ADVERTISEMENT

Pennsylvania child welfare officials & Second Mile charity protected Jerry Sandusky, not kids (link)

Bushwood CC

Well-Known Member
Nov 17, 2009
14,202
638
1
Never read this when it was written or published - despite how undeniably correct it is, none of these many Pennsylvania Agencies have ever been investigated or held to account in any way whatsoever -- see hotlink to article below:

Pennsylvania child welfare officials and Second Mile charity
protected Jerry Sandusky, not kids


Yes, that should have changed, but it never has and the only way that is possible is massive corruption and tyranny within Pennsylvania's Government whereby "sovereign authority" and resources is dedicated to propagating the "status quo" and protecting the worst and most corrupt among us than its original stated purpose (e.g., Pennsylvamia, and most of the US has become "Modern Rome" where the most depraved and corrupt are protected and the citizenry is treated like commodities and chattel - "pigs to slaughter").
 
Never read this when it was written or published - despite how undeniably correct it is, none of these many Pennsylvania Agencies have ever been investigated or held to account in any way whatsoever -- see hotlink to article below:

Pennsylvania child welfare officials and Second Mile charity
protected Jerry Sandusky, not kids


Yes, that should have changed, but it never has and the only way that is possible is massive corruption and tyranny within Pennsylvania's Government whereby "sovereign authority" and resources is dedicated to propagating the "status quo" and protecting the worst and most corrupt among us than its original stated purpose (e.g., Pennsylvamia, and most of the US has become "Modern Rome" where the most depraved and corrupt are protected and the citizenry is treated like commodities and chattel - "pigs to slaughter").
Story was written in 2013, it's a shame no one could recognize what was going on long before that. Way too much money and good feelings to really look at the core problems of this supposed charity. Also no mention of JS being able to adopt during those years and the background checks (not) that were done.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WeR0206 and nits74
The mandate to protect TSM and State Agencies entrusted with the care of children in Pa., is obvious when you look at the gerrymandering nature of the investigation and prosecution by the OAG.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nits74
Story was written in 2013, it's a shame no one could recognize what was going on long before that. Way too much money and good feelings to really look at the core problems of this supposed charity. Also no mention of JS being able to adopt during those years and the background checks (not) that were done.

You clearly didn't read the article - this excerpted directly from article:

******************************************
Children and Youth: A wall of protection for Jerry, not kids

In its tax returns, Second Mile would list its mission simply as, "Children & Youth."

All these community leaders involved with Second Mile could not suspect, nor would they want to suspect, that Sandusky perhaps had started it all, among other benevolent reasons, so that he could sexually molest a fresh supply and steady stream of young boys.

This was perhaps the second-most diabolical part of Sandusky's long-running crime spree.

In knitting together his cozy and well-connected network of prominent university, business and community leaders, Jerry Sandusky, wittingly or not, built a thick and nearly impenetrable wall of protection around him.

Who would suspect, or want to suspect, that all these good and well-meaning community leaders were in reality sending thousands of helpless children to Penn State's main campus to be picked out and sexually molested under everyone's noses by Jerry Sandusky?

Years later, in his opening statement at Sandusky's 2012 trial, Pennsylvania attorney general prosecutor Joe McGettigan would tell jurors, "The Second Mile, no matter what it’s reported purpose, was a victim factory for the defendant, an assembly line for adolescent children to be abused, sodomized, and anally raped."

What prosecutor McGettigan neglected to mention was this: The Second Mile may have been an assembly line, but the parts suppliers, incredibly, included the state's children and youth agencies, and school guidance counselors.

The Second Mile may have been an assembly line, but its showroom and front office was aided, abetted, and even staffed by an unknown number of officials and contractors at Penn State, the Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare, and prosecutor McGettigan's own attorney general's office.



To run its programs for its stated mission -- "Children & Youth" -- the Second Mile, and Jerry Sandusky, needed, well, children and youth.

In a subterfuge Dickens himself would dare not write, county children and youth agencies and officers throughout Pennsylvania, as well as school guidance counselors, were enlisted to refer and send kids to the Second Mile, and Sandusky.

All these children and youth officers and guidance counselors would, over the coming decades, pack off thousands of unsuspecting kids to Sandusky's summer overnight camps and programs, like the Summer Challenge Camp.

For decades, these hundreds of children and youth officials and school guidance counselors failed to realize that they were in fact supplying victims to a child molester.

Think about it: Your job is to protect and help kids. You naturally are not particularly keen nor are you eager to have it widely advertised or known that you instead for decades actively went out of your way to turn kids over to a child predator.

This too for a long time would work in Sandusky's favor.

The depth and diabolical nature of his crime would help make it increasingly difficult to believe, and so to stop.



The Second Mile's -- and Sandusky's -- unholy connections to CYS agencies and officials didn't stop with county children and youth offices.

Sandusky and the Second Mile for decades enjoyed and benefited from close connections with state officials within the state attorney general's office, the Pennsylvania Department of State, and the Department of Public Welfare in Harrisburg.

As a charity, the Second Mile was registered with the Department of State.

But the real job of policing and investigating charities like the Second Mile fell to the state attorney general's office Charitable Trusts and Organizations Section.

That office in recent years would also fail to adequately ferret out trouble in other state charities involving kids, like the Hershey Trust.

The Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare, like the AG's office, not only failed to protect kids in the Sandusky and Hershey Trust cases, but also failed its mission in the long-running Luzerne County court's Cash for Kids scandal, where some 6,500 kids for years were sold down the river to private detention facilities whose owners had bribed county judges.

The Sandusky, Hershey Trust, and Luzerne County Cash for Kids scandals all have this in common: kids in Pennsylvania had been reduced to commodities.

The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania since the early 1980s licensed the Second Mile's stand-alone foster home on Bernal Road in State College.

Over the years Sandusky and his wife Dottie personally were approved to adopt six kids, and to serve as a foster parent, activities which by law ultimately are overseen by the state.

As the ties of these regulatory agencies to the Sanduskys grew closer, the ties between the agencies and to the kids they were meant to protect grew ever more distant and abstract.

These ties between Second Mile and the regulators didn't stop with the Sanduskys.

By 1998, Second Mile's fulltime executive director and president, Jack Raykovitz, earned a $76,000 salary from the charity. By 2011, Raykovitz would be making a salary of $132,000. His wife, Katherine Genovese, would be making more than $100,000.

Raykovitz was a licensed child psychologist who at the same time held a side contract with Centre County's Children and Youth agency to conduct examinations of children.

Raykovitz was working for and advising both the regulated and the regulators.

The DPW and CYS regulators have yet to be called to account for any of this.

That should change.

-- Bill Keisling

Posted January 26, 2013
*****************************************
 
Great find, GR. Also, Amendola goes into amazing detail about why Jerry never took the stand, as promised:

The prosecutors, Amendola said, "Contacted me by phone somewhere, I believe it was 8:00 or 8:30 p.m., and advised me that Matt Sandusky, Jerry Sandusky's son, had approached them, had interviewed with them, and made a statement that his father had abused him and that they potentially intended to use this testimony, this evidence at trial.

"Now, up until that time, Your Honor, Mr. Sandusky had always wanted to testify on his own behalf. He always wanted to tell people his side to the allegations in this case. However, that potential evidence, whether true or not, was so devastating and so is -- I think (prosecutor Frank) Fina has used the term in the past so nuclear to his defense, from that point on we were very concerned whether or not Mr. Sandusky could testify.

"Mr. Fina later narrowed the scope of that potential damage by indicating to me that the Commonwealth would agree not to call Matt Sandusky in its case in chief but reserved the right to call him as a rebuttal witness should evidence come out at trial that would allow him to testify and more specifically, obviously, if Mr. Sandusky testified at trial, which still left us with a grave concern."

"...Our position on the Matt Sandusky development coming literally at the close of the Commonwealth's case basically took the heart out of our defense, because our defense was going to be Mr. Sandusky testifying.

"Today, after we called our last fact and character witness, the Court gave us time to consult with Mr. Sandusky as to whether or not he wanted to testify with all this information before him, and he decided that he did not want to testify for the reasons I have set forth."
 
You clearly didn't read the article - this excerpted directly from article:

******************************************
Children and Youth: A wall of protection for Jerry, not kids

In its tax returns, Second Mile would list its mission simply as, "Children & Youth."

All these community leaders involved with Second Mile could not suspect, nor would they want to suspect, that Sandusky perhaps had started it all, among other benevolent reasons, so that he could sexually molest a fresh supply and steady stream of young boys.

This was perhaps the second-most diabolical part of Sandusky's long-running crime spree.

In knitting together his cozy and well-connected network of prominent university, business and community leaders, Jerry Sandusky, wittingly or not, built a thick and nearly impenetrable wall of protection around him.

Who would suspect, or want to suspect, that all these good and well-meaning community leaders were in reality sending thousands of helpless children to Penn State's main campus to be picked out and sexually molested under everyone's noses by Jerry Sandusky?

Years later, in his opening statement at Sandusky's 2012 trial, Pennsylvania attorney general prosecutor Joe McGettigan would tell jurors, "The Second Mile, no matter what it’s reported purpose, was a victim factory for the defendant, an assembly line for adolescent children to be abused, sodomized, and anally raped."

What prosecutor McGettigan neglected to mention was this: The Second Mile may have been an assembly line, but the parts suppliers, incredibly, included the state's children and youth agencies, and school guidance counselors.

The Second Mile may have been an assembly line, but its showroom and front office was aided, abetted, and even staffed by an unknown number of officials and contractors at Penn State, the Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare, and prosecutor McGettigan's own attorney general's office.



To run its programs for its stated mission -- "Children & Youth" -- the Second Mile, and Jerry Sandusky, needed, well, children and youth.

In a subterfuge Dickens himself would dare not write, county children and youth agencies and officers throughout Pennsylvania, as well as school guidance counselors, were enlisted to refer and send kids to the Second Mile, and Sandusky.

All these children and youth officers and guidance counselors would, over the coming decades, pack off thousands of unsuspecting kids to Sandusky's summer overnight camps and programs, like the Summer Challenge Camp.

For decades, these hundreds of children and youth officials and school guidance counselors failed to realize that they were in fact supplying victims to a child molester.

Think about it: Your job is to protect and help kids. You naturally are not particularly keen nor are you eager to have it widely advertised or known that you instead for decades actively went out of your way to turn kids over to a child predator.

This too for a long time would work in Sandusky's favor.

The depth and diabolical nature of his crime would help make it increasingly difficult to believe, and so to stop.



The Second Mile's -- and Sandusky's -- unholy connections to CYS agencies and officials didn't stop with county children and youth offices.

Sandusky and the Second Mile for decades enjoyed and benefited from close connections with state officials within the state attorney general's office, the Pennsylvania Department of State, and the Department of Public Welfare in Harrisburg.

As a charity, the Second Mile was registered with the Department of State.

But the real job of policing and investigating charities like the Second Mile fell to the state attorney general's office Charitable Trusts and Organizations Section.

That office in recent years would also fail to adequately ferret out trouble in other state charities involving kids, like the Hershey Trust.

The Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare, like the AG's office, not only failed to protect kids in the Sandusky and Hershey Trust cases, but also failed its mission in the long-running Luzerne County court's Cash for Kids scandal, where some 6,500 kids for years were sold down the river to private detention facilities whose owners had bribed county judges.

The Sandusky, Hershey Trust, and Luzerne County Cash for Kids scandals all have this in common: kids in Pennsylvania had been reduced to commodities.

The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania since the early 1980s licensed the Second Mile's stand-alone foster home on Bernal Road in State College.

Over the years Sandusky and his wife Dottie personally were approved to adopt six kids, and to serve as a foster parent, activities which by law ultimately are overseen by the state.

As the ties of these regulatory agencies to the Sanduskys grew closer, the ties between the agencies and to the kids they were meant to protect grew ever more distant and abstract.

These ties between Second Mile and the regulators didn't stop with the Sanduskys.

By 1998, Second Mile's fulltime executive director and president, Jack Raykovitz, earned a $76,000 salary from the charity. By 2011, Raykovitz would be making a salary of $132,000. His wife, Katherine Genovese, would be making more than $100,000.

Raykovitz was a licensed child psychologist who at the same time held a side contract with Centre County's Children and Youth agency to conduct examinations of children.

Raykovitz was working for and advising both the regulated and the regulators.

The DPW and CYS regulators have yet to be called to account for any of this.

That should change.

-- Bill Keisling

Posted January 26, 2013
*****************************************
Bush, I did read the article and was making an additional point that you clearly didn't get. JS was able to adopt kids and should have been well vetted to do so. No where in that story is this mentioned. Just more failures by State agencies that should have been looking and evaluating.
 
Bush, I did read the article and was making an additional point that you clearly didn't get. JS was able to adopt kids and should have been well vetted to do so. No where in that story is this mentioned. Just more failures by State agencies that should have been looking and evaluating.

This is excerpted directly from the excerpt I provided in my response to your first response:

***********************************
Overthe years Sandusky and his wife Dottie personally were approved to adopt six kids, and to serve as a foster parent, activities which by law ultimately are overseen by the state.

As the ties of these regulatory agencies to the Sanduskys grew closer, the ties between the agencies and to the kids they were meant to protect grew ever more distant and abstract.
***********************************

The article absolutely does reference The Sandusky's 40+ year relationship with the State Agencies charged with protecting Children in Pennsylvania from monsters like Sandusky via direct regulatory authority and responsibility including DPW/CYS and the OAG via their Nonprofit & Charitable Organizations Division (these relationships between Sandusky and these State Agencies were over 25 years old in 1998 when the State Agencies ABSOLVED Sandusky directly and explicitly in their Official Investigative Report in response to Alysia Chambers' CSA Report via DPW's Child Abuse Hotline - a report which destroyed the Centre County DA's 1998 Case against Sandusky according to UPPD Investigating Detective Ronald Schreffler).
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT