ADVERTISEMENT

Rachel Mitchell's Analysis of Dr. Ford's Allegations

WeR0206

Well-Known Member
Apr 9, 2014
23,465
31,140
1
In short, she blows Dr. Ford out of the water, says she doesn't even meet the preponderance of evidence standard:

"In the legal context, here is my bottom line:
A “he said, she said” case is incredibly difficult to prove. But this case is even weaker than that. Dr. Ford identified other witnesses to the event, and those witnesses either refuted her allegations or failed to corroborate them.
For the reasons discussed below, I do not think that a reasonable prosecutor would bring this
case based on the evidence before the Committee. Nor do I believe that this evidence is
sufficient to satisfy the preponderance-of-the-evidence standard."

gimp-2.10_2018-09-27_13-21-34_compressed.jpg



https://www.neonrevolt.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/Rachel-Mitchell-s-analysis.pdf
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT

Go Big.
Get Premium.

Join Rivals to access this premium section.

  • Say your piece in exclusive fan communities.
  • Unlock Premium news from the largest network of experts.
  • Dominate with stats, athlete data, Rivals250 rankings, and more.
Log in or subscribe today Go Back