I think it might be.Ummmm yeahhhhhh, that isn't all he did or was sent to prison for so you kind of FOS.
I think it might be.Ummmm yeahhhhhh, that isn't all he did or was sent to prison for so you kind of FOS.
Your an idiot
You brought joes testimony out of no where the post your replying to makes no mention of it.
And #2 and #3 are pointless as well both happen with testimony given to a Grand jury so you're saying all Grand Jury testimony needs to be thrown out.
Really what's most embarrassing is this continued call for a new Sandusky trial because it was "unfair" when really you're just hoping for something to come out to exonerate PSU, justice for Jerry's victims be damned. Time to face the fact Jerry is guilty as hell and deserves rot in prison and then rot in hell
this is some Olympic level mental gymnastics.You throw out an opinion, but no logic to back it up. So you are saying all grand jury testimony is gospel, even if the witness was led, and the statements as transcribed don’t make sense and seem to have improper punctuation (something you probably wouldn’t notice based on the quality of your posts), and the person qualified his statement multiple times that he was unsure? You seem incapable of processing all three things happening at once on JVP’s testimony. You can’t just process them separately. You want to throw them out and rely on JVP’s testimony as gospel, when it’s clearly unreliable for multiple reasons.
What’s really embarrassing is this continued bringing up of Sandusky, please stop trying to distract from Bo’s buddy Nassar and stay on topic. PSU doesn’t need exonerated again, it’s already been. Did you miss the NCAA dropping the sanctions? The AG praising Paterno for his actions? The lead prosecutor saying he found no evidence of a cover-up? No PSU admins convicted of any felony charges?
You keep pointing the finger at PSU instead of those professionals at DPW/CYS/TSM that actually failed those kids. Past and future victims be damned. Time to face the fact, you are an enabler.
I'm guessing "your" not going to see the irony in the above statement? Thanks for the entertainment!
This isn't that hard to understand, please re-read that post. It's very clear why JVP's testimony is on-topic in relation to cross examination, and thus was brought up. Don't be afraid to ask for help, you clearly need it.
You throw out an opinion, but no logic to back it up. So you are saying all grand jury testimony is gospel, even if the witness was led, and the statements as transcribed don’t make sense and seem to have improper punctuation (something you probably wouldn’t notice based on the quality of your posts), and the person qualified his statement multiple times that he was unsure? You seem incapable of processing all three things happening at once on JVP’s testimony. You can’t just process them separately. You want to throw them out and rely on JVP’s testimony as gospel, when it’s clearly unreliable for multiple reasons.
What’s really embarrassing is this continued bringing up of Sandusky, please stop trying to distract from Bo’s buddy Nassar and stay on topic. PSU doesn’t need exonerated again, it’s already been. Did you miss the NCAA dropping the sanctions? The AG praising Paterno for his actions? The lead prosecutor saying he found no evidence of a cover-up? No PSU admins convicted of any felony charges?
You keep pointing the finger at PSU instead of those professionals at DPW/CYS/TSM that actually failed those kids. Past and future victims be damned. Time to face the fact, you are an enabler.
too long for pnny...has to be BODE.Biggest mystery is why the UMich troll is spending so much time on a PSU Board flaming regarding Sandusky (and now in a second thread defending Bo Schembechler's relationship with Dr. Nasser which the serial pedophile and rapist gives credit for launching his career in Sports Medicine and Therapy that he used to rape and abuse countless numbers of chidren under his trust)? This guy's hypocrisy is beyond embarrassing but seems pretty standard for most of the trash that emanates out of the State of Michigan and the B1G Conference in general.
this is some Olympic level mental gymnastics.
grand jury testimony is not gospel, it's not used to convict anyone. The questions asked and the answers to those were used to bring an indictment against Jerry Sandusky no one else.
Then you keep deflecting from the topic of this entire thread former PSU DC Jerry Sandusky's attempt at an appeal. It has nothing to do with Paterno, Larry Nassar, or anyone else. No one brought up JVPs testimony other than you and it has nothing to do with Jerry's appeal.
I've never pointed any finger at PSU no idea where you got that from.
This is the best part "What’s really embarrassing is this continued bringing up of Sandusky". THE WHOLE THREAD IS ABOUT JERRY SANDUSKY. I think most sane people can agree It's time to face the fact that you're mentally retarded.
Why would you question the victims? Are you a lawyer or law enforcement individual? Oh wait...you're mad because Jerry molested them and got Joe's name crapped on...nevermind..carry on.
Yes the victims are clearly lying horrible people. It isn't as if the hero of the free jerry crowd has trespassed, harassed victims, possibly assisted someone in committing insurance fraud, outed victims and been arrested and convicted of a crime in his pursuit of being the biggest @hole involved in this whole sordid affair (after Jerry of course). Those victims though, they sure are bullies, a piece of paper typed out, great evidence.
Yes the victims are clearly lying horrible people. It isn't as if the hero of the free jerry crowd has trespassed, harassed victims, possibly assisted someone in committing insurance fraud, outed victims and been arrested and convicted of a crime in his pursuit of being the biggest @hole involved in this whole sordid affair (after Jerry of course). Those victims though, they sure are bullies, a piece of paper typed out, great evidence.
this is some Olympic level mental gymnastics.
grand jury testimony is not gospel, it's not used to convict anyone. The questions asked and the answers to those were used to bring an indictment against Jerry Sandusky no one else.
Then you keep deflecting from the topic of this entire thread former PSU DC Jerry Sandusky's attempt at an appeal. It has nothing to do with Paterno, Larry Nassar, or anyone else. No one brought up JVPs testimony other than you and it has nothing to do with Jerry's appeal.
I've never pointed any finger at PSU no idea where you got that from.
This is the best part "What’s really embarrassing is this continued bringing up of Sandusky". THE WHOLE THREAD IS ABOUT JERRY SANDUSKY. I think most sane people can agree It's time to face the fact that you're mentally retarded.
Who was convicted based on Joe's grand jury testimony? I'd love to hearLMAO. Might want to talk to the Paterno family about that.