $22.9 billion for direct budget support for Ukraine’s government, largely to reimburse the government for eligible expenses, such as salaries for teachers, civil servants, and healthcare workers. USAID has used a layered approach to oversee this funding, with different entities responsible for providing different types of oversight—such as identifying gaps in Ukrainian government processes and conducting financial audits. However, some of these entities’ work has limitations, which affect the level of accountability their oversight provides.We’re not giving literal cash to Ukraine. We’re giving literal cash to U.S. factories and citizens to build the ammunition we’re sending to Ukraine. The cash stays with us. That’s the real America First policy.
I understand that and can see why we give them weapons, how much is too much much I don't know. Why do we always have to be the worlds police force? China sits back and laughs.The same reasons we got into WWll, to alley with Europe to fight Nazi aggression.
Continuing robust aid to Ukraine is a powerful deterrent to future Russian aggression. A Russian victory in Ukraine could encourage President Vladimir Putin’s territorial ambitions, possibly leading him to target a member of NATO. That could lead to a direct U.S.-Russia conflict that would put American lives at risk and increase the possibility of a broader war. Funding Ukraine now is a strategic investment to prevent greater costs later.
Not to worry Gzit, shortly we'll be providing $$ aid to Russia for the defeat of Ukraine. Russia has depleted numbers of troops, equipment, and low on other resources.
If you watched the Zelensky-Trump-Vance fiasco in the white house, so now that Russia is in a very vulnerable position for defeat, I have a horrible gut feeling the USA will align with Putin.
![]()
A Russian victory in Ukraine could encourage President Vladimir Putin’s territorial ambitions, possibly leading him to target a member of NATO.
![]()
Not sure if serious.
You think the Russian army, who is pulling out WW2 era equipment and couldn't roll over tiny UKR, is going to attack a NATO county??
Definitely political.
We’er pulling out of NATO, right.Yes, sadly people believe this.
We’er pulling out of NATO, right.
I don’t believe our administration believes we need allies in Europe or North America or South America for that matter.
Link:
![]()
Europe quietly prepares for World War III
NATO countries on the alliance's eastern flank have started work on extensive anti-tank defenses and boosting their air defences.www.newsweek.com
Definitely political.
Because your type would bitch about giving to the homeless, too.Why are we giving billions to Ukraine when there are homeless in State College, and all over this country?
Everyone bitches about everythingBecause your type would bitch about giving to the homeless, too.
We’ll soon be providing weapons to Ukraine to defeat Russia? If that is possible, why did we wait 3 years? Funny how Putin only annexed Crimea when the Great Apologist, Obama, was in office and Hamas attacked Israel when the Great Appeaser, Biden, was in office but didn’t do a damn thing when his “puppet” was President. Since all these European leaders and Trump haters in this country are critical of his efforts to negotiate a peace deal, I think Trump and the US should step aside and let those European leaders do something they haven’t been able to do for 3 years: negotiate a peace deal themselves or pay 100% of the cost to enable their neighbor, Ukraine, to keep fighting this war. I for one am waiting with bated breath to hear about the progress of their weekend peace talks.The same reasons we got into WWll, to alley with Europe to fight Nazi aggression.
Continuing robust aid to Ukraine is a powerful deterrent to future Russian aggression. A Russian victory in Ukraine could encourage President Vladimir Putin’s territorial ambitions, possibly leading him to target a member of NATO. That could lead to a direct U.S.-Russia conflict that would put American lives at risk and increase the possibility of a broader war. Funding Ukraine now is a strategic investment to prevent greater costs later.
Not to worry Gzit, shortly we'll be providing $$ aid to Russia for the defeat of Ukraine. Russia has depleted numbers of troops, equipment, and low on other resources.
If you watched the Zelensky-Trump-Vance fiasco in the white house, so now that Russia is in a very vulnerable position for defeat, I have a horrible gut feeling the USA will align with Putin.
![]()
You're wrong there. I can't imagine anyone bitching about taking care of the homeless, if they do, they are not "my type"Because your type would bitch about giving to the homeless, too.
I'll give that little bitch a suggestion:
True, we can plan our exit strategy .I think you're just guessing.
What we know is that Russia doesn't currently have the tech or manpower to attack the rest of Europe.
We can't pull out of NATO, for a variety of reasons. But we can threaten to pull out in the future and allow Europe to take care of their own wars.
LdN
Go over and shoot them:It certainly shouldn’t be - Russia is our arch enemy…the shoot on sight type of enemy.
Yep, let them pay their own bills.Supporting Ukraine’s government. As of May, USAID had obligated $22.9 billion for direct budget support for Ukraine’s government, largely to reimburse the government for eligible expenses, such as salaries for teachers, civil servants, and healthcare workers. USAID has used a layered approach to oversee this funding, with different entities responsible for providing different types of oversight—such as identifying gaps in Ukrainian government processes and conducting financial audits. However, some of these entities’ work has limitations, which affect the level of accountability their oversight provides.
Putin has nukes , Ukraine doesn't . Here sign up some of your younger relatives:The same reasons we got into WWll, to alley with Europe to fight Nazi aggression.
Continuing robust aid to Ukraine is a powerful deterrent to future Russian aggression. A Russian victory in Ukraine could encourage President Vladimir Putin’s territorial ambitions, possibly leading him to target a member of NATO. That could lead to a direct U.S.-Russia conflict that would put American lives at risk and increase the possibility of a broader war. Funding Ukraine now is a strategic investment to prevent greater costs later.
Not to worry Gzit, shortly we'll be providing $$ aid to Russia for the defeat of Ukraine. Russia has depleted numbers of troops, equipment, and low on other resources.
If you watched the Zelensky-Trump-Vance fiasco in the white house, so now that Russia is in a very vulnerable position for defeat, I have a horrible gut feeling the USA will align with Putin.
![]()