Yes, I used to be a head coach in the WPIAL and never understood why our #7 or 8 needed to be in the state tourney. I've sat in playoff seeding meetings and gone to state meetings. There is no need to have a 32 team bracket. I get the proportional amount of teams in from each region. The proportion does not need to include more than 4 teams no matter the size. If you could not get to the semi's in your district you dont get a shot. Yes I know teams like Aliquippa and others have won from a lower seed. Drop it to 24 teams, give teams a bye, end it a week earlier.
Well for all your past coaching experience, you just seem to be spouting off things that make no sense.
"There's no need to have a 32-team bracket."
- So that's your preference, not based on anything else.
"Drop it to 24 teams, give teams a bye, end it a week earlier."
- Yeah, you've really thought that one out. Currently, with 32 teams, R1 is played on Friday, and R2 is played the next Tuesday. With 24 teams, you'd have 8 that would have byes, and 16 that would play R1 games. The only way you would save any time (not close to a week) would be to have the 8 winners of R1 games play their R2 games a day or two after their R1 game, which would be quite unfair to those teams. So 24 teams would basically take the same amount of time as does 32. In addition, by going to 24 then there would be all kinds of issues to resolve in terms of which teams get byes and which ones have R1 games.
"The proportion does not need to include more than 4 teams no matter the size."
- so now you're advocating screwing schools/athletes from Districts that have most of their schools playing in a specific class, and basically making it easier for schools/athletes from Districts that have very few schools playing in the same class. That makes so much sense.