Regarding the Pepper Hamilton recent motion to keep disclosure materials "confidential":

[bjf1984]

After reading that motion, two thoughts from a "layman":

1 - The info in those documents (essentially the supportive documents from the "Freeh Investigation") must have a hell of a lot more incriminating evidence of malfeasance than anyone would have thought.

2 - Their argument is - from a common sense viewpoint - ludicrous. They are essentially saying that it is completely impossible that the ability of the Plaintiff to actually see the documents would be relevant to the case. Huh???? They are saying that there is no useful purpose to allowing the PLAINTIFFS to review the documents that the Court ordered the DEFENDANTS to produce. Really???



THIS JUST IN:
Lawyers....by and large.....are scumbags (yes, there are exceptions.....sorry Dem ).
It is incredible how that profession - and, largely, those people in that profession - have inflated their self-importance. They seem to feel they live in a world developed and maintained solely for their purposes....and serving only themselves (could we call this perverse psychological deformity "CR66 Syndrome"?).

One could only wish that they - literally - DID live in a world all to themselves. Far away from the ability to infect the rest of us.

 

[MontereyLion]

After reading that motion, two thoughts from a "layman":

1 - The info in those documents (essentially the supportive documents from the "Freeh Investigation") must have a hell of a lot more incriminating evidence of malfeasance than anyone would have thought.

2 - Their argument is - from a common sense viewpoint - ludicrous. They are essentially saying that it is completely impossible that the ability of the Plaintiff to actually see the documents would be relevant to the case. Huh???? They are saying that there is no useful purpose to allowing the PLAINTIFFS to review the documents that the Court ordered the DEFENDANTS to produce. Really???



THIS JUST IN:
Lawyers....by and large.....are scumbags (yes, there are exceptions.....sorry Dem ).
It is incredible how that profession - and, largely, those people in that profession - have inflated their self-importance. They seem to feel they live in a world developed and maintained solely for their purposes....and serving only themselves (could we call this perverse psychological deformity "CR66 Syndrome"?).

One could only wish that they - literally - DID live in a world all to themselves. Far away from the ability to infect the rest of us.

After reading that motion, two thoughts from a "layman":

1 - The info in those documents (essentially the supportive documents from the "Freeh Investigation") must have a hell of a lot more incriminating evidence of malfeasance than anyone would have thought.

2 - Their argument is - from a common sense viewpoint - ludicrous. They are essentially saying that it is completely impossible that the ability of the Plaintiff to actually see the documents would be relevant to the case. Huh???? They are saying that there is no useful purpose to allowing the PLAINTIFFS to review the documents that the Court ordered the DEFENDANTS to produce. Really???



THIS JUST IN:
Lawyers....by and large.....are scumbags (yes, there are exceptions.....sorry Dem ).
It is incredible how that profession - and, largely, those people in that profession - have inflated their self-importance. They seem to feel they live in a world developed and maintained solely for their purposes....and serving only themselves (could we call this perverse psychological deformity "CR66 Syndrome"?).

One could only wish that they - literally - DID live in a world all to themselves. Far away from the ability to infect the rest of us.

If we were living in a perfect world(and we don't) and I were allowed to make an amendment to the Constitution.....mine would be that Lawyers can not serve in the House , Senate nor in the Executive Branch of our Federal Government. That little amendment, in my view, would solve a lot of this countries problems.

 

[psu1969a]

If we were living in a perfect world(and we don't) and I were allowed to make an amendment to the Constitution.....mine would be that Lawyers can not serve in the House , Senate nor in the Executive Branch of our Federal Government. That little amendment, in my view, would solve a lot of this countries problems.

in addition, must include state and local governmental positions and agencies.

 

[91Joe95]

After reading that motion, two thoughts from a "layman":

1 - The info in those documents (essentially the supportive documents from the "Freeh Investigation") must have a hell of a lot more incriminating evidence of malfeasance than anyone would have thought.

2 - Their argument is - from a common sense viewpoint - ludicrous. They are essentially saying that it is completely impossible that the ability of the Plaintiff to actually see the documents would be relevant to the case. Huh???? They are saying that there is no useful purpose to allowing the PLAINTIFFS to review the documents that the Court ordered the DEFENDANTS to produce. Really???



THIS JUST IN:
Lawyers....by and large.....are scumbags (yes, there are exceptions.....sorry Dem ).
It is incredible how that profession - and, largely, those people in that profession - have inflated their self-importance. They seem to feel they live in a world developed and maintained solely for their purposes....and serving only themselves (could we call this perverse psychological deformity "CR66 Syndrome"?).

One could only wish that they - literally - DID live in a world all to themselves. Far away from the ability to infect the rest of us.

Penn State's paying them for that?!? Where's the bot and their fiscal responsibility when you need it? Barron and his cohorts are ruining this university.

 

[Rip_E_2_Joe_PA]

in addition, must include state and local governmental positions and agencies.

In addition must include all BS GOB network corporate positions ... especially risk managers... or reward dismantlers which ever way you look at it.

 

[MontereyLion]

In addition must include all BS GOB network corporate positions ... especially risk managers... or reward dismantlers which ever way you look at it.

Let's start our own country. This one has gotten off track.