ADVERTISEMENT

SportsIllustrated goes deep: "Four years later, reflections on covering the Jerry Sandusky trial"

ChiTownLion

Well-Known Member
May 29, 2001
37,750
50,521
1
Four years later, reflections on covering the Jerry Sandusky trial
penn-state-sex-scandal-jerry-sandusky-1.jpg

BY COLLEEN CURRY
Fri Nov. 13, 2015

On Nov. 5, 2011, Jerry Sandusky was arrested on child sex abuse charges, and as the case unfolded in the subsequent months, Penn State University nearly imploded. I covered the events as a reporter for ABC News from start to finish.


1. Questions of Faith
Behind the courthouse, in the glaring June sun, a dozen photographers and reporters watch silently as Jerry Sandusky, the man accused of molesting at least 10 children over a 15-year period, laughs and helps shuffle boxes of documents from a cart into the waiting SUV. It is the third day of testimony in his trial — damning, graphic, horrific testimony that seems sure to return a guilty verdict.

Clad in a dark suit that contrasts his shock of white hair, Sandusky stands more than six feet tall and 250 pounds — a football player’s body with a grandfather’s soft demeanor. As he lifts the boxes of files, Sandusky smiles at the waiting reporters and looks around helplessly for direction from his attorney. He seems almost unaware of what has been happening inside the building behind him each day. It’s hard to imagine him directing a football play, a children’s charity, or even his own vehicle. In fact, he is driven everywhere by his attorney. He is hapless, a silly old man. Or at least that is the idea being presented to us here behind the courthouse.

Of course, there is a disconnect there. The crimes he is accused of committing, and which have been detailed inside the courtroom each day, would have to have been carefully concealed from the world if they were to be committed. The prosecutors call him calculating, an “expert” pedophile, arrogant, bold, and most of all, a monster. Does that description fit? Is he a big, stupid oaf, or a cold, evil predator? That is the question that Joe Amendola, Sandusky’s lanky defense attorney, is trying to pose to the jury. But that question, it turns out, will be shockingly easy to answer.

No, our central question, and what amounted to our central preoccupation in Centre County, Pennsylvania, in June 2012, would come to be the icon, the demigod, Joe Paterno, and what he knew and when he knew it.


2. The Problem of Evil

When Sandusky was charged, the Pennsylvania Attorney General released the indictment quietly on a Friday afternoon, purportedly by accident. Sandusky and two other top Penn State officials were arrested on Saturday, and by the time I got into the office Monday morning, the national media were just slowly catching onto what had happened in State College over the weekend.

“Curry,” my editor said. “Why don’t you keep an eye on those Penn State officials?”

I had no idea what she meant. I nodded and scribbled a note on my pad: Penn State?

I printed out and read the indictment at my desk, the words blurring in front of me as I began to understand what I was reading. It described how in 2001, an assistant coach at Penn State claimed he had seen the retired defensive coordinator naked with a child in the locker room showers. The young assistant told the university’s head football coach — Paterno — who in turn told his boss, the Athletic Director, who told the Vice President, who then told the President. Five men, in all, were made aware that Sandusky had done somethinginappropriate with a boy in the university’s locker rooms, yet none of them picked up a phone to call police, according to the indictment. This was a central point of the case, a point that would in time eat away at the the university’s community.

More immediately powerful to me in those first moments, though, was the detailed recounting of Sandusky’s sexual relationships with eight boys. The indictment was filled with graphic descriptions of intimately horrific behavior between a man I’d never heard of and boys whose names would not be made public. I sat queasy at my computer, flipping through the pages. I was the first in our newsroom to read what soon the rest of the world would have to hear about over and over for 10 months, and I had no idea how to interpret it or begin to make sense of it. What follow-up questions do you ask about a man who violently and sexually attacked 9-year-olds? It was so far outside of my reach, my normal everyday existence. It was, I would later think, an eerie, solitary encounter with evil.

3. Teachers to Suit Their Own Passions
The drive to Penn State is daunting. The highway curves and climbs over the foothills of the Allegheny Mountains and then descends sharply into the bowl-shaped land known as Happy Valley, though its geographical name is familiar too: Nittany Valley, home to the Nittany Lions. The road into town drops visitors right at the doorstep of Penn State University, sitting on the valley floor, the faint echo of student voices chanting, “We Are! Penn State!” bouncing off the mountain walls.


You know you are there when you see the stadium. It rises up, gothic and vaguely ominous, like an ancient cathedral in the middle of the city. There, inside the stadium’s walls, a small tough man with rolled up pants and thick black glasses led the football team each Saturday for 61 years. It was a lifetime and then some for the head of a football program, and enough time for Joe Paterno’s reputation and persona to grow so large that its enormity seemed to compete with Beaver Stadium itself. That is, if you could separate the two. Beaver Stadium was synonymous with Joe Paterno, and Paterno, after six decades in power, was synonymous with Penn State University.

penn-state-sex-scandal-jerry-sandusky-2.jpeg

Photo: AP
“Joe Pa,” as he was affectionately dubbed, had taken Penn State from a no-name athletic program to a Division-I Big Ten powerhouse during his tenure. The school became nationally known for football, and Paterno’s rising tide lifted the boats of the university’s academics, athletics, community, and, in fact, the entire state. Enrollment increased, as did Penn State’s profits. Paterno, in effect, was at least partially responsible for thousands of students attending the school, for hundreds of faculty members being hired, and thousands more staff becoming employed as the campus grew. His incredible success was so important to the reputation, fundraising and academics of the institution, that football had become arguably the most powerful “department” on campus. At the head of that department, and at the top of the university’s power structure, sat Paterno.

Paterno, for his part, didn’t act like a powerful sports hotshot. He owned a modest ranch home only a block away from school, in a small middle-class neighborhood with nice front lawns. He walked to home games across the fields of the campus he loved so much, and donated back millions to help improve the academics of the university. Though he was, in some sense, the architect of his surroundings, he appeared, day-to-day, as merely a humble occupant, too.

It was this disparity that earned Paterno the adoration of his community. Despite his power, the head coach represented the community’s values: honor, success, education, humility. Though he grasped the school’s economic reins, he also remained its moral compass. Or so it seemed, anyway.

Continue: http://www.si.com/thecauldron/2015/11/12/covering-psu-sex-scandal-jerry-sandusky-joe-paterno
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: step.eng69
Yet another clueless and LAZY hack trying to pay the utility bill with words.

Coleen, you should actually stop and read some of the INFORMATION posted by the small fanatics. They actually contain facts and nuggets of truth. Journalists care about those things, you obviously do not.

Ask a lousy question use what little intellect God gave you.
Well, after your post I'm not going to bother reading this. More of the same and it will serve only to piss me off.
 
I found this article to be largely a piece of crap. Ill informed and poorly written. Looks like something michnittlion would have written. Like I said. A piece of crap.
It's too bad that none of these so-called journalists would never in a million years have the fortitude to debate stuff like this with someone who actually knows what he/she is talking about before a public forum. Journalists and reporters can throw whatever the heck they want out there and are accountable to no one. It's a disgrace.
 
You wonder who edits these articles, or fact checks these articles, or what caused the author to write the following:

"On Wednesday night, the cameras flashed and students watched helplessly as a telegram was delivered to Paterno’s house by messenger. The message inside was clear: You’re fired."

Or how about this:

"On our best days, we reporters try to live up to our duties as surrogates for the public: seeing things up close, asking difficult questions, getting to the truth, informing the community. And in State College, we came to see and feel, I think, the community’s confusion, disbelief and eventual anger toward Paterno, a man who did so much good, a man who the community so blindly believed in, a man who uplifted them and was at times their North Star, and who, it seemed, apparently allowed this to happen."

I'm pretty sure I've spent a lot more time in State College over the past 4 years than the reporter, and I can't say that I ever sensed anger toward JoePa.

Here's another gem:

"Even now, nearly four years after his death, much of the interest in the story that still populates blogs and Twitter, and occasionally provides fodder for news reports, focuses on Paterno and what he knew. A passionate core of Paterno fans beats ceaselessly (and fruitlessly) to clear their guy’s name, to poke holes in investigations that have long since ended."

Another one that caught my eye:

"Later, when the NCAA was considering imposing the so-called “death penalty” on Penn State football, the whole region seemed to seize up in fear. The fiscal loss would be devastating and could feasibly result in the loss of thousands of jobs over the following decade, as revenue and status at the university inevitably dropped."

The "whole region" never had any sense in July 2012 that the NCAA was considering imposing the death penalty.

I'm not sure what to make of this:

"The people of Centre County feared losing the little affluence and stability they had through Penn State, while those beyond Centre County worried whether they would be able to keep putting food on the table for their children. Though banishing football might have been a just punishment for the crimes of the athletic department, it would not have been just for the people of Penn State, they said. They had already been subjected to national media scrutiny and to the humiliation of having a child sex scandal erupt at their place of employment or education. The very real possibility of total economic devastation would be too much to bear.


The residents of Centre County that I met were furious that Sandusky’s crimes — and anyone who abetted them — threatened their way of existence."

I never met anyone in town/the region that felt that banishing football would be a just punishment for "the crimes of the athletic department." In fact, I don't think I've ever met anyone in town that thought the athletic department had committed any crimes.

I'm not sure when the author became a moralizer and a judge and jury, but she wrote this in the article:

"In America, we have the court system, our measly and sometimes-effective way of bringing some small amount of legal justice to wrongs committed. But, of course, it is not enough. No legal punishment can account for the emotional pain wrought by Jerry Sandusky, and certainly there is no action that can right the nebulous, questionable actions of Joe Paterno, university president Graham Spanier, and other Penn State officials. The feeling in our guts of seeing so many humans failing to treat other humans well cannot be remedied by a million repetitions of the word ‘guilty,’ but it is all we have."

I won't dignify that paragraph with a response.
 
You wonder who edits these articles, or fact checks these articles, or what caused the author to write the following:

"On Wednesday night, the cameras flashed and students watched helplessly as a telegram was delivered to Paterno’s house by messenger. The message inside was clear: You’re fired."

Or how about this:

"On our best days, we reporters try to live up to our duties as surrogates for the public: seeing things up close, asking difficult questions, getting to the truth, informing the community. And in State College, we came to see and feel, I think, the community’s confusion, disbelief and eventual anger toward Paterno, a man who did so much good, a man who the community so blindly believed in, a man who uplifted them and was at times their North Star, and who, it seemed, apparently allowed this to happen."

I'm pretty sure I've spent a lot more time in State College over the past 4 years than the reporter, and I can't say that I ever sensed anger toward JoePa.

Here's another gem:

"Even now, nearly four years after his death, much of the interest in the story that still populates blogs and Twitter, and occasionally provides fodder for news reports, focuses on Paterno and what he knew. A passionate core of Paterno fans beats ceaselessly (and fruitlessly) to clear their guy’s name, to poke holes in investigations that have long since ended."

Another one that caught my eye:

"Later, when the NCAA was considering imposing the so-called “death penalty” on Penn State football, the whole region seemed to seize up in fear. The fiscal loss would be devastating and could feasibly result in the loss of thousands of jobs over the following decade, as revenue and status at the university inevitably dropped."

The "whole region" never had any sense in July 2012 that the NCAA was considering imposing the death penalty.

I'm not sure what to make of this:

"The people of Centre County feared losing the little affluence and stability they had through Penn State, while those beyond Centre County worried whether they would be able to keep putting food on the table for their children. Though banishing football might have been a just punishment for the crimes of the athletic department, it would not have been just for the people of Penn State, they said. They had already been subjected to national media scrutiny and to the humiliation of having a child sex scandal erupt at their place of employment or education. The very real possibility of total economic devastation would be too much to bear.


The residents of Centre County that I met were furious that Sandusky’s crimes — and anyone who abetted them — threatened their way of existence."

I never met anyone in town/the region that felt that banishing football would be a just punishment for "the crimes of the athletic department." In fact, I don't think I've ever met anyone in town that thought the athletic department had committed any crimes.

I'm not sure when the author became a moralizer and a judge and jury, but she wrote this in the article:

"In America, we have the court system, our measly and sometimes-effective way of bringing some small amount of legal justice to wrongs committed. But, of course, it is not enough. No legal punishment can account for the emotional pain wrought by Jerry Sandusky, and certainly there is no action that can right the nebulous, questionable actions of Joe Paterno, university president Graham Spanier, and other Penn State officials. The feeling in our guts of seeing so many humans failing to treat other humans well cannot be remedied by a million repetitions of the word ‘guilty,’ but it is all we have."

I won't dignify that paragraph with a response.
It's too bad that none of these so-called journalists would never in a million years have the fortitude to debate stuff like this with someone who actually knows what he/she is talking about before a public forum. Journalists and reporters can throw whatever the heck they want out there and are accountable to no one. It's a disgrace.




Meanwhile, today's headline in USAToday: "Blue Skies Return At North Carolina" referring to putting the academic scandal behind them and just focusing on basketball now. Unreal.
 
You wonder who edits these articles, or fact checks these articles, or what caused the author to write the following:

"On Wednesday night, the cameras flashed and students watched helplessly as a telegram was delivered to Paterno’s house by messenger. The message inside was clear: You’re fired."

Or how about this:

"On our best days, we reporters try to live up to our duties as surrogates for the public: seeing things up close, asking difficult questions, getting to the truth, informing the community. And in State College, we came to see and feel, I think, the community’s confusion, disbelief and eventual anger toward Paterno, a man who did so much good, a man who the community so blindly believed in, a man who uplifted them and was at times their North Star, and who, it seemed, apparently allowed this to happen."

I'm pretty sure I've spent a lot more time in State College over the past 4 years than the reporter, and I can't say that I ever sensed anger toward JoePa.

Here's another gem:

"Even now, nearly four years after his death, much of the interest in the story that still populates blogs and Twitter, and occasionally provides fodder for news reports, focuses on Paterno and what he knew. A passionate core of Paterno fans beats ceaselessly (and fruitlessly) to clear their guy’s name, to poke holes in investigations that have long since ended."

Another one that caught my eye:

"Later, when the NCAA was considering imposing the so-called “death penalty” on Penn State football, the whole region seemed to seize up in fear. The fiscal loss would be devastating and could feasibly result in the loss of thousands of jobs over the following decade, as revenue and status at the university inevitably dropped."

The "whole region" never had any sense in July 2012 that the NCAA was considering imposing the death penalty.

I'm not sure what to make of this:

"The people of Centre County feared losing the little affluence and stability they had through Penn State, while those beyond Centre County worried whether they would be able to keep putting food on the table for their children. Though banishing football might have been a just punishment for the crimes of the athletic department, it would not have been just for the people of Penn State, they said. They had already been subjected to national media scrutiny and to the humiliation of having a child sex scandal erupt at their place of employment or education. The very real possibility of total economic devastation would be too much to bear.


The residents of Centre County that I met were furious that Sandusky’s crimes — and anyone who abetted them — threatened their way of existence."

I never met anyone in town/the region that felt that banishing football would be a just punishment for "the crimes of the athletic department." In fact, I don't think I've ever met anyone in town that thought the athletic department had committed any crimes.

I'm not sure when the author became a moralizer and a judge and jury, but she wrote this in the article:

"In America, we have the court system, our measly and sometimes-effective way of bringing some small amount of legal justice to wrongs committed. But, of course, it is not enough. No legal punishment can account for the emotional pain wrought by Jerry Sandusky, and certainly there is no action that can right the nebulous, questionable actions of Joe Paterno, university president Graham Spanier, and other Penn State officials. The feeling in our guts of seeing so many humans failing to treat other humans well cannot be remedied by a million repetitions of the word ‘guilty,’ but it is all we have."

I won't dignify that paragraph with a response.
I'll only say, don't tell me, tell her!!!
 
  • Like
Reactions: nits74
I found this article to be largely a piece of crap. Ill informed and poorly written. Looks like something michnittlion would have written. Like I said. A piece of crap.
And it serves to point out that while, in some instances the narrative has changed for the better, nationally it has remained pretty much the same. The damage done by our November, 2011 BOT was so monumental, it can never be totally repaired, only reduced to some degree. This is not to suggest we should give up the fight, but it does mean that any meaningful victory is years, or perhaps decades, away.
 
Well, after your post I'm not going to bother reading this. More of the same and it will serve only to piss me off.
Yep, I won't be reading it either. Geez this stuff will never go away...they make it a point to keep bringing it up and putting it in the headlines. First JS getting his pension back and now this....what will it be next week/month/year?!
 
  • Like
Reactions: fairgambit
Meanwhile, today's headline in USAToday: "Blue Skies Return At North Carolina" referring to putting the academic scandal behind them and just focusing on basketball now. Unreal.

Yeah, unc really suffered. Of course, they only focused on basketball then, so nothing's changed.
 
I read this and then scrolled back to the top to make sure it was written this year. It's like she wrote this 4 years ago copy and saved it then decided to print it today. Here I thought it would be a piece looking back while also compiling new facts that have emerged since then. Silly me
 
Ugh, I hate 99% of these types of pieces, whether it's about PSU or Charlie Pierce writing about some unrelated subject like Tiger Woods.

When you write this type of interpretation piece - one where you're telling a story of observation as if you're an infallible-to-omnipotent narrator - you better be a damn thoughtful and incisive observer.

It's the writing style of a wannabe demigod, which is what makes this irritatingly ironic.
 
  • Like
Reactions: The Spin Meister
The young assistant told the university’s head football coach — Paterno — who in turn told his boss, the Athletic Director, who told the Vice President, who then told the President. Five men, in all, were made aware that Sandusky had done somethinginappropriate with a boy in the university’s locker rooms, yet none of them picked up a phone to call police, according to the indictment. This was a central point of the case, a point that would in time eat away at the the university’s community.

Gotta love how the author doesn't even question why the indictment didn't mention Curley telling JR at TSM about the incident in 2001. The author is probably oblivious to this FACT.

Or how about the fact that the one and only witness in 2001 testified that no one at PSU ever told him to keep quiet about it.

Numerous people outside of PSU knew about 2001 including JR (JS's employer who had DIRECT control over JS's access to kids),JM and Dr. D, yet it was still a PSU cover up?? Come on people use your brains!!
 
Gotta love how the author doesn't even question why the indictment didn't mention Curley telling JR at TSM about the incident in 2001. The author is probably oblivious to this FACT.

Or how about the fact that the one and only witness in 2001 testified that no one at PSU ever told him to keep quiet about it.

Numerous people outside of PSU knew about 2001 including JR (JS's employer who had DIRECT control over JS's access to kids),JM and Dr. D, yet it was still a PSU cover up?? Come on people use your brains!!

Its like she never heard of Bruce Heim.
 
Gotta love how the author doesn't even question why the indictment didn't mention Curley telling JR at TSM about the incident in 2001. The author is probably oblivious to this FACT.

Or how about the fact that the one and only witness in 2001 testified that no one at PSU ever told him to keep quiet about it.

Numerous people outside of PSU knew about 2001 including JR (JS's employer who had DIRECT control over JS's access to kids),JM and Dr. D, yet it was still a PSU cover up?? Come on people use your brains!!


She writes about how the "indictment was released on a quiet Friday afternoon and reading the "indictment" at work on Monday. She read the damned presentment so the entire piece goes into the crapper from that point forward. Lazy piece of crap.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WeR0206
Key line from the article...dead smack in teh middle:

That winter, the story lost interest with readers. Because Joe Pa was dead.

This guy is trying to justify his crucifixion of Joe...complete with a comment that a later investigation (Freeh) stated that Joe knew. Noplace is there any hesitation that Joe was a bystander, that he followed the law (including the NCAA's current guidelines on what should be done in such a situation), and/or that Freeh has been found to be lacking in many different ways.
 
Last edited:
Sports Illustrated is a dying magazine. There was a time growing up in the 80's where you couldn't wait to get the SI from the mailbox and read up on sports. That is how you followed a lot of things. now with the internet, nobody needs SI as they get everything on line. So SI has just converted to the way most papers are now with opinion pieces for shock value.
 
This is why the Paterno suit will go to a full conclusion.

Interesting that they didn't quit once the wins were restored. Some geniuses said that's what the Paternos were really after. Then the geniuses said it's about the money, despite the fact that the Paternos have always been charitable and that Sue said money awarded will go to charity. Gee, I wonder what their motivation really is. o_O
 
Four years later, reflections on covering the Jerry Sandusky trial
penn-state-sex-scandal-jerry-sandusky-1.jpg

BY COLLEEN CURRY
Fri Nov. 13, 2015

On Nov. 5, 2011, Jerry Sandusky was arrested on child sex abuse charges, and as the case unfolded in the subsequent months, Penn State University nearly imploded. I covered the events as a reporter for ABC News from start to finish.


1. Questions of Faith
Behind the courthouse, in the glaring June sun, a dozen photographers and reporters watch silently as Jerry Sandusky, the man accused of molesting at least 10 children over a 15-year period, laughs and helps shuffle boxes of documents from a cart into the waiting SUV. It is the third day of testimony in his trial — damning, graphic, horrific testimony that seems sure to return a guilty verdict.

Clad in a dark suit that contrasts his shock of white hair, Sandusky stands more than six feet tall and 250 pounds — a football player’s body with a grandfather’s soft demeanor. As he lifts the boxes of files, Sandusky smiles at the waiting reporters and looks around helplessly for direction from his attorney. He seems almost unaware of what has been happening inside the building behind him each day. It’s hard to imagine him directing a football play, a children’s charity, or even his own vehicle. In fact, he is driven everywhere by his attorney. He is hapless, a silly old man. Or at least that is the idea being presented to us here behind the courthouse.

Of course, there is a disconnect there. The crimes he is accused of committing, and which have been detailed inside the courtroom each day, would have to have been carefully concealed from the world if they were to be committed. The prosecutors call him calculating, an “expert” pedophile, arrogant, bold, and most of all, a monster. Does that description fit? Is he a big, stupid oaf, or a cold, evil predator? That is the question that Joe Amendola, Sandusky’s lanky defense attorney, is trying to pose to the jury. But that question, it turns out, will be shockingly easy to answer.

No, our central question, and what amounted to our central preoccupation in Centre County, Pennsylvania, in June 2012, would come to be the icon, the demigod, Joe Paterno, and what he knew and when he knew it.


2. The Problem of Evil

When Sandusky was charged, the Pennsylvania Attorney General released the indictment quietly on a Friday afternoon, purportedly by accident. Sandusky and two other top Penn State officials were arrested on Saturday, and by the time I got into the office Monday morning, the national media were just slowly catching onto what had happened in State College over the weekend.

“Curry,” my editor said. “Why don’t you keep an eye on those Penn State officials?”

I had no idea what she meant. I nodded and scribbled a note on my pad: Penn State?

I printed out and read the indictment at my desk, the words blurring in front of me as I began to understand what I was reading. It described how in 2001, an assistant coach at Penn State claimed he had seen the retired defensive coordinator naked with a child in the locker room showers. The young assistant told the university’s head football coach — Paterno — who in turn told his boss, the Athletic Director, who told the Vice President, who then told the President. Five men, in all, were made aware that Sandusky had done somethinginappropriate with a boy in the university’s locker rooms, yet none of them picked up a phone to call police, according to the indictment. This was a central point of the case, a point that would in time eat away at the the university’s community.

More immediately powerful to me in those first moments, though, was the detailed recounting of Sandusky’s sexual relationships with eight boys. The indictment was filled with graphic descriptions of intimately horrific behavior between a man I’d never heard of and boys whose names would not be made public. I sat queasy at my computer, flipping through the pages. I was the first in our newsroom to read what soon the rest of the world would have to hear about over and over for 10 months, and I had no idea how to interpret it or begin to make sense of it. What follow-up questions do you ask about a man who violently and sexually attacked 9-year-olds? It was so far outside of my reach, my normal everyday existence. It was, I would later think, an eerie, solitary encounter with evil.

3. Teachers to Suit Their Own Passions
The drive to Penn State is daunting. The highway curves and climbs over the foothills of the Allegheny Mountains and then descends sharply into the bowl-shaped land known as Happy Valley, though its geographical name is familiar too: Nittany Valley, home to the Nittany Lions. The road into town drops visitors right at the doorstep of Penn State University, sitting on the valley floor, the faint echo of student voices chanting, “We Are! Penn State!” bouncing off the mountain walls.


You know you are there when you see the stadium. It rises up, gothic and vaguely ominous, like an ancient cathedral in the middle of the city. There, inside the stadium’s walls, a small tough man with rolled up pants and thick black glasses led the football team each Saturday for 61 years. It was a lifetime and then some for the head of a football program, and enough time for Joe Paterno’s reputation and persona to grow so large that its enormity seemed to compete with Beaver Stadium itself. That is, if you could separate the two. Beaver Stadium was synonymous with Joe Paterno, and Paterno, after six decades in power, was synonymous with Penn State University.

penn-state-sex-scandal-jerry-sandusky-2.jpeg

Photo: AP
“Joe Pa,” as he was affectionately dubbed, had taken Penn State from a no-name athletic program to a Division-I Big Ten powerhouse during his tenure. The school became nationally known for football, and Paterno’s rising tide lifted the boats of the university’s academics, athletics, community, and, in fact, the entire state. Enrollment increased, as did Penn State’s profits. Paterno, in effect, was at least partially responsible for thousands of students attending the school, for hundreds of faculty members being hired, and thousands more staff becoming employed as the campus grew. His incredible success was so important to the reputation, fundraising and academics of the institution, that football had become arguably the most powerful “department” on campus. At the head of that department, and at the top of the university’s power structure, sat Paterno.

Paterno, for his part, didn’t act like a powerful sports hotshot. He owned a modest ranch home only a block away from school, in a small middle-class neighborhood with nice front lawns. He walked to home games across the fields of the campus he loved so much, and donated back millions to help improve the academics of the university. Though he was, in some sense, the architect of his surroundings, he appeared, day-to-day, as merely a humble occupant, too.

It was this disparity that earned Paterno the adoration of his community. Despite his power, the head coach represented the community’s values: honor, success, education, humility. Though he grasped the school’s economic reins, he also remained its moral compass. Or so it seemed, anyway.

Continue: http://www.si.com/thecauldron/2015/11/12/covering-psu-sex-scandal-jerry-sandusky-joe-paterno
Congrats to the douche for being able to get paid for such sophomoric crap.
She violates every principle of sound journalism, from "don't make yourself the story" to "stick to the facts".
Plus the writing is over the top purple prose: "(Beaver Stadium) rises up, gothic and vaguely ominous, like an ancient cathedral in the middle of the city...At the head of that department (football), and at the top of the university’s power structure, sat Paterno." Oy vey!
 
Congrats to the douche for being able to get paid for such sophomoric crap.
She violates every principle of sound journalism, from "don't make yourself the story" to "stick to the facts".
Plus the writing is over the top purple prose: "(Beaver Stadium) rises up, gothic and vaguely ominous, like an ancient cathedral in the middle of the city...At the head of that department (football), and at the top of the university’s power structure, sat Paterno." Oy vey!
And Beaver Stadium is not in the middle of the "city" either. If anything, it's off the beaten track.
 
And Beaver Stadium is not in the middle of the "city" either. If anything, it's off the beaten track.

That truth doesn't support the author's suggestion that we're all the little Whos in Whoville who come out and join hands in a circle around the stadium and worship football to the exclusion of human decency. Get with the script.
 
You wonder who edits these articles, or fact checks these articles, or what caused the author to write the following:

"On Wednesday night, the cameras flashed and students watched helplessly as a telegram was delivered to Paterno’s house by messenger. The message inside was clear: You’re fired."

Or how about this:

"On our best days, we reporters try to live up to our duties as surrogates for the public: seeing things up close, asking difficult questions, getting to the truth, informing the community. And in State College, we came to see and feel, I think, the community’s confusion, disbelief and eventual anger toward Paterno, a man who did so much good, a man who the community so blindly believed in, a man who uplifted them and was at times their North Star, and who, it seemed, apparently allowed this to happen."

I'm pretty sure I've spent a lot more time in State College over the past 4 years than the reporter, and I can't say that I ever sensed anger toward JoePa.

Here's another gem:

"Even now, nearly four years after his death, much of the interest in the story that still populates blogs and Twitter, and occasionally provides fodder for news reports, focuses on Paterno and what he knew. A passionate core of Paterno fans beats ceaselessly (and fruitlessly) to clear their guy’s name, to poke holes in investigations that have long since ended."

Another one that caught my eye:

"Later, when the NCAA was considering imposing the so-called “death penalty” on Penn State football, the whole region seemed to seize up in fear. The fiscal loss would be devastating and could feasibly result in the loss of thousands of jobs over the following decade, as revenue and status at the university inevitably dropped."

The "whole region" never had any sense in July 2012 that the NCAA was considering imposing the death penalty.

I'm not sure what to make of this:

"The people of Centre County feared losing the little affluence and stability they had through Penn State, while those beyond Centre County worried whether they would be able to keep putting food on the table for their children. Though banishing football might have been a just punishment for the crimes of the athletic department, it would not have been just for the people of Penn State, they said. They had already been subjected to national media scrutiny and to the humiliation of having a child sex scandal erupt at their place of employment or education. The very real possibility of total economic devastation would be too much to bear.


The residents of Centre County that I met were furious that Sandusky’s crimes — and anyone who abetted them — threatened their way of existence."

I never met anyone in town/the region that felt that banishing football would be a just punishment for "the crimes of the athletic department." In fact, I don't think I've ever met anyone in town that thought the athletic department had committed any crimes.

I'm not sure when the author became a moralizer and a judge and jury, but she wrote this in the article:

"In America, we have the court system, our measly and sometimes-effective way of bringing some small amount of legal justice to wrongs committed. But, of course, it is not enough. No legal punishment can account for the emotional pain wrought by Jerry Sandusky, and certainly there is no action that can right the nebulous, questionable actions of Joe Paterno, university president Graham Spanier, and other Penn State officials. The feeling in our guts of seeing so many humans failing to treat other humans well cannot be remedied by a million repetitions of the word ‘guilty,’ but it is all we have."

I won't dignify that paragraph with a response.

Relative to
"In America, we have the court system, our measly and sometimes-effective way of bringing some small amount of legal justice to wrongs committed. But, of course, it is not enough. No legal punishment can account for the emotional pain wrought by Jerry Sandusky, and certainly there is no action that can right the nebulous, questionable actions of Joe Paterno, university president Graham Spanier, and other Penn State officials. The feeling in our guts of seeing so many humans failing to treat other humans well cannot be remedied by a million repetitions of the word ‘guilty,’ but it is all we have."

I won't dignify that paragraph with a response.

, it's called punishing the innocent within the Penn State Family and rewarding the guilty outside the Penn State Family who exaggerated Penn State's involvement in their exaggerated interaction with Jerry Sandusky.
 
Sports Illustrated has been a joke for quite a while. They'll print anything at this point.
 
Better title " 4 years later and I just regurgitated the line I was handed four years ago and published. "

No one with a measurable IQ believes there is such a thing as a sports journalist at this point in time. There is just too much continuous evidence being put in print day after day after day after day.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WeR0206
I don't understand why the posters are upset?

This story is pretty factual to how people outside PSU see PSU.

If you don't like it push for the trial for C/S/S to happen. They probably won't happen in my life, because with any trial there is a possibility of jail time for C/S/S even if they are innocent. They will keep delaying and the prsecution is in no hurry either.

I have an idea! If you really want to get rid of these type of articles, then push for a new trial for Jerry. Jerry is already guilty, so he won't face more time. A new trial will get the facts straight and will uncover more of the truth.

Who know? Maybe an objective jury will see there is zero evidence that Jerry had sex with anybody. Maybe a better trained attorney can punch holes in the victim's previous testimony. It has been revealed since the trial that many timelines do not hold up.

Maybe they can get Alan Myers to testify? Maybe we can get some of the BOT to testify? Maybe 2nd Mile? How about the professionals at DPW, who are trained to spot a pedophile?

Maybe an innocent man won't rot in jail?
 
I don't understand why the posters are upset?

This story is pretty factual to how people outside PSU see PSU.

If you don't like it push for the trial for C/S/S to happen. They probably won't happen in my life, because with any trial there is a possibility of jail time for C/S/S even if they are innocent. They will keep delaying and the prsecution is in no hurry either.

I have an idea! If you really want to get rid of these type of articles, then push for a new trial for Jerry. Jerry is already guilty, so he won't face more time. A new trial will get the facts straight and will uncover more of the truth.

Who know? Maybe an objective jury will see there is zero evidence that Jerry had sex with anybody. Maybe a better trained attorney can punch holes in the victim's previous testimony. It has been revealed since the trial that many timelines do not hold up.

Maybe they can get Alan Myers to testify? Maybe we can get some of the BOT to testify? Maybe 2nd Mile? How about the professionals at DPW, who are trained to spot a pedophile?

Maybe an innocent man won't rot in jail?
Please go away, Todd.
 
I don't understand why the posters are upset?

This story is pretty factual to how people outside PSU see PSU.

If you don't like it push for the trial for C/S/S to happen. They probably won't happen in my life, because with any trial there is a possibility of jail time for C/S/S even if they are innocent. They will keep delaying and the prsecution is in no hurry either.

I have an idea! If you really want to get rid of these type of articles, then push for a new trial for Jerry. Jerry is already guilty, so he won't face more time. A new trial will get the facts straight and will uncover more of the truth.

Who know? Maybe an objective jury will see there is zero evidence that Jerry had sex with anybody. Maybe a better trained attorney can punch holes in the victim's previous testimony. It has been revealed since the trial that many timelines do not hold up.

Maybe they can get Alan Myers to testify? Maybe we can get some of the BOT to testify? Maybe 2nd Mile? How about the professionals at DPW, who are trained to spot a pedophile?

Maybe an innocent man won't rot in jail?

I'm always amused when someone assumes we don't live out in the real world and know how bad the bot royally screwed up psu's image and reputation.
 
My point Joe is that you know it, but don't do anything about it. Do you think this author would pen this, if he knew that tens of thousands of alumni were pushing for a new trial for Jerry? Do you think other writers may wonder why and then revisit the evidence to see there is no evidence? Only victims who were paid millions that alleged they were raped.
 
My point Joe is that you know it, but don't do anything about it. Do you think this author would pen this, if he knew that tens of thousands of alumni were pushing for a new trial for Jerry? Do you think other writers may wonder why and then revisit the evidence to see there is no evidence? Only victims who were paid millions that alleged they were raped.
If the author were aware that tens of thousands of alumni were pushing for a new trial for Jerry there would be more of the same, or worse. A new trial would bring more negativity from the media. Do you think that they would be jumping on the "free Jerry" bus? You might want to rethink that.
 
When are these a-hole reporters going to realize you can't go near this story without living it the past 4 years. This reporter like all of them did not!
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT