ADVERTISEMENT

Recruiting numbers and who leaves.

I wonder how many kids actually graduate in 3 1/2 years? Few regular students are able to do this and they don't have the athletic commitment. Also, some of these kids aren't the best students to begin with. I'd be surprised if 1/4 of them graduate in 3 1/2 years.
Remember...they are taking Summer classes -3 Summers. Even without 'full loads' 3.5 years is not a problem to Graduate. Most guys know where they are in the pecking order. 2 choices.... graduate and move on OR transfer to get playing time.
 
Not saying these are gone but some in this group will be gone. All gonna be 5th year seniors except Barkely who is gone.

Also read today that Tommy Stevens graduates in the spring. He could transfer and play somewhere right away having 2 years left. I would especially be concerned he could follow Moorhead knowing his system at the new school.

Torrence Brown
Jake Cooper
Koa Farmer
Manny Bowen
Saquon Barkley (NFL)
Chaz Wright
Jonathan Thomas
Mark Allen
Nick Scott
DeAndre Thompkins

DeAndre will be the top receiver going into next year--he's not going anywhere
Nick Scott has been playing lots lately
Manny Bowen isn't going anywhere unless he's ineligible or kicked off team and I doubt that happens
Koa Famer--is a starter
All others are possible.
 
I understand that these kids take classes during the summer but I assume they take less than a full load during the season.

Forget about forcing kids out for the moment. Assume we sign 25 this year. That means 9 have to go. What if only 6 leave voluntarily?
That's a good question. Hopefully someone knows the answer. Uncle Lar?

I'll take a guess though. Since we (yes, PSU started offering 4 year scholarships before the Big Ten adopted the policy) offer 4 year scholarships, 3 players from the 2014 class that were planning on staying would have to leave. I doubt any of the newly signed recruits could be forced out without clear cause.
 
Instead of mob action against a prospective coach at Tennessee, why don’t we just pick and choose the 8-10 players we don’t want to come back?

AND

Someone here needs to take the personal responsibility to meet with Franklin and make sure he understands what he needs to do.


I’ll pass on the roster issues, I’ve already had the meeting on the O game plans and play calling with him and Moorhead.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rip_E_2_Joe_PA
Great! Give us your names. You are another who presses for the 25 scholarship limit. In order to hit 25 scholarships, 9 players have to go. Who are they?


First, why would a fan want anyone to go, as you put it? Because they did not sign little nephew Bobbies football at the Blue White game? Because the fan doesn't like the players normal facial expression? It does not matter who anyone wants to go, what does matter is who is going to go and why they are going? You have perhaps created the most idiotic thread in board history. The coaches and the players hold the cards and have their reasons, the program does not talk about injuries, guys have aspirations to play more, guys have aspirations to attend a grad school program that PSU does not offer and still play football or not,

Your idea so,,,,Who do you want to Go Napper and why? Then we will all chime in with our individual nephew Bobbie stories.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ILLINOISLION
Here's a question.... Can a guy who has a year of scholarship left give up that scholarship and play as a walk on? Say the guy earned a full academic scholarship or graduated early and got a grad school grant or scholarship? Anybody know?
 
That's what they say but I wonder about the legal workarounds.

PSU has already recruited more than they have room for. What if none of the kids agree to leave voluntarily? Some kids will be 5th year seniors so I guess you could decide not to renew their scholarships.
Oruwariye
Brown
Wright
McSorley
Thompkins
J. Thomas
M. Allen

I don't think we want to lose most of those guys and I don't think any are NFL ready. But if every one of these kids plus Barkley left early that still wouldn't be enough to allow us to take 25.
We're not going to ask a kid to leave early for the sake of more space. Kids who leave will be kids with degrees heading into year 5 who won't contribute much. Or others who are already looking at other opportunities.
Chaz Wright will stay. He is going to contribute.
Jenkins and Zambiac most likely have already started the process of applying at other schools.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Agoodnap
We're not going to ask a kid to leave early for the sake of more space. Kids who leave will be kids with degrees heading into year 5 who won't contribute much. Or others who are already looking at other opportunities.
Chaz Wright will stay. He is going to contribute.
Jenkins and Zambiac most likely have already started the process of applying at other schools.

"Most likely" Are you basing that on something you know or something you presume?
 
We're not going to ask a kid to leave early for the sake of more space. Kids who leave will be kids with degrees heading into year 5 who won't contribute much. Or others who are already looking at other opportunities.
Chaz Wright will stay. He is going to contribute.
Jenkins and Zambiac most likely have already started the process of applying at other schools.
There aren't nearly enough 5th year seniors who don't contribute.

Some underclassmen will leave voluntarily in hopes of finding playing time elsewhere but that can really complicate degree aspirations. They also have to make new friends. I'm sure a lot of kids don't want to do that.
 
First, why would a fan want anyone to go, as you put it? Because they did not sign little nephew Bobbies football at the Blue White game? Because the fan doesn't like the players normal facial expression? It does not matter who anyone wants to go, what does matter is who is going to go and why they are going? You have perhaps created the most idiotic thread in board history. The coaches and the players hold the cards and have their reasons, the program does not talk about injuries, guys have aspirations to play more, guys have aspirations to attend a grad school program that PSU does not offer and still play football or not,

Your idea so,,,,Who do you want to Go Napper and why? Then we will all chime in with our individual nephew Bobbie stories.
Grow up!
 
That's a good question. Hopefully someone knows the answer. Uncle Lar?

I'll take a guess though. Since we (yes, PSU started offering 4 year scholarships before the Big Ten adopted the policy) offer 4 year scholarships, 3 players from the 2014 class that were planning on staying would have to leave. I doubt any of the newly signed recruits could be forced out without clear cause.

They take 12cr during the season. Nothing less than full time.
 
Napper:

Nice try, but you are dealing with a consortium of nit-wits.

For years they decry the "processing" done at OTHER programs. But when it comes to PSU, they will deny "math" and spew every alibi in the book.

Personally, I wish Penn State had remained as a program that truly honored four-year commitments to all recruits. If it were up to me - and it isn't - I would prefer that, even though it meant that the recruiting classes would be somewhat smaller (and it could negatively impact the chance for "championship" seasons).
It is probably the one thing that I disagree with CJF about - though I would not be overly critical of his actions: They are certainly geared towards enhancing the team's ability to win, they are clearly in line with the desires of most of the program's supporters, and they are certainly the norm for the programs Penn State competes against.
So, while I don't like it, I won't criticize him for it.

What I do find deplorable, is the idiocy of those hypocrites who try to ignore the basic facts.

What player since Franklin has been here has been "processed" and left here disgruntled? Please provide links and quotes.
 
Napper:

Nice try, but you are dealing with a consortium of nit-wits.

For years they decry the "processing" done at OTHER programs. But when it comes to PSU, they will deny "math" and spew every alibi in the book.

Personally, I wish Penn State had remained as a program that truly honored four-year commitments to all recruits. If it were up to me - and it isn't - I would prefer that, even though it meant that the recruiting classes would be somewhat smaller (and it could negatively impact the chance for "championship" seasons).
It is probably the one thing that I disagree with CJF about - though I would not be overly critical of his actions: They are certainly geared towards enhancing the team's ability to win, they are clearly in line with the desires of most of the program's supporters, and they are certainly the norm for the programs Penn State competes against.
So, while I don't like it, I won't criticize him for it.

What I do find deplorable, is the idiocy of those hypocrites who try to ignore the basic facts.
Franklin is now doing what a lot of other programs are doing when it comes to having players move on.
When it becomes evident things won't work out it's not like he tells the kid move on then walks away.
He sits down with the kid and his family and advises them of the situation And offers his help in getting the kid to the right program he may desire. Be it phone calls, letters of recommendation, or good use of contacts.
Think something like that happened with Antoine White who ended up at a smaller school.
 
Who said they were "disgruntled"?

Find me a quote from any of the players that - according to the posters on this Board, were "processed" by programs like Alabama - that expressed "disgruntlement"?
And yet, the hypocrites here moaned incessantly in the past about Saban's "roster management". Right?

As I said, I am not going to be critical of it - but I ain't gonna' be a nit-wit-hypocrite either.

Pot/Kettle.

LOL

Players, and I'm going to go out on a limb here, want to "play". If they are told that realistically they have no shot to ever see the field here, many/most of them will want to go somewhere where they can.

It hasn't been an issue here, but don't let that stop you from trying to create one.

HTTP2Jsb2cuY2hyb24uY29tL3R1YnVsYXIvZmlsZXMvMjAxNS8wMi9wYW5pYy1hdHRhY2stYXJyZXN0ZWQtZGV2ZWxvcG1lbnQtYnVzdGVyLmdpZgloglog.gif
 
Uh....which is exactly what I said. Right?
Sometimes it just needs to be written out for some (not you) who think this is HS or the pros where a coach walks in tells, the guy he is gone, then walks out the door.
Or they just follow recruiting and want to know why we can't accomadate x amount of kids.
 
When the NCAA changed the rules that allowed incoming student-athlete freshmen to take summer classes before their first fall semester it changed the whole situation. Now an incoming freshman can have say 6 credits under their belt before the fall as well as working out with the S&C coaches before fall practice.

Also now about 99% (if not all) are on campus all summer long taking classes. Basketball has been doing this for a while now because basketball players take only about 12 credits both fall and spring because of travel.

Football (an estimate) now takes a course load like this:
Freshman Summer 6 credits
Fr Fall 12 credits
Fr Spring 15
First year 33 total
Soph Summer 6-9
Soph Fall 12
Soph Spring 15
Second year 33-36 (total 66-69)
Jr Summer 6-9
Jr Fall 12
Jr Spring 15
Third year 33-36 (Total 99-105)
Sr summer (6-9)
Sr Fall 12. (117-120)
Then if necessary finish up in Spring.

So of course this aggressive, and there will be some players that will take 15 credits in the fall during the season. I doubt that they would limit to only 12, if they think that they can handle 15.

Maybe the majority of them take 15 in the fall and then drop to 12 if necessary. So you can see how they can finish early.

Disclaimer my math may not be 100% correct as I’m trying to finish in a hurry.
 
When the NCAA changed the rules that allowed incoming student-athlete freshmen to take summer classes before their first fall semester it changed the whole situation. Now an incoming freshman can have say 6 credits under their belt before the fall as well as working out with the S&C coaches before fall practice.

Also now about 99% (if not all) are on campus all summer long taking classes. Basketball has been doing this for a while now because basketball players take only about 12 credits both fall and spring because of travel.

Football (an estimate) now takes a course load like this:
Freshman Summer 6 credits
Fr Fall 12 credits
Fr Spring 15
First year 33 total
Soph Summer 6-9
Soph Fall 12
Soph Spring 15
Second year 33-36 (total 66-69)
Jr Summer 6-9
Jr Fall 12
Jr Spring 15
Third year 33-36 (Total 99-105)
Sr summer (6-9)
Sr Fall 12. (117-120)
Then if necessary finish up in Spring.

So of course this aggressive, and there will be some players that will take 15 credits in the fall during the season. I doubt that they would limit to only 12, if they think that they can handle 15.

Maybe the majority of them take 15 in the fall and then drop to 12 if necessary. So you can see how they can finish early.

Disclaimer my math may not be 100% correct as I’m trying to finish in a hurry.

Your numbers are good, and illustrate how it is nearly impossible (at least very ambitious) that any kid would be expected to graduate - with a meaningful degree - any earlier than his "4th year of playing football", ie the "3 1/2 year plan" that CJF often refers to.
CJF uses that analogy - or plan, if you will - to illustrate the ability to leave for the NFL after one's 4th fall semester (and spend the requisite time over the winter/spring at the NFL combines and workouts and what not), with a degree in hand.

It is a do-able plan for a kid who is disciplined (and doesn't start out behind - and have to take a first year of remedial classes), but it does require that 4th fall semester.


Yes but that fourth fall is 3 1/2 years in the traditional sense. The end of their 4th season would be 3 1/2 years in school. That is what he is going by when he says graduate in 3 1/2 years.
 
  • Like
Reactions: stormingnorm
Yes but that fourth fall is 3 1/2 years in the traditional sense. The end of their 4th season would be 3 1/2 years in school. That is what he is going by when he says graduate in 3 1/2 years.
I think 3.5 years is a standard benchmark HE wants to use. He knows not all kids are going to do it. But uses it as a goal to show a commitment to academics.
Graduating in 3.5 years is hard enough for the standard student. Let alone those with a huge athletic responsibility
 
Yes but that fourth fall is 3 1/2 years in the traditional sense. The end of their 4th season would be 3 1/2 years in school. That is what he is going by when he says graduate in 3 1/2 years.
I think 3.5 years is a standard benchmark HE wants to use. He knows not all kids are going to do it. But uses it as a goal to show a commitment to academics.
Graduating in 3.5 years is hard enough for the standard student. Let alone those with a huge athletic responsibility

Absolutely agree and it is a monumental feat to do that. But if a player then needs that last spring to finish up even a full semester of credits they will have graduated in 4 years.

If they decide that their playing career is done then they graduate and the team has that scholarship back. If a player decides that they want to transfer and finish at another school as a grad student then they can finish in the spring and transfer for the fall. Again the team get the scholarship back.

In some instances I’m sure the staff will bring back a fifth year player, as i doubt the staff will run off a contributor or even a starter that does need to come back for that last year.

I would bet that it’s being sold to recruits as a goal and a benefit to them because it allows them to keep their options open.

Play right away, be close to graduating leave school early, play in the nfl and still be close enough to finish your degree.

Or then any of the other scenarios we discussed.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT