How do you know this is a fact, you're not proving that's the case.yeah...I think that is the point. What is the benefit of something like "blind spot detection" if the cost of the feature is more than the risk associated with not having it?
How do you know this is a fact, you're not proving that's the case.yeah...I think that is the point. What is the benefit of something like "blind spot detection" if the cost of the feature is more than the risk associated with not having it?
did you miss the question mark at the end?How do you know this is a fact, you're not proving that's the case.
I had some issues recently with Nationwide. My agent said he is now steering clear of them because they have become very difficult to deal with. He has heard bad rumors about their loss exposures and believes that is the problem.I work in Insurance and we have raised rates up to 25% or more this year for the more poor performers but all are getting increases - Commercial Insurance not personnel and the reasons why:
1) higher costs to repair vehicles - no such thing as a fender bender anymore
2) Huge rise in claims costs and settlement - more "nuclear" verdicts
3) More accidents due to distracted drivers
4) Increase in medical costs for injured victims
and some states are pulling the rest of the country down specifically - Florida, Texas and LA along with California.
If you missed it to show how bad it has gotten State Farm was just downgraded from an A Rated carrier to B Rated which is a HUGE deal in the Insurance world - thy said they are pulling out of CA Homeowners biz - they left Florida years ago.
Based on your posts, it "sounded" like a rhetorical question.did you miss the question mark at the end?
just asking the question. in business we always ask, is the juice worth the squeeze? If not, just eat the fruit. If the feature (say, blind side section) costs more than it saves, what is it's value? I would think that there is some potential safety issues in terms of less chances of getting injured. But, again, that all goes into the risk profile.Based on your posts, it "sounded" like a rhetorical question.
BTW, I saw this today too. I am not sure why these increases are higher than inflation but suspect it has to do with supply chain and salary increases.
My wife's car insurance rose from $277 last October to $313 this April. We have been with this company over 40 years, 1 accident claim over 20 years ago, we get every discount they offer as recognized safe drivers, yet this ridiculous increase happens. When will this stop? We have been on fixed incomes for 19 years and this upward creep of EVERY bill we pay needs to end. Many Amish live in the area, maybe I should inquire about buying a horse and buggy? Our Medicare Part B cost was $265 for both of us together 7 years ago, today it is $578 for both. I dread what it will cost next year. Even with me being healthy enough to work a part-time job to help make ends meet there is a limit to how much that will cover. We will be joining the Revolution WHEN it starts, it's the only answer.
We still have the New England Revolution!The Revolution is over. It disbanded while Prince was still alive, and now that he's dead, it's gone forever.
Booo! Not a chance! 😁Ya gotta believe, it's our only hope!The Revolution is over. It disbanded while Prince was still alive, and now that he's dead, it's gone forever.
I suspect texting while driving has increased accidents by as much as blind spot monitors and back up cameras have helped reduce them.thanks. a few comments/questions
The nuclear verdicts are out of control as are medial costs when the driver of one car is liable for others.
- you conflate homeowners with car. I think those are two separate issues. I think you were trying to make two separate points but just wanted to define that.
- Agreed on the "fender benders" but the tech will make them more expensive but should be far less for cars equipped with notifications that you are getting too close to another car while parking, lane assist, forward collision, cross-traffic alert, automatic emergency brake and the rest. Net net should be better.
- Does the industry give discounts for having these tools on your car?
- I see a lot of apps that now monitor your driving and give you discounts. Legit or not?
Don’t forget government intrusion and as always when they stick their nose in it’s going to cost more for the consumer.One would assume many of the "sophisticated technologies" would lead to fewer accidents. Things like lane assist, blind spot detection, and forward collision learning should lower insurance costs, not increase them. I read an article stating that "self driving mode", despite the media, is hundreds of times safer than human driving. the point is that it eliminates distracted drivers (mobile phone, kids, radio stations) and drivers who are under the influence (or just tired).
Parts availability has been a problem and hasn't caught up since the shortages.
It doesn't seem to add up.
Much of the regulation is designed to protect the poor drivers at the expense of the good drivers. Also, if someone gets caught driving without insurance, they get a small fine and are back on the street driving without insurance. A high percentage of a companies large payouts are a result of uninsured motorist coverage. Guess what happens to that other driver with no insurance? Nothing.Don’t forget government intrusion and as always when they stick their nose in it’s going to cost more for the consumer.
I watched a funny but eye opening skit which showed how many taxes are involved with bringing simple products to market just rediculous
The homeowners and auto overlap each other - insurance companies will subsidize a poor performing line with a profitable one bit if both are running hot there is no where to go bit raise all rates. It actually could be worse since many companies do not make an underwriting profit, that is they pay oit more than they take in with premiums but they still make money off the billions they have invested but when those returns go down they have to focus on making an underwriting profit.thanks. a few comments/questions
The nuclear verdicts are out of control as are medial costs when the driver of one car is liable for others.
- you conflate homeowners with car. I think those are two separate issues. I think you were trying to make two separate points but just wanted to define that.
- Agreed on the "fender benders" but the tech will make them more expensive but should be far less for cars equipped with notifications that you are getting too close to another car while parking, lane assist, forward collision, cross-traffic alert, automatic emergency brake and the rest. Net net should be better.
- Does the industry give discounts for having these tools on your car?
- I see a lot of apps that now monitor your driving and give you discounts. Legit or not?
Most of their billions is actually in surplus to pay claims and if they have to start dipping into that, then they start having financial problems. It’s not like all their billions are just profit going into executives pockets.The homeowners and auto overlap each other - insurance companies will subsidize a poor performing line with a profitable one bit if both are running hot there is no where to go bit raise all rates. It actually could be worse since many companies do not make an underwriting profit, that is they pay oit more than they take in with premiums but they still make money off the billions they have invested but when those returns go down they have to focus on making an underwriting profit.
Correct and there are statutory requirements for the amount of reserves you have to have based upon the limits of liability you have outstanding. But some very big Insurance have failed over the years even with regulatory oversight. The personnel lines market is really struggling right now so I would expect Homeowners and personnel Auto premiums to continue to rise and companies continuing pulling out of distressed areas like Florida even though state insurance commissions hate when they do that and loom to punish them.Most of their billions is actually in surplus to pay claims and if they have to start dipping into that, then they start having financial problems. It’s not like all their billions are just profit going into executives pockets.
Or gouging and greed.BTW, I saw this today too. I am not sure why these increases are higher than inflation but suspect it has to do with supply chain and salary increases.
Yes, there’s not much relief in sight.Correct and there are statutory requirements for the amount of reserves you have to have based upon the limits of liability you have outstanding. But some very big Insurance have failed over the years even with regulatory oversight. The personnel lines market is really struggling right now so I would expect Homeowners and personnel Auto premiums to continue to rise and companies continuing pulling out of distressed areas like Florida even though state insurance commissions hate when they do that and loom to punish them.
Funny how the “gouging and greed” started when the costs of everything went up, the supply chain went to crap, and the weather patterns got really bad….weird how that works.Or gouging and greed.
Yep, I got rear-ended on the Baltimore beltway a month ago, actually the car behind me got rear-ended and pushed into me. If I didn’t get out of my car to check on the others, I think the person that ran into us would have left the scene. They were someone that was undocumented and of course had no insurance. It’s been quite the ordeal having to, go through all the repair process with the insurance company since they know that there’s nothing they can do but pay it out of their own pockets since the one who caused the accident won’t be asked to pay any of it.Much of the regulation is designed to protect the poor drivers at the expense of the good drivers. Also, if someone gets caught driving without insurance, they get a small fine and are back on the street driving without insurance. A high percentage of a companies large payouts are a result of uninsured motorist coverage. Guess what happens to that other driver with no insurance? Nothing.
April 10, 2024, 6:29 PM EDT
By Rob Wile
Wednesday's inflation report showed consumer price growth continues to drift higher.
The Bureau of Labor Statistics reported price growth accelerated to 3.5% in March, from 3.2% in February.
Few categories had as big a jump year on year than auto insurance, which soared 22% from March 2023, the most significant year-on-year jump in that category since 1976.
And over the last few years, average auto insurance rates have surged 43%.
As of April, the national average cost of car insurance is $2,314 per year for full coverage and $644 per year for the bare minimum, according to Bankrate.
That works out to about $193 a month for full coverage and $54 for minimum coverage.
A host of factors determine how much insurance companies charge drivers, but the cost of nearly all of them seem to be increasing.
One major factor is simply the rising cost of modern vehicles themselves. Today, a new vehicle costs about $10,000 more than it did before the pandemic. Blame supply-chain issues that drove up the cost of vehicle parts, increased labor costs and customer demand, which has naturally pushed prices upward.
The increasing sophistication of the technology in today’s vehicles also contributes to rising costs, said Robert Passmore, department vice president of personal lines at American Property Casualty Insurance Association. Cameras and sensors, which are used for various driver-assistance technologies, like emergency braking, automated parking and blind-spot monitoring, require parts that are more expensive to replace. They're also subject to higher labor costs, Passmore said.
More complex and expensive repairs are also taking longer, and that shows up as higher vehicle costs, Passmore said. And worker shortages have resulted in higher pay for technicians.
Consumer prices moved higher in March. Auto insurance costs were a major reason.
Drivers in the U.S. are now paying nearly $200 a month on average for full coverage.www.nbcnews.com
BTW, I saw this today too. I am not sure why these increases are higher than inflation but suspect it has to do with supply chain and salary increases.
Unless you looked at my numbers---it tells you food inflation over the last 10 years(last 3 mainly) is a lot more the 31%Or gouging and greed.
Or gouging and greed.
Supply chain problems caused shortages which temporarily led to higher prices but those supply chain problems have been resolved for quite some time. I don't see how they are a reason for current high prices.Funny how the “gouging and greed” started when the costs of everything went up, the supply chain went to crap, and the weather patterns got really bad….weird how that works.
It's a paradox but I think it makes sense. For 50 years the US has tried to make cars injury proof and idiot proof instead of requiring drivers to be safe. And in the interest of safer highways and roadways, we've continually put up more red lights and eliminated merges and turn-on-reds and anything that requires an intelligent driver's attention.
Essentially we've dumbed down driving, so we got dumb drivers. Meanwhile we added huge video screens to cars so drivers can amuse themselves with things other than driving -- while they're driving. That doesn't seem smart to me.
I've had a beef with red lights for a long time. They're really not safe -- red lights lead to gruesome injuries, head-on and t-bone type accidents at high speed. Europe has eliminated millions of red lights in favor of traffic circles.
European drivers have to actually have their eyes on the road instead of sitting at red lights watching Youtube. It cuts down on injury accidents and also gets people to their destination a lot faster than stopping for 2 minutes every 500 feet like in the USA. But every time you try to put in a traffic circle in the US you have stupid people complaining because merging is so difficult and they can't figure it out. Dumb drivers.
That ia another new thing - people more and more flee accident scenes. Look at that KC receiver in a Lambo racing a Vette and wrecked into a bunch of people in TX - he and his buddies casually gotYep, I got rear-ended on the Baltimore beltway a month ago, actually the car behind me got rear-ended and pushed into me. If I didn’t get out of my car to check on the others, I think the person that ran into us would have left the scene. They were someone that was undocumented and of course had no insurance. It’s been quite the ordeal having to, go through all the repair process with the insurance company since they know that there’s nothing they can do but pay it out of their own pockets since the one who caused the accident won’t be asked to pay any of it.
Agreed. But they were just stupid. The Vette was registered to him and the Lamborghini was rented to him. He’d have been caught either way with or without the videoThat ia another new thing - people more and more flee accident scenes. Look at that KC receiver in a Lambo racing a Vette and wrecked into a bunch of people in TX - he and his buddies casually got
Out of their cars in the highway and walked away. Fortunately someone had them all on video.
100%….automatic transmission was the start of this…I made my kid drive a 5 speed. Taught him driver skills and can’t use the phone while driving…Europeans go thru a lot to get a drivers license as well. They use their turn signals, they get out of the left lane with discipline in the highways etc. I drive a leveled F150 here in SoFla wow the things I see while driving. It’s unreal we don’t have more car accidents. And woman seem to be on their phones a lot more, just saying and they are supposed to be less cost with regards to insurance, those actuariaries might want to relook at their analytics.
The supply chain issue has not been resolved. Many repairs take as long as 6-8 months due to supply chain.Supply chain problems caused shortages which temporarily led to higher prices but those supply chain problems have been resolved for quite some time. I don't see how they are a reason for current high prices.
The greed argument also doesn't make much sense to me. Competition should limit that. BK and Wendy's would take business from McDonald's if they were over charging. Wegmans, Publix, Aldi, and Kroger would be taking business from Walmart if they were over charging.
We know that dock workers and truck drivers got big raises. We also know that companies are paying higher wages to lower skilled workers (maybe $15/hr vs $12/hr). I believe that's the biggest contributor to higher prices. Also fuel prices.
I remember when shipping containers were backed up in California and that's no longer the case. I remember the chip shortage which has dissipated. New cars were unavailable so used car prices temporarily shot up. Almost all of this was due to shut downs that slowed production. Even oil production took a while to ramp back up but companies worked to restore production to meet demand. I don't know the specifics of car parts but I struggle to think of a good reason production would still be down. Somebody hit my car a year ago. It needed a bumper, quarter panel, and electronic parts that took a week to arrive.The supply chain issue has not been resolved. Many repairs take as long as 6-8 months due to supply chain.
It’s many of the electronic car parts and it’s widespread, not isolated. And there’s still a shortage of new cars as well as used cars. It’s not something that’s just going to go away….it will take time.I remember when shipping containers were backed up in California and that's no longer the case. I remember the chip shortage which has dissipated. New cars were unavailable so used car prices temporarily shot up. Almost all of this was due to shut downs that slowed production. Even oil production took a while to ramp back up but companies worked to restore production to meet demand. I don't know the specifics of car parts but I struggle to think of a good reason production would still be down. Somebody hit my car a year ago. It needed a bumper, quarter panel, and electronic parts that took a week to arrive.
I just read a U.S. Bank article that said current supply chain issues are now largely isolated. I looked up auto parts shortages and it said it was mostly Accura/Honda but it didn't say why. U.S. business inventories are at near record levels.
Of course will always have isolated issues. Try to get a roof fixed after a hurricane in Florida. Or a dozen eggs when a large % of chickens got wiped out by the bird flu. But those outliers always exist.
Had to replace my 2016 F150 81K miles-both valve cover gaskets were leaking-Ford back order 3 months and there are no after market valve covers. Bought a new F150 didnt want to--but Ford had 1.9% 6 years on 23'sI remember when shipping containers were backed up in California and that's no longer the case. I remember the chip shortage which has dissipated. New cars were unavailable so used car prices temporarily shot up. Almost all of this was due to shut downs that slowed production. Even oil production took a while to ramp back up but companies worked to restore production to meet demand. I don't know the specifics of car parts but I struggle to think of a good reason production would still be down.
I just read a U.S. Bank article that said current supply chain issues are now largely isolated. I looked up auto parts shortages and it said it was mostly Accura/Honda but it didn't say why. U.S. business inventories are at near record levels.
Of course will always have isolated issues. Try to get a roof fixed after a hurricane in Florida. Or a dozen eggs when a large % of chickens got wiped out by the bird flu. But those outliers always exis
I did a search on F-150 parts shortages and an article from 2018 popped up.Had to replace my 2016 F150 81K miles-both valve cover gaskets were leaking-Ford back order 3 months and there are no after market valve covers. Bought a new F150 didnt want to--but Ford had 1.9% 6 years on 23's
Just got a $2K dollar annual increase in my Home/Auto policy last week....no claims ever "knock on wood"
Food costs are threw the roof--and hey McDonald's unreal.....
Also have you noticed things like brakes = they don't put on new pads and turn the rotors they replace the rotora and everything so it's like $750 instead od $250.Since I cook and do most of the food shopping I know the prices of things.. I am not a cheap person but holy cow... Was at Walmart today and quaker oats rice cakes $3.48 was blown away.. Used to be like $2.24. I shop at Walmart for standard stuff, publix and fresh market weekly..
Can't just repalce valve cover gasket need entire bemmnew valve covers for 3.5....i called around.. I also learned my main bearing seal was going so I said.. Yeah not sinking in anymore money..
Besides Ford dealer telling me and then calling tire plus got same story.. This was in Feb 2024.
Ford f150 valve cover supply (or lack of)
Greetings ford owners. Any word on why the 3.5 ecoboost valve covers are out of stock everywhere? Seems like ford or the manufacturer may be holding back the supply.www.bbcboards.net
Are rotors thinner than they used to be? They used to turn them but not any more.Also have you noticed things like brakes = they don't put on new pads and turn the rotors they replace the rotora and everything so it's like $750 instead od $250.
You have that whole scenario completely backwards. PennDOT literature clearly states that STOP signs cannot be utilized for speed control, and a local municipality has to ask permission to even install one on any State route, which PennDOT can and does deny. And traffic lights are $120,000+, and even more of a pain to get authorized.In Pa., unlike other states, red lights even on major highways are controlled by the local borough or township, and the state highway dept gets no say. So basically every time Wawa opens a store, they go to the local borough council and get their own stop light. PennDOT spends billions of dollars on highways and then can't stop the local governments from turning those highways into parking lots.
Where I live in Delco (just like in the city of Phila) there are multi-stage, time-sucking red lights that were set up 40 years ago for a factory or school that is no longer operating. They never get removed or even re-timed to account for changing traffic patterns. You'd think not wasting your citizens' time, helping them get to their families at a decent hour would be a high priority for local government, but you'd be wrong.
The other problem is that the local government entities mostly worry these days about getting sued because litigation is so obscenely expensive. So 20 years ago, you probably remember, red lights would routinely go to blinker from about 11 p.m. to 5 a.m., but they don't do that any more because they don't want to get sued if someone has an accident.