Counting it in the record books doesn't mean anything--just another way to sell something to naive fansWell, the bowl games count on the record, so meaningless can’t be an accurate description.
Counting it in the record books doesn't mean anything--just another way to sell something to naive fansWell, the bowl games count on the record, so meaningless can’t be an accurate description.
We did just shut-out a Maryland team that went to Michigan and lost 34-27 (gave UM a better game than we did).10-2 is good. The problem is we only played two teams with a pulse and we got embarrassed by both of them. I was thinking our big win was our hang victory against an unranked Purdue team that seemed to be improving but them Purdue just got clobbered by a very average Iowa team. The Auburn win was a nice name win for us but they will finish at the bottom of the SEC and already fired their coach. That is like getting a win against a Scott Frost Nebraska team. It is a nice name win but did you really accomplish anything? For $8M a year I expect Franklin to go toe to toe with Day and Harbaugh regularly and WIN A BOWL GAME regularly which Franklin is dismal at! Win out against the remaining slugs on our schedule and WIN OUR BOWL GAME and then maybe I will start feeling a little optimistic for next year. Although our lack of DL/OL recruiting still has me very worried for next year.
Maryland's QB is no longer healthyWe did just shut-out a Maryland team that went to Michigan and lost 34-27 (gave UM a better game than we did).
Purdue did just go on the road and beat a ranked Illinois team.
Then the fans who want the younger players to play will get their wish. All I keep reading on here is it’s a meaningless game, so those folks should be happy.That’s all great, but what about the top seniors who then decide to sit it out once we get to that major bowl game? How is that fair to the fans who support the whole system?
They feel strongly both ways. LOLThen the fans who want the younger players to play will get their wish. All I keep reading on here is it’s a meaningless game, so those folks should be happy.
Whichever is most convenient and supports their narrative at the time.They feel strongly both ways. LOL
Football generates a hundred million plus and spends it on itself. TV revenue comes to the Big regardless of revenue which we use for all sports. Here’s the reality. Fans are less relevant at all schools. TV calls the shots, and why Ohio state was a noon. Am I disappointed. Yes. But it is what it is. College football has morphed into semi pro ball, because of the failure of the NCAA. I don;t like, but time marches on.That’s all great, but what about the top seniors who then decide to sit it out once we get to that major bowl game? How is that fair to the fans who support the whole system?
You are right,so let me clarify. It is the players who decide whether they are any good in a given year.The team doesn't belong to the players, the team belongs to the University which is made up of students and the alumni.
Jerry - you missed the point. TV only pays the bills because people have interest in the sport and watch. Should the fan support decline over time so does the advertising and subscriptions that fund TV, the revenue to the schools, the NIL $ for players, etc. Piss off enough people and . . . . Both the NFL and NASCAR experienced reduced interest several years ago. The NFL has certainly come back, but I don’t believe NASCAR viewership is anywhere near what it was 5 or even 10 years ago.Football generates a hundred million plus and spends it on itself. TV revenue comes to the Big regardless of revenue which we use for all sports. Here’s the reality. Fans are less relevant at all schools. TV calls the shots, and why Ohio state was a noon. Am I disappointed. Yes. But it is what it is. College football has morphed into semi pro ball, because of the failure of the NCAA. I don;t like, but time marches on.
We are good for at least a decade on the contracts. Northwestern new stadium is only 35,000Jerry - you missed the point. TV only pays the bills because people have interest in the sport and watch. Should the fan support decline over time so does the advertising and subscriptions that fund TV, the revenue to the schools, the NIL $ for players, etc. Piss off enough people and . . . . Both the NFL and NASCAR experienced reduced interest several years ago. The NFL has certainly come back, but I don’t believe NASCAR viewership is anywhere near what it was 5 or even 10 years ago.
Do we even mention Jimbo?So based on Mel Tucker's salary, you expect Michigan State to beat us every year and Sparty ranked in the top five in the country? Got it.