ADVERTISEMENT

Robert Smith getting ready to do his Weekly BTN Week 9 Power Rankings....

I think the BIG is now plotting against Wisconsin. Madison is behind in its cheddar payments.

wi-custom-ch.png

 
I think the BIG is now plotting against Wisconsin. Madison is behind in its cheddar payments.

Plotting against Wisconsin? Wisconsin has an inferior conference record to PSU - they're 4-2 and PSU is 5-1. PSU's and Wisconsin's 3 common opponents are scUM, daO$U and Iowa - PSU is 2-1 against the common opponents, while Wisconsin is 1-2. Even the 1 win that Iowa has against the 3 common opponents, Iowa, PSU clearly looked exponentially more dominant against Iowa (Wisconsin beat Iowa 17-9, but Iowa was in the game to their final drive where they just barely failed to score.....while PSU freight-trained Iowa from the opening kick-off.). Yea, putting PSU back over Wisconsin where Smith had them Week 6 before dropping PSU during a bye week and raising Wisconsin for LOSING to daO$U is really "plotting against Wisconsin".....LMFAO.....only in the eyes of a douche Shizholean homer.
 
Plotting against Wisconsin? Wisconsin has an inferior conference record to PSU - they're 4-2 and PSU is 5-1. PSU's and Wisconsin's 3 common opponents are scUM, daO$U and Iowa - PSU is 2-1 against the common opponents, while Wisconsin is 1-2. Even the 1 win that Iowa has against the 3 common opponents, Iowa, PSU clearly looked exponentially more dominant against Iowa (Wisconsin beat Iowa 17-9, but Iowa was in the game to their final drive where they just barely failed to score.....while PSU freight-trained Iowa from the opening kick-off.). Yea, putting PSU back over Wisconsin where Smith had them Week 6 before dropping PSU during a bye week and raising Wisconsin for LOSING to daO$U is really "plotting against Wisconsin".....LMFAO.....only in the eyes of a douche Shizholean homer.
Omg
 
All due respect to Mr. Smith (well, not really), but didn't we beat tosu? Being ranked ahead of us merely screams of his homerism.
 
Plotting against Wisconsin? Wisconsin has an inferior conference record to PSU - they're 4-2 and PSU is 5-1. PSU's and Wisconsin's 3 common opponents are scUM, daO$U and Iowa - PSU is 2-1 against the common opponents, while Wisconsin is 1-2. Even the 1 win that Iowa has against the 3 common opponents, Iowa, PSU clearly looked exponentially more dominant against Iowa (Wisconsin beat Iowa 17-9, but Iowa was in the game to their final drive where they just barely failed to score.....while PSU freight-trained Iowa from the opening kick-off.). Yea, putting PSU back over Wisconsin where Smith had them Week 6 before dropping PSU during a bye week and raising Wisconsin for LOSING to daO$U is really "plotting against Wisconsin".....LMFAO.....only in the eyes of a douche Shizholean homer.

I think they are looking at the entire seasons of both teams. Both have two losses.

Penn State did look better vs Iowa, but arguably looked worse vs both Michigan and Ohio State (despite beating the Buckeyes).

Consider the AP poll, Sagarin, etc. Thinking Wisconsin is the better team is not unusual.
 
I think they are looking at the entire seasons of both teams. Both have two losses.

Penn State did look better vs Iowa, but arguably looked worse vs both Michigan and Ohio State (despite beating the Buckeyes).

Consider the AP poll, Sagarin, etc. Thinking Wisconsin is the better team is not unusual.
Stop. you 'doucheShizholean B1G homer'. :cool:
 
I think they are looking at the entire seasons of both teams. Both have two losses.

Penn State did look better vs Iowa, but arguably looked worse vs both Michigan and Ohio State (despite beating the Buckeyes).

Consider the AP poll, Sagarin, etc. Thinking Wisconsin is the better team is not unusual.
Wait! you are saying PSU looked WORSE against OSU, winning, than Wisky did losing?? Doesn't that sound a bit dumb?
 
Wait! you are saying PSU looked WORSE against OSU, winning, than Wisky did losing?? Doesn't that sound a bit dumb?

No. Did you watch both games?

Did you watch Pitt vs Penn State? Has Wisconsin looked that bad this year?
 
I think they are looking at the entire seasons of both teams. Both have two losses.

Penn State did look better vs Iowa, but arguably looked worse vs both Michigan and Ohio State (despite beating the Buckeyes).

Consider the AP poll, Sagarin, etc. Thinking Wisconsin is the better team is not unusual.

"Looked worse versus Ohio State despite beating the Buckeyes" - LMFAO, only a Shizholian douche, homer, moron could make this statement. Take a hike Shizholian troll.
 
Wait! you are saying PSU looked WORSE against OSU, winning, than Wisky did losing?? Doesn't that sound a bit dumb?

Keep in mind that the douche-bag is a Shizholian homer troll.....who is perfectly unbiased on this topic (i.e., PSU versus the "traditional b1g shizhole") - good stuff, eh??? These homers are tone-deaf to how phucking stupid they sound (and in reality are) - LMFAO!
 
Keep in mind that the douche-bag is a Shizholian homer troll.....who is perfectly unbiased on this topic (i.e., PSU versus the "traditional b1g shizhole") - good stuff, eh??? These homers are tone-deaf to how phucking stupid they sound (and in reality are) - LMFAO!

You should take up your outrage with the Playoff Committee, the AP poll, the Coaches' poll, Sagarin, the Massey index... all of which rank Wisconsin ahead of Penn State.

http://www.usatoday.com/sports/ncaaf/sagarin/
 
Yea, I watched both games and it not only sounds stupid, it is stupid and beyond inane....but typical of a "perfectly unbiased" Shizholian homer, douche moron. LMFAO!

I don't know about "perfect", but I am pretty sure I am less biased than you sir.

Why don't you go on a national board with your argument? See what the rest of the nation thinks about your ranking?
 
I don't know about "perfect", but I am pretty sure I am less biased than you sir.

Why don't you go on a national board with your argument? See what the rest of the nation thinks about your ranking?

Classic! Yea, you're claiming that Wisconsin should get more credit for LOSING to daO$U than PSU BEATING daO$U (including PSU outscoring daO$U 17-0 during the final 23 minutes of the game) is strong evidence of how "unbiased" you are on this topic??? Whatever you say moron - only a completely tone-deaf, homer, Shizholian douche-bag could make such absurd statements while self-proclaiming how "unbiased" they are.....irony doesn't even begin to describe a tool like you, moron.
 
I don't know about "perfect", but I am pretty sure I am less biased than you sir.

Why don't you go on a national board with your argument? See what the rest of the nation thinks about your ranking?

Your trolling works on FRTT because he's pro-PSU-OCD. To the rest of us, it just makes you look lame/stupid. Just an fyi.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bjf1991
For crying out loud, it's one man's subjective opinion that means ABSOLUTELY NOTHING....let it go
 
Your trolling works on FRTT because he's pro-PSU-OCD. To the rest of us, it just makes you look lame/stupid. Just an fyi.

You have a damned low bar for what you consider "trolling". I am only agreeing with 95% of the rest of the country in evaluating the two teams.
 
All due respect to Mr. Smith (well, not really), but didn't we beat tosu? Being ranked ahead of us merely screams of his homerism.

I agree he is simply towing the B10 line, but it is possible he thinks that PSU/OSU were pretty even, but OSU has turned a corner since. I'm not saying I agree with him, I'm just saying I understand. Think of it this way, outside of 17 people in Pittsburgh, no one thinks Pitt is better than PSU at this point in the season, or that PSU wouldn't crush Pitt in a rematch.
 
You have a damned low bar for what you consider "trolling". I am only agreeing with 95% of the rest of the country in evaluating the two teams.

Maybe, but it is simply illogical to say that team A looked better LOSING to team B than team C did in BEATING team B. Wisky may be better than PSU, that may be a fair evaluation based on both teams' entire schedules. But to claim, as you did, that Wisky looked better LOSING to OSU than PSU did in BEATING OSU is really just patently silly and I think the 95% of the country you cite as support for that proposition is laughing at you.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT