They're miserable a--holes on their own site. This is their normal interaction with the human race. And they wonder why hate runs so deep.
Yet there are several PSU fans over there having some pretty good discussions since Flo's rankings came out.
They're miserable a--holes on their own site. This is their normal interaction with the human race. And they wonder why hate runs so deep.
I'm happy for them as they can hopefully enjoy the debate before the season starts. I don't think once the Dual Championship Series is over or the National Championships are over or when Spencer Lee makes his final decision... or Mark Hall makes his final decision... they're going to want to be anywhere near HR. But they're big boys... and choose where they spend their idle time.Yet there are several PSU fans over there having some pretty good discussions since Flo's rankings came out.
I'm happy for them as they can hopefully enjoy the debate before the season starts. I don't think once the season gets underway or Spencer Lee makes his final decision... or Mark Hall makes his final decision... they're going to want to be anywhere near HR. But they're big boys... and choose where they spend their idle time.
The rankings also Chief can be very subjective. Like the football rankings, it take weeks into the season to prove who might have been over rated (ranked) or who might be an emerging talent no one saw as being one.
The slightest bad Iowa news...and... I don't have to finish... you know what happens.
And here I thought they were written in stone.
Welp, there will always be D-Bags on any site that attack outside posters for no other reasons than they do not like the other side.
Well... you made two assumptions and you know again what occurs when you do that? I don't have to finish that one either. No one attacked the poster directly... a statement was merely made and he took it personally. It's a preference. You don't have to like it or not like it.
And how could the rankings be in stone?
Did you feel like I was directing that post at you Amalone? Ass-u-me. But feel free to lace those Cael's up and wear them. And yes, I was having a funny at your need to 'splain the rankings. May I make a suggestion? You should write down all the Penn State dominance/Iowa sucks paragraphs on a word document for quick reference to copy and paste. Will save you some time on each of your posts. Here's a witty comeback for you to start the collection: "Hey Chief, God may be a Hawk fan but when his only Son comes back to wash the world of sin, he's signing with Cael." You see? Not that hard. Feel free to use it down the line.
Rankings are based on past performance.Well... you made two assumptions and you know again what occurs when you do that? I don't have to finish that one either. No one attacked the poster directly... a statement was merely made and he took it personally. It's a preference. You don't have to like it or not like it.
And how could the rankings be in stone? They're based on future performance. I hope you were being facetious. And there always will be disappointed Iowa fans. It's a law of nature. Dan Gable set the bar too high and there wasn't as much parity in college wrestling as their is today's collegiate wrestling landscape.
Parity if you call Penn State's four National titles in five years... parity.
Rankings are based on past performance.
Predictions are for future performance.
That's a whole lotta typing but completely false.Rankings... such as preseason rankings are based on future performance also. PPS's explanation, though original in it's intent.... doesn't make sense when you look at a Bo Nickal having no official past performance at the collegiate level. You can't base a wrestler who's a first time starter on past performance at the collegiate level. The greater part of a 1st year projected starter is where you see them placing at that moment in time when you do the rankings. It's completely subjective and NOT based on past performance. There's NONE to go on. What about wrestlers like Alex Meyer who are 1st time starters?? We're basing their ranking on how well they wrestled the previous starter in the room and how that starting wrestler was ranked the previous season to end the season, how much sweat came off them in a practice session, how well he talks himself up in interviews or how close to Iowa City or how much CP likes him when the ranker is a die hard Iowa fan? Alex Meyer... 5th and Bo Nickel 16th? Let them wrestle today and Alex Meyer might be 16th and Bo Nickal in the top five. That would lend themselves to the subjective nature of pre-season rankings.
Their ranking is subjectively done on who that person (ranker) sees that wrestler fitting in talent wise against his competition. That's merely subjective and NOT based on any quantifiable information at all, none past... but surely future possible success to the level they are ranked. That's why rankings are so fun to debate, pre-season. They are mainly subjective because many wrestlers have NO past performance to go on.
That's ridiculous. Both had a body of work last year. Bo was 15-2 losing at the Scuffle in a match he was injured in, and a close loss to Matt Brown at the NLO. Injury prevented him from getting a notable win at the Scuffle. Chief just stated Meyers case. You can argue a couple spots here or there, but their rankings are where you would expect them based upon previous year results. I do however expect Bo to go up in the rankings as the season goes on. 174 is wide open. My early money is on Epperly, so imo we will know where Bo is at pretty soon.
Stache's backup ranked higher than Stache's last finish. Hmmm ...
Chief... I'll defer to El Jefe's comments in the 174 Ranking thread... "
That's ridiculous. Both had a body of work last year. Bo was 15-2 losing at the Scuffle in a match he was injured in, and a close loss to Matt Brown at the NLO. Injury prevented him from getting a notable win at the Scuffle. Chief just stated Meyers case. You can argue a couple spots here or there, their rankings are where you would expect them based upon previous year results. I do however expect Bo to go up in the rankings as the season goes on. 174 is wide open. My early money is on Epperly, so imo we will know where Bo is at pretty soon.
Is that slang for you can't make your own argument so you have to bring others into it? If El Jefe's point is that Meyer is overrated, that's his opinion. I would argue the same points in my prior post. Also, 174 cleared out big time.He is not ranked higher than two guys that he beat because he was a backup and didn't wrestle in the tourney. I'm good with that.
But that's not the argument...You were stating that rankings for both guys are future based. JRod stated Bo's case based on his redshirt year. I made Alex's because both have wrestled actual college matches.
No... I brought El Jefe's statement in because I knew you would comment that way and I agree with El Jefe's assertion, he was making in his rhetorical question.. but of course... it needed elaboration.
I know that Alex Meyer is over rated. The season will prove that out as a starter as he faces a depleted 174 weight class.
I think that Bo Nickal handles him easily when they face each other in the semi's of the Dual Championship Series if Iowa makes it that far. If Cornell, Oklahoma State or Ohio State doesn't knock Iowa off first.
Obtuse. Deliberate or not I'm unsure but definitely obtuse.JROD... That makes no sense. If Alex Meyer went 15-3 as a non-starter at 174 and Bo Nickal went 15-2 as a non starter at 174 and Bo lost a very close match at the Nittany Open to the eventual NATIONAL CHAMPION, Matt Brown, 10-7 (took Matt Brown at the buzzer FYI)... Why is he ranked 16th in the country... based on past performance of last year?
And in Penn State's Official Bio on Bo Nickal... they make absolutely no mention of his RS Freshman year, nor Zain Retherford's RS year, nor Nico Megaludis's RS year.
http://www.gopsusports.com/sports/m-wrestl/mtt/bo_nickal_921773.html
http://www.gopsusports.com/sports/m-wrestl/mtt/zain_retherford_847201.html
http://www.gopsusports.com/sports/m-wrestl/mtt/nico_megaludis_771153.html
Where as in the Iowa Official Bio of Alex Meyer... they mention his wins, losses in his RS year. He was 11-8 his RS FR year, by the way, as compared to Bo's 15-2 his RS FR year which Penn State doesn't acknowledge as he wrestled unattached.
Makes sense on your past performance comment? I can see how this all adds up with no subjective evaluation at all.
Did Zain or Nico wrestle at all last year? BTW, Matt Brown's redshirt record from Iowa State is included in his PSU bio. Maybe they just haven't gotten to it yet for Bo.
Definitely NOT obtuse. Your argument is shot out of the water based on past RS year performance... directly put in front of your face. How do you rank the Iowa wrestler 5th in the country and the other guy with a better winning percentage as a younger wrestler, with far less experience, but wrestled the National Champion as hard as any competitor... as a true freshman... ranked #16. Was #17 before a wrestler was changed. Had a year to wrestle to get better in a phenomenal wrestling room, battling it out with two National Champions that are around his weight, day after day in David Taylor and Matt Brown. One a technician and one a hammer. You have NO idea how to answer that... or you would have Capt. Oblivous... Master Obuse.Obtuse. Deliberate or not I'm unsure but definitely obtuse.
That's ridiculous. Both had a body of work last year. Bo was 15-2 losing at the Scuffle in a match he was injured in, and a close loss to Matt Brown at the NLO. Injury prevented him from getting a notable win at the Scuffle. Chief just stated Meyers case. You can argue a couple spots here or there, but their rankings are where you would expect them based upon previous year results. I do however expect Bo to go up in the rankings as the season goes on. 174 is wide open. My early money is on Epperly, so imo we will know where Bo is at pretty soon.
Here's all I'm going to say about this whirligig of rhetoric:
Well there you have it. I will take your word for it that rankings are predictions despite the author of said rankings saying otherwise. You are also correct in that rankers should consider who wrestlers train with and not unofficial matches they may have wrestled (as verified on their bio on PSU's website) when factoring rankings. Nickal is "predicted" to finish 16th (outside round of 12) at a thinned out weight. Makes sense. You win.Definitely NOT obtuse. Your argument is shot out of the water based on past RS year performance... directly put in front of your face. How do you rank the Iowa wrestler 5th in the country and the other guy with a better winning percentage as a younger wrestler, with far less experience, but wrestled the National Champion as hard as any competitor... as a true freshman... ranked #16. Was #17 before a wrestler was changed. Had a year to wrestle to get better in a phenomenal wrestling room, battling it out with two National Champions that are around his weight, day after day in David Taylor and Matt Brown. One a technician and one a hammer. You have NO idea how to answer that... or you would have Capt. Oblivous... Master Obuse.
Your guys a junior and couldn't break the line up with a previous NON Top 5, final ranked guy. Matt Brown... beat down the guy, Alex Meyer couldn't beat to get in the line up. As a freshman.... Bo Nickal almost beat that Iowa beater. Yet the Iowa guy is #5 and the Penn State RS freshman is #16. How accurate is that ranking? Not very.
For what it is worth 36,000 tickets sold so far. Looks like a high of 56 on Saturday. I think with a walk up crowd it will be over 40k fans in attendance.
11:00am central time on Saturday. I believe it is on live on BTN2Go. On BTN the following day on Sunday at 7:00pm.What time is the match and what network?
11:00am central time on Saturday. I believe it is on live on BTN2Go. On BTN the following day on Sunday at 7:00pm.