The market opened down about 1800 today and trading was halted for about 15 minutes. It looks like we could see a big crash today.
The market opened down about 1800 today and trading was halted for about 15 minutes. It looks like we could see a big crash today.
Any hedge fund that isnt limit short here isnt doing their job.
Also I held a theory that the recent spike in the market was due to leverage on robin hood. New investors like the spike in bitcoin. I imagine they are all wiped out now.
LdN
For anybody who's kept a big cash hoard, there's a wonderful opportunity here.
Even assuming the US government has totally bungled this, this virus will spread through the US population, and, with or without a vaccine, it will be over in 18-24 months. The economy should be fine when the crisis passes. And the market will bounce back before the economy does.
Not that it won't be horrific -- we might see 3 to 5 million Americans die; it's going to touch every family. I'm speaking purely financially. Stocks are basically 20% off now. Maybe they will get to 40% off. It's a buying opportunity either way as long as you can afford to be patient.
3-5 million die? My guess is that's 2-3 orders of magnitude too high.
I don't see any scenario where 3 - 5 million Americans die and I doubt the worldwide death toll will even get anywhere near that. This is not the plague of the middle ages.3-5 million die? My guess is that's 2-3 orders of magnitude too high.
He also said that Clifford could not run the ball. So ...3-5 million die? My guess is that's 2-3 orders of magnitude too high.
3-5 million die? My guess is that's 2-3 orders of magnitude too high.
Hope so. A 1 percent death rate is 3.2 million souls in the US. And the death rate in Italy right now is holding steady at 3.5 percent even with all the drastic measures that have been taken to slow the thing down.
To me that is the main bad news -- so many people are dying despite modern health care in Italy -- because the hospitals just can't keep up with the large number of critically ill people.
Right now 15% of people get seriously ill and 5% become critically ill. But those numbers are roughly double for over-65.
Here's the math for Berks County, where my dad lives. 400k people. Over-65 population is 17 percent which is just shy of 70,000 people. 70k x 10% would be 7,000 people who need a hospital bed with some life support. And that's just the elderly.... Young people get severely ill too, just not in the same numbers.
Meanwhile Reading Hospital (which is a wonderful hospital by the way) has 750 acute care beds and around 40-50 ICU beds. And it's not like those beds are empty now just waiting for coronavirus patients. St Joseph's is the other hospital in town and they have 20 ICU beds.
If Berks County runs out of hospital beds and has to set up cots in high school gyms, a lot of people will die, a lot more than 3.5%. The only hope is drastic public health measures to keep elderly people from getting the virus. Everybody with elderly loved ones is going to be having to figure this out.
probably much less in rural and suburban areas.Hope so. A 1 percent death rate is 3.2 million souls in the US. And the death rate in Italy right now is holding steady at 3.5 percent even with all the drastic measures that have been taken to slow the thing down.
To me that is the main bad news -- so many people are dying despite modern health care in Italy -- because the hospitals just can't keep up with the large number of critically ill people.
Right now 15% of people get seriously ill and 5% become critically ill. But those numbers are roughly double for over-65.
Here's the math for Berks County, where my dad lives. 400k people. Over-65 population is 17 percent which is just shy of 70,000 people. 70k x 10% would be 7,000 people who need a hospital bed with some life support. And that's just the elderly.... Young people get severely ill too, just not in the same numbers.
Meanwhile Reading Hospital (which is a wonderful hospital by the way) has 750 acute care beds and around 40-50 ICU beds. And it's not like those beds are empty now just waiting for coronavirus patients. St Joseph's is the other hospital in town and they have 20 ICU beds.
If Berks County runs out of hospital beds and has to set up cots in high school gyms, a lot of people will die, a lot more than 3.5%. The only hope is drastic public health measures to keep elderly people from getting the virus. Everybody with elderly loved ones is going to be having to figure this out.
Hope so. A 1 percent death rate is 3.2 million souls in the US. And the death rate in Italy right now is holding steady at 3.5 percent even with all the drastic measures that have been taken to slow the thing down.
To me that is the main bad news -- so many people are dying despite modern health care in Italy -- because the hospitals just can't keep up with the large number of critically ill people.
Right now 15% of people get seriously ill and 5% become critically ill. But those numbers are roughly double for over-65.
Here's the math for Berks County, where my dad lives. 400k people. Over-65 population is 17 percent which is just shy of 70,000 people. 70k x 10% would be 7,000 people who need a hospital bed with some life support. And that's just the elderly.... Young people get severely ill too, just not in the same numbers.
Meanwhile Reading Hospital (which is a wonderful hospital by the way) has 750 acute care beds and around 40-50 ICU beds. And it's not like those beds are empty now just waiting for coronavirus patients. St Joseph's is the other hospital in town and they have 20 ICU beds.
If Berks County runs out of hospital beds and has to set up cots in high school gyms, a lot of people will die, a lot more than 3.5%. The only hope is drastic public health measures to keep elderly people from getting the virus. Everybody with elderly loved ones is going to be having to figure this out.
You're both right. tboyer's numbers are too high but the principle is the same. The problem will be running out hospital beds for the seriously ill. You're almost better off being in the first wave of people who get the virus.I think the denominator in the death rate is those that become infected, not the entire population.
Hope so. A 1 percent death rate is 3.2 million souls in the US. And the death rate in Italy right now is holding steady at 3.5 percent even with all the drastic measures that have been taken to slow the thing down.
To me that is the main bad news -- so many people are dying despite modern health care in Italy -- because the hospitals just can't keep up with the large number of critically ill people.
Right now 15% of people get seriously ill and 5% become critically ill. But those numbers are roughly double for over-65.
Here's the math for Berks County, where my dad lives. 400k people. Over-65 population is 17 percent which is just shy of 70,000 people. 70k x 10% would be 7,000 people who need a hospital bed with some life support. And that's just the elderly.... Young people get severely ill too, just not in the same numbers.
Meanwhile Reading Hospital (which is a wonderful hospital by the way) has 750 acute care beds and around 40-50 ICU beds. And it's not like those beds are empty now just waiting for coronavirus patients. St Joseph's is the other hospital in town and they have 20 ICU beds.
If Berks County runs out of hospital beds and has to set up cots in high school gyms, a lot of people will die, a lot more than 3.5%. The only hope is drastic public health measures to keep elderly people from getting the virus. Everybody with elderly loved ones is going to be having to figure this out.
I think the denominator in the death rate is those that become infected, not the entire population.
, they might even finally get rid of those awful wind blowing hand driers nobody uses.
ah, the silver lining. i hate those things.
Yes but this thing is as infectious as a cold -- it spreads everywhere people cough and sneeze, which is .. everywhere. So anybody not a hermit will be exposed, it's just a matter of time.
And really time is the key -- the more governments can slow down the spread, the more time for treatments and countermeasures and vaccine to be invented, the more people will live.
I don't think it would be safe to assume that this will only reach SOME of the population. Unless we have a lot of people living in caves that I don't know about.
I disagree. Look at cruise ships, practically a petri dish for viruses. 3000 customers and 1000 crew members..all in a giant container.....walking close together in narrow hallways....eating together in large cafeterias....attending large stage shows......off-boarding on gangplanks and then getting on tour buses..... locked together for weeks at a time......yet only 30-40 are getting sick.Yes but this thing is as infectious as a cold -- it spreads everywhere people cough and sneeze, which is .. everywhere. So anybody not a hermit will be exposed, it's just a matter of time.
And really time is the key -- the more governments can slow down the spread, the more time for treatments and countermeasures and vaccine to be invented, the more people will live.
I don't think it would be safe to assume that this will only reach SOME of the population. Unless we have a lot of people living in caves that I don't know about.
You need to walk me though your timeline:Seems like this has been mismanaged from the get go. Considering we have had months to get ready. We should have been getting ready with testing kits with the lead time we had. and it seems now we are caught with our pants down. This should have been a mitigation strategy from the start once it was seen what was going on in China rather than ignore and it will surely go away strategy.
Are you serious? This was only identified on Jan 7th by the Chinese.... just two months ago. Then they wouldn't allow CDC, NIH, or WHO scientists into the country and then restricted their access once permitted entry. So that means we have only had samples to work with for less than six weeks.Seems like this has been mismanaged from the get go. Considering we have had months to get ready. We should have been getting ready with testing kits with the lead time we had. and it seems now we are caught with our pants down. This should have been a mitigation strategy from the start once it was seen what was going on in China rather than ignore and it will surely go away strategy.
The market opened down about 1800 today and trading was halted for about 15 minutes. It looks like we could see a big crash today.
I was in the hospital with the flu and got tested for Corona in mid January FWIW.Considering we have had months to get ready. We should have been getting ready with testing kits with the lead time we had.
Tests don't come out of nowhere--they had to be designed first and tested. There was no "test box on a shelf" anywhere. Good science sometimes takes time.Seems like this has been mismanaged from the get go. Considering we have had months to get ready. We should have been getting ready with testing kits with the lead time we had. and it seems now we are caught with our pants down. This should have been a mitigation strategy from the start once it was seen what was going on in China rather than ignore and it will surely go away strategy.
You're being silly. You have no basis for these hyperbolic comments. China, for instance, had a terribly slow/poor initial reaction, and now that they finally acted firmly and decisively, new cases have virtually been eliminated, with only <81K total (known) infected. China's total population is <1.4B.
There's a happy medium between your "we're all gonna get it! run for your lives! get your affairs in order before you die!" paranoia, and Trump's "we have the perfect coronavirus strategy ... just my hunch because I want to downplay it for political gain and stick it to anyone who criticizes me, rather than be a leader the country wants" nonsense.
So it will not be nearly as bad as this years flu.For anybody who's kept a big cash hoard, there's a wonderful opportunity here.
Even assuming the US government has totally bungled this, this virus will spread through the US population, and, with or without a vaccine, it will be over in 18-24 months. The economy should be fine when the crisis passes. And the market will bounce back before the economy does.
Not that it won't be horrific -- we might see 3 to 5 million Americans die; it's going to touch every family. I'm speaking purely financially. Stocks are basically 20% off now. Maybe they will get to 40% off. It's a buying opportunity either way as long as you can afford to be patient.
Try to disagree with people without going ad hominem. Everybody's on the same side here.
Actually China's experience could be a cakewalk compared to what the US is facing. China is a military dictatorship and they basically walled off large cities, built giant field hospitals in a matter of days, imposed martial law basically nationwide. So they may be able to control it. Looks like Korea will be able to control it.
But the US isn't a military dictatorship and isn't even trying to control it -- the virus is spreading as we speak city to city and we don't know where because there is essentially no testing.
There is no strategy for walling it off -- not that it's easy to wall off a disease that is spread by asymptomatic people who have no idea they're infected. Any disease that is "community" spread -- by strangers sharing the same space -- is super hard to stop in a free society.
And I'm not blaming the US leadership yet -- the response has been dreadful but it's not clear that even an ideal response would stop this thing. Italy's health care system is one of the world's best and they are overwhelmed right now.
Sure -- 73. My response was in relation to the incompleteness of your original statement.You really can't find this out yourself?? Sad that our educational system has failed you.
Sure -- 73. My response was in relation to the incompleteness of your original statement.
Please explain this to me. What should we have done better to have prevented tanking the markets?The virus is not tanking the markets. The idiotic, less-efficient-than-Italy government response is tanking the markets.
I guess that depends on whether you concede that DT has screwed up the virus defense. If you do not, then I cannot help you.Please explain this to me. What should we have done better to have prevented tanking the markets?
Seems like this has been mismanaged from the get go. Considering we have had months to get ready. We should have been getting ready with testing kits with the lead time we had. and it seems now we are caught with our pants down. This should have been a mitigation strategy from the start once it was seen what was going on in China rather than ignore and it will surely go away strategy
If only we could get people to wash their hands. Who can we blame that on?