Don't ruin it w/ politics. I find it funny that the news reader (in the low cut blouse) seems to amp up her outrage. Best tweet I read about this guy said "This was your Sgt. Peppers"
The guy doesn't understand the first amendment therefore he should refrain from saying how much he believes in it.Here's his most recent post about ESPN....he crushes them.
https://www.outkickthecoverage.com/first-amendment-espn-modern-media/
The guy doesn't understand the first amendment therefore he should refrain from saying how much he believes in it.
It was started by a boob!This thread was supposed to be about boobs. I think it would have been great if he would have complimented the news reader on her own set. She seems so modest though.
He would have been good on Match Game.He loves to freely speak about boobs while peaceably assembling.
Nowhere in his diatribe did he write anything about the government taking action against anyone's speech. That's what the First Amendment prohibits.How so ?
Where I disagree w/ him is what if an espn anchor or a fox news anchor starts re-tweeting isis tweets? Then his absolutism runs into a pretty big problem. In the end, espn can obviously do whatever they want and suffer any consequences or gains they deserve.Nowhere in his diatribe did he write anything about the government taking action against anyone's speech. That's what the First Amendment prohibits.
Let me say ESPN sucks. However, as a non-government entity they can take whatever action they see fit in order to protect themselves. Maybe they'd get sued but it wouldn't be because ESPN somehow abridged anyone's free speech. An argument can easily be made ESPN has a double standard regarding comments made by their employees. In fact, I'd agree with that. However whining about free speech rights being trampled is just a way to get people fired up when it's not a legitimate issue in the first place.
Nowhere in his diatribe did he write anything about the government taking action against anyone's speech. That's what the First Amendment prohibits.
Let me say ESPN sucks. However, as a non-government entity they can take whatever action they see fit in order to protect themselves. Maybe they'd get sued but it wouldn't be because ESPN somehow abridged anyone's free speech. An argument can easily be made ESPN has a double standard regarding comments made by their employees. In fact, I'd agree with that. However whining about free speech rights being trampled is just a way to get people fired up when it's not a legitimate issue in the first place.
re-tweating Isis tweets is not a big deal considering the tweets are already there, in the public domain. Not different if they issue some statement, every news org will read/show it on air.Where I disagree w/ him is what if an espn anchor or a fox news anchor starts re-tweeting isis tweets? Then his absolutism runs into a pretty big problem. In the end, espn can obviously do whatever they want and suffer any consequences or gains they deserve.
Why can't it be both? (See how often that phrase can be applied?!)I love boobs too. I mean booze.
Where I disagree w/ him is what if an espn anchor or a fox news anchor starts re-tweeting isis tweets? Then his absolutism runs into a pretty big problem. In the end, espn can obviously do whatever they want and suffer any consequences or gains they deserve.
Boobs and the First Amendment? Those are your only two beliefs? Grow up.