SIAP. Article from the Sporting News.
http://www.sportingnews.com/ncaa-fo...r-mayfield-oklahoma/1khoo4th4hk6fz28t78694za8
http://www.sportingnews.com/ncaa-fo...r-mayfield-oklahoma/1khoo4th4hk6fz28t78694za8
The only 3 other players I can remember (I'm sure there's more) as being able to take it to the house on any touch were: Mike Rozier, Barry Sanders, and Adrian Peterson. Them and Barkley were amazing to watch.
SIAP. Article from the Sporting News.
http://www.sportingnews.com/ncaa-fo...r-mayfield-oklahoma/1khoo4th4hk6fz28t78694za8
LJ was robbed, just like Barkley will be.The only 3 other players I can remember (I'm sure there's more) as being able to take it to the house on any touch were: Mike Rozier, Barry Sanders, and Adrian Peterson. Them and Barkley were amazing to watch.
Also LJ.
The only 3 other players I can remember (I'm sure there's more) as being able to take it to the house on any touch were: Mike Rozier, Barry Sanders, and Adrian Peterson. Them and Barkley were amazing to watch.
Reggie Bush too.
Also LJ.
Right. The Barry Sanders belief. Every time he touches the ball you believe he can scoreWhen he gets the ball, I find myself leaning in thinking, "I'm about to see something I've never seen before."
Another PSU player screwed out of the Heisman.Kijana was always a homerun threat
Collins hurt him that year. Both had a good argument to win. KiJana and Collins were definitely worthyAnother PSU player screwed out of the Heisman.
KiJana too....The only 3 other players I can remember (I'm sure there's more) as being able to take it to the house on any touch were: Mike Rozier, Barry Sanders, and Adrian Peterson. Them and Barkley were amazing to watch.
Collins hurt him that year. Both had a good argument to win. KiJana and Collins were definitely worthy
No he didn't....KiJana could have got all of Collins votes and still not win. It was the hype train for Salaam that won it.Collins hurt him that year. Both had a good argument to win. KiJana and Collins were definitely worthy
No he didn't....KiJana could have got all of Collins votes and still not win. It was the hype train for Salaam that won it.
I'm not talking votes. It's hard, though not impossible, to win when there's two elite players on the same offense. KiJana should have won IMO but 2k still mattered back thenNo he didn't....KiJana could have got all of Collins votes and still not win. It was the hype train for Salaam that won it.
I also remember a discussion going into the bowl games in 94 about whether Penn State should jump Nebraska if they were impressive in their bowl game and Nebraska wasn't. That was met with a resounding no, a number one team that wins should never get jumped. Fast forward three years later when UM was #1 and Nebraska was #2....same question completely opposite answer by the same talking heads that said no three years earlier. That and the KiJana/LJ discussions solidified in my mind that there has always been an anti-PSU slant with all these clowns. Nothing since then has changed my mind.It was those bastions of objectivity people rave about -- Herbstreit, Corso, and Co -- that cost Ki-Jana the Heisman in 1994. All those idiots ever talked about was how "every RB who gained 2,000 yards has won the Heisman." No mention of number of carries or the numerous times Carter sat out the entire 4th quarters because the HC didn't want to "embarrass" the opponent with a rout.
Now that "2,000 yard" mantra was dropped in 2002 when a Penn State RB achieved it. You know, like the way "winning a conference championship means everything" changed when it was Penn State that won it.
It's hard (and yes, pretty much impossible) to win if you have PSU on your jersey. Just ask LJ.I'm not talking votes. It's hard, though not impossible, to win when there's two elite players on the same offense. KiJana should have won IMO but 2k still mattered back then
I don't buy the anti-Penn St bias but okayIt's hard (and yes, pretty much impossible) to win if you have PSU on your jersey. Just ask LJ.
Which other blue blood program only has one Heisman winner? Which other blue blood program has as many undefeated seasons without a NC? I'll save you the googling, the answer is zero. If you don't see an anti-PSU bias over the years, you're looking the other way.I don't buy the anti-Penn St bias but okay
Which other blue blood program only has one Heisman winner? Which other blue blood program has as many undefeated seasons without a NC? I'll save you the googling, the answer is zero. If you don't see an anti-PSU bias over the years, you're looking the other way.
So you can explain away the trees but not the whole forest. Why do all these explanations focus on explaining why PSU or one of its players got screwed? The other blue bloods don't need to explain away all the times they got short changed....that's the point.Those early undefeated seasons were because of many reasons including political as you know. The 94 season was about Tommy Osbourne finally getting a title. I think Penn St > Nebraska but sadly they never played * playoff anyone* It was the system. Joe wasn't hated then. KiJana and LJ are the only two arguments for the Heisman. KiJana losing makes sense even if I disagree with it. Saquon is amazing but doesn't have the numbers. Everyone isn't out to get us...aside from our own BOT at one point
KiJana spent a lot of time on the sidelines once Paterno took his foot off the gas. He could have easily surpassed the 2k number if he had been allowed to stay in and amass meaningless yards (i.e. the Wisconsin approach w/ Ron Dayne).KiJana should have won IMO but 2k still mattered back then
KiJana spent a lot of time on the sidelines once Paterno took his foot off the gas. He could have easily surpassed the 2k number if he had been allowed to stay in and amass meaningless yards (i.e. the Wisconsin approach w/ Ron Dayne).