Some of you can't watch another football game without twisting it into

[JoeDidntKnow]

Yea, just like you don't think the b1g shiz-hole intentionally threw the call in 2005 both on the field and then too not even review it in violation of the b1g shiz-hole Replay Review Procedure in place at the time - a call that cost PSU an undefeated season in 2005 and a place in the National Championship Bowl that year. Weird how that works, huh b1g shiz-hole lover?

Jethro... AWESOME. He's smarter than most of these inbred B1G fans

 

[richmin3]

some vendetta against players, coaches, etc. that you don't like. No matter who the teams are, they will talk about the head coaches a lot... they will also talk about the best players a lot. Get over it. If you don't watch Penn State games on TV, they do the same for CJF and for our best players. They also fawned all over Joe. They have to talk about something between plays. The announcers do not benefit from promoting certain players, coaches or teams. They are just trying to keep the game interesting for most fans.

Also, Jim Delaney and the Big Ten as a whole (including officiating crews) aren't out to get Penn State. Neither is ESPN, Dave Jones, or the rest of the media. People are human, but generally try to do their best. They also work towards their best interest and intentionally sabotaging Penn State is not in their best interest. A universal bias or grad conspiracy is not plausible.

For those of you that take exception, I hope you are more objective and less paranoid in your interests outside of Penn State football.

Are you sure about that! You could a fooled me!! The only reason we have instant replay in college football came about from Paterno complaining and Rightfully So about the constant and (obvious) hosing Penn State received from the Big Ten Officials in particular the Michigan /Ohio State games. In addition Jim Delany is a complete horses ass for piling on with fines and withholding bowl money after the illegal sanctions from the NCAA were handed down. I say illegal because through discovery and lawsuits they were repealed by the NCAA which would not have happened if they were legal. For the head of the Big Ten to come out and Not support one of it"s leading members (Stinks To High Heaven), so go ahead and call us paranoid, but what Jim Delany did was extremely harmful and detrimental to the Penn State sports program. Sabotage seems extremely plausible to me!! You claim a universal bias or grand conspiracy is not plausible, but I ask you, how is it that other members are treated differently than PSU? ie: The Ohio State University. After their legal issues with tattoo gate, head coach lying (Tressle) his firing and players allowed to play in bowl game at the behest of Mr Delany. I see a BIG PROBLEM here. My suggestion for you is get off that soapbox of yours and preach to a different choir. I, for one am not buying that pile of horse shit your selling.

 

[Grant Green]

some vendetta against players, coaches, etc. that you don't like. No matter who the teams are, they will talk about the head coaches a lot... they will also talk about the best players a lot. Get over it. If you don't watch Penn State games on TV, they do the same for CJF and for our best players. They also fawned all over Joe. They have to talk about something between plays. The announcers do not benefit from promoting certain players, coaches or teams. They are just trying to keep the game interesting for most fans.

Also, Jim Delaney and the Big Ten as a whole (including officiating crews) aren't out to get Penn State. Neither is ESPN, Dave Jones, or the rest of the media. People are human, but generally try to do their best. They also work towards their best interest and intentionally sabotaging Penn State is not in their best interest. A universal bias or grad conspiracy is not plausible.

For those of you that take exception, I hope you are more objective and less paranoid in your interests outside of Penn State football.

Actually, I think all those posters are just the 30 different personalities of bushwood.

 

[richmin3]

H

Actually, I think all those posters are just the 30 different personalities of bushwood.

Actually, I think all those posters are just the 30 different personalities of bushwood.

It's quite telling when so many come on this and yet so few on your end.

 

[Grant Green]

H


It's quite telling when so many come on this and yet so few on your end.

I have no idea what that means.

 

[Ranger Dan]

21 people have liked my original post... it's not scientific, but I'm not all alone out here on the limb.