He's a bad man:
O'Neil was also nominated for LI's Player of The Year, as a sophomore.
More insane highlights:
O'Neil was also nominated for LI's Player of The Year, as a sophomore.
More insane highlights:
Who are you, Andy Bernard?So, the question is, with basically no real future, beyond college, in the sport comprised of failed baseball players, why would anyone who was good enough to go wherever they wanted chose PSU when you could go to Johns Hopkins, Yale, Penn, Cornell, etc. and still play top level competition? Get the best education you can out of these sports that don't have legitimate professional futures (in the short-term), kids.
Was a PSU commit in 8th grade.
So, the question is, with basically no real future, beyond college, in the sport comprised of failed baseball players, why would anyone who was good enough to go wherever they wanted chose PSU when you could go to Johns Hopkins, Yale, Penn, Cornell, etc. and still play top level competition? Get the best education you can out of these sports that don't have legitimate professional futures (in the short-term), kids.
He's a bad man:
O'Neil was also nominated for LI's Player of The Year, as a sophomore.
More insane highlights:
"Sport of failed baseball players" could not be further from the truth and the single worst description of a lacrosse player I have ever heard. That is like calling a football player a failed golf player. Entirely different sports that appeal to total opposite sportsman requiring different skills and athleticism.
There is no real correlation between lacrosse and baseball that I'm aware of. My nephew is an up and coming lacrosse player and he maybe played one hear of t ball and then football and lacrosse, and not just lacrosse.So, the question is, with basically no real future, beyond college, in the sport comprised of failed baseball players, why would anyone who was good enough to go wherever they wanted chose PSU when you could go to Johns Hopkins, Yale, Penn, Cornell, etc. and still play top level competition? Get the best education you can out of these sports that don't have legitimate professional futures (in the short-term), kids.
You are a useless tool!!! Where I grew up, you played lacrosse and if you weren't any good at that you tried baseball or golf or bowling or slow pitch, games more akin to your capabilities, tool!!I know that description rankles lax bros, but it’s historically accurate. Kids try baseball, and if they are successful (can hit and throw), they stay with it. If they struggle, they try lax and see if it’s more a fit for them because it’s less about acquired skill and more focused on running around.
Nowadays there’s also the element of attention span, so some decent hand-eye coordination kids are giving lax a try because it’s constant motion and over quickly, but, generally, those kids do both sports until they have to decide at an advanced age.
yup that's true, I've seen it before, baseball an after thought.You are a useless tool!!! Where I grew up, you played lacrosse and if you weren't any good at that you tried baseball or golf or bowling or slow pitch, games more akin to your capabilities, tool!!
I know that description rankles lax bros, but it’s historically accurate. Kids try baseball, and if they are successful (can hit and throw), they stay with it. If they struggle, they try lax and see if it’s more a fit for them because it’s less about acquired skill and more focused on running around.
Nowadays there’s also the element of attention span, so some decent hand-eye coordination kids are giving lax a try because it’s constant motion and over quickly, but, generally, those kids do both sports until they have to decide at an advanced age.
You are a useless tool!!! Where I grew up, you played lacrosse and if you weren't any good at that you tried baseball or golf or bowling or slow pitch, games more akin to your capabilities, tool!!
Before attacking the kid’s choice, we might also want to consider that it came down to: which Program and staff he liked, which school environment he liked, intended major, etc. Shocking stuff, I know.So, the question is, with basically no real future, beyond college, in the sport comprised of failed baseball players, why would anyone who was good enough to go wherever they wanted chose PSU when you could go to Johns Hopkins, Yale, Penn, Cornell, etc. and still play top level competition? Get the best education you can out of these sports that don't have legitimate professional futures (in the short-term), kids.
This sounds just like the Basketball/Hockey phenomenon. Kids try basketball then if they can't shoot or make a layup just decide to strap on skates. Because that's how "acquired skills" work.
uh the Green Hornets would disagree with much of what you are saying. It looks in fact, they hired one the finest lacrosse players to ever play, to be in charge of their youth program. (Mole man, Michael Burnett)No, that’s not how “basketball/hockey” works. Both those sports are more "acquired skill" endeavors, with hockey obviously much more time/labor intensive.
There was just recently some news segment (ESPN maybe? I just had it on in the background as I was doing other things) about lacrosse - some adult decided to start a high school lacrosse program, and he had to start it with kids that never played the game before. Within a year that team was competitive at the high school level. You would never see that with hockey, or even basketball - advanced age kids who had never skated or dribbled a basketball.
Hockey and basketball, by contrast, are sports where the decision to play one or the other is made early on. We do see a couple of kids transition out of hockey and into basketball, but almost never the other way around. Hockey is a year-round sport by age 8 where I live (MA).
Lacrosse is more akin to football, where kids often don't start playing the sport in an organized fashion until their freshman year, because most positions in football don't require those "acquired skills" in order to succeed. You get yourself a generally athletic kid who likes/doesn't mind contact, and you can quickly turn him into a successful football player at most positions.
No, that’s not how “basketball/hockey” works. Both those sports are more "acquired skill" endeavors, with hockey obviously much more time/labor intensive.
There was just recently some news segment (ESPN maybe? I just had it on in the background as I was doing other things) about lacrosse - some adult decided to start a high school lacrosse program, and he had to start it with kids that never played the game before. Within a year that team was competitive at the high school level. You would never see that with hockey, or even basketball - advanced age kids who had never skated or dribbled a basketball suddenly becoming good at the sport almost overnight (unless you're a 7 footer in basketball).
Hockey and basketball, by contrast, are sports where the decision to play one or the other is made early on. We do see a couple of kids transition out of hockey and into basketball, but almost never the other way around. Hockey is a year-round sport by age 8 where I live (MA).
Lacrosse is more akin to football, where kids often don't start playing the sport in an organized fashion until their freshman year, because most positions in football don't require those "acquired skills" in order to succeed. You get yourself a generally athletic kid who likes/doesn't mind contact, and you can quickly turn him into a successful football player at most positions.
Lacrosse is pretty popular around here, but even the guy who runs our youth organization and played college lacrosse, will tell you that, when it comes to spring sports, if you have a dual-sport same-season athlete (lacrosse and baseball both being spring sports, first and foremost, here) and you are facing a time crunch in any particular year, you would give up lacrosse for that year, because you aren't going to fall behind in lacrosse the same way you would baseball. His sons do both, right now. I actually wish my kids would take it up, as they were able to throw, catch and cradle very quickly, and they're coordinated/fairly athletic so they would do well and enjoy it. But they just want to play baseball in the spring.
That maybe true where you live but in NY, MD & parts of SE PA, kids are more or less born with sticks in their hands. The "Easter Bunny" brought my daughter here first stick when she was 4. It was her first piece of sports equipment.
uh the Green Hornets would disagree with much of what you are saying. It looks in fact, they hired one the finest lacrosse players to ever play, to be in charge of their youth program. (Mole man, Michael Burnett)
ABOUT: The Green Hornets Boy’s Lacrosse Program began in 1969 and has continued to serve the proud lacrosse tradition Severna Park holds. The Green Hornets are committed to developing our community’s lacrosse players by giving them the opportunity to develop and achieve their goals as an athlete on and off the field. The Green Hornets staff is able to assist lacrosse players that are aspiring to compete at the highest level, as well as lacrosse players who want to learn more about the sport and have fun.
Green Hornets offers:
(See highlighted links below)
- Fall Camp/Clinic: Open to all Players. NEW Program! Register now.
- Select Teams: Require a tryout and play in the new Fall League, Spring League, and June Tournaments NEW Program! Register now!
- Spring League: Traditional “in season” rec & select lacrosse. Register now!
Director of coach and player development:
Mike Burnett
- National Lacrosse Hall of Fame
- UNC Chapel Hill Lacrosse Coach
- National Champion lacrosse player at UNC Chapel Hill (1981-82)
- Named one of the Top 50 players in Atlantic Coast Conference lacrosse history in August 2002
I don't follow - is lacrosse more akin to football with kids not playing until high school or is your anecdotal example of the youth organized coach and your kids playing (whether it's casual or not) exceptions to the rule?
Lacrosse is more akin to football, where kids often don't start playing the sport in an organized fashion until their freshman year,Uh, OK. Not sure what that informational disclosure was meant to prove, but it's duly noted.
Lacrosse is more akin to football, where kids often don't start playing the sport in an organized fashion until their freshman year,
those kids dont look like (and are not) freshmen. They start playing organized LAX well before the freshman year.
No, that’s not how “basketball/hockey” works. Both those sports are more "acquired skill" endeavors, with hockey obviously much more time/labor intensive.
There was just recently some news segment (ESPN maybe? I just had it on in the background as I was doing other things) about lacrosse - some adult decided to start a high school lacrosse program, and he had to start it with kids that never played the game before. Within a year that team was competitive at the high school level. You would never see that with hockey, or even basketball - advanced age kids who had never skated or dribbled a basketball suddenly becoming good at the sport almost overnight (unless you're a 7 footer in basketball).
Hockey and basketball, by contrast, are sports where the decision to play one or the other is made early on. We do see a couple of kids transition out of hockey and into basketball, but almost never the other way around. Hockey is a year-round sport by age 8 where I live (MA).
Lacrosse is more akin to football, where kids often don't start playing the sport in an organized fashion until their freshman year, because most positions in football don't require those "acquired skills" in order to succeed. You get yourself a generally athletic kid who likes/doesn't mind contact, and you can quickly turn him into a successful football player at most positions.
Lacrosse is pretty popular around here, but even the guy who runs our youth organization and played college lacrosse, will tell you that, when it comes to spring sports, if you have a dual-sport same-season athlete (lacrosse and baseball both being spring sports, first and foremost, here) and you are facing a time crunch in any particular year, you would give up lacrosse for that year, because you aren't going to fall behind in lacrosse the same way you would baseball. His sons do both, right now. I actually wish my kids would take it up, as they were able to throw, catch and cradle very quickly, and they're coordinated/fairly athletic so they would do well and enjoy it. But they just want to play baseball in the spring.
Before attacking the kid’s choice, we might also want to consider that it came down to: which Program and staff he liked, which school environment he liked, intended major, etc. Shocking stuff, I know.
Simply complicated you just have no evidence to support your theory here with the exception of one example of a town God knows where that had leftover baseball players transitioning to lacrosse. I played division 1 lacrosse and I can tell you, empirically, that not 1 of my teammates ever played baseball or had even the slightest desire to. Hockey? Sure....Football? Sure, like sports. No lacrosse player has ever said "boy, I wish I was better at that slow sport my granddaddy played so I didn't have to get caught up in this lacrosse stuff." In "lacrosse" regions, as has been stated above( northeast, Colorado, and growing) kids literally never consider baseball. In my town, lacrosse was the preeminent sport in the town and many towns across this country. In my town, if you could not cut the 2 deep at lacrosse, you played baseball.
Non-binding verbal made in 8th grade. You do realize he can change his mind at any point in the process until he signs his NLI, and probably even after.Before attacking the kid’s choice, we might also want to consider that it came down to: which Program and staff he liked, which school environment he liked, intended major, etc. Shocking stuff, I know.
The 8th grader's choice?
That maybe true where you live but in NY, MD & parts of SE PA, kids are more or less born with sticks in their hands. The "Easter Bunny" brought my daughter here first stick when she was 4. It was her first piece of sports equipment.
No evidence? It's pretty much a nationwide phenomenon. Has been. Every town in this area, where I know parents who have or have had kids growing up in athletics, has experienced the same thing. MA, PA, NY, NJ, CT.
If you live in a pocket of exception, okey dokey.
No evidence? It's pretty much a nationwide phenomenon. Has been. Every town in this area, where I know parents who have or have had kids growing up in athletics, has experienced the same thing. MA, PA, NY, NJ, CT.
If you live in a pocket of exception, okey dokey.
Before attacking the kid’s choice, we might also want to consider that it came down to: which Program and staff he liked, which school environment he liked, intended major, etc. Shocking stuff, I know.
Non-binding verbal made in 8th grade. You do realize he can change his mind at any point in the process until he signs his NLI, and probably even after.
Since lacrosse is so easy to pick up, I suggest your kids do so which will guarantee them D1 scholarships (I can explain lacrosse scholarships to you, if you’d like).
Going broader here, I’m not sure why kids who are really good at baseball still play in college given how few get to the majors. This latest point is meant as sarcasm.
Sorry, did you say where you live? Here in SE PA these kids are starting to play lax in third grade or earlier. People in this area would laugh at the "failed baseball analogy". The sport is picking up the best athletes at an early age in this area.
Non-binding verbal made in 8th grade. You do realize he can change his mind at any point in the process until he signs his NLI, and probably even after.
Since lacrosse is so easy to pick up, I suggest your kids do so which will guarantee them D1 scholarships (I can explain lacrosse scholarships to you, if you’d like).
Going broader here, I’m not sure why kids who are really good at baseball still play in college given how few get to the majors. This latest point is meant as sarcasm.
Nice work with the ad hominem attack.Non-binding verbal made in 8th grade. You do realize he can change his mind at any point in the process until he signs his NLI, and probably even after.
Since lacrosse is so easy to pick up, I suggest your kids do so which will guarantee them D1 scholarships (I can explain lacrosse scholarships to you, if you’d like).
Going broader here, I’m not sure why kids who are really good at baseball still play in college given how few get to the majors. This latest point is meant as sarcasm.
Easy, lax bro.
I referenced being decent at the sport, picking it up late, not getting a D1 slot. No need to get worked up over basic truths.
And your last paragraph is off the rails. It’s awful sarcasm. Kids who are REALLY good at baseball often don’t even play in college. Regardless, who said anything about kids not playing in college? That’s silly. I mentioned parlaying a sport with no future (yes, I know about MLL) beyond college, no matter how good you are, into the best possible education. It’s not like football, where a stud can attend OSU and then make tens of millions of dollars, whereas if he decided to attend Yale, his likelihood of developing and getting that money would drop tremendously. Many of the top academic colleges play top level lacrosse, so you’re missing out on very little by choosing Penn over Penn State, for example. But you’re gaining a better degree.
Hahaha! Truth. Like Spaulding SmailsWith name like that you gotta be a lax bro