Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes, it is Jim, and anyone that acts similarly has my respect and admiration.It's mindboggling how people will put their entire lives at risk. I'm not even going to ask how they can take such destructive advantage of people and still live with themselves.
I'm really just an ordinary Joe Blow off the street, but one thing I can say is that I've done very little harm in my life. For whatever reason, I think this is something to be proud of.
Nice house. Gonna look nice on every Megan's Law pushpin map in the country, assuming he pleads, as the story indicated. Hard to believe anything printed until it actually happens. Dude must have had some serious caysh.
He can always go back to his previous line of work - renting out bootleg copies of porn movies to college freshmen at a buck a pop. He seems to have a natural talent for that sort of thing.assuming there's a divorce, fines, lawyers fees, civil suits (if any), and the lack of an income, I think it's safe to say he will no longer be able to afford that house.
what the hell are you talking about? as an iu alumnus you can both bite my ass.No mention of anything on the Indiana Rivals or Scout boards... but there is a thread that says they should have beat us in 2013.
what the hell are you talking about? as an iu alumnus you can both bite my ass.
Ummmmmm. Ok then chief.what the hell are you talking about? as an iu alumnus you can both bite my ass.
what the hell are you talking about? as an iu alumnus you can both bite my ass.
Indiana University of Pennsylvania........No mention of anything on the Indiana Rivals or Scout boards... but there is a thread that says they should have beat us in 2013.
Hey now. I'm an IUP (M' 90) grad and damn proud of it.Indiana University of Pennsylvania........
I told you when they went to his house and were removing computers and such, they weren't checking on his former associate.
Yes, it is Jim, and anyone that acts similarly has my respect and admiration.
Here's a freak they obviously found porn on the computer, yet there was a lack of any on JS computer?
Hmmmmmmmmmmmm...that hogwash excuse pedos don't keep porn on computers just went down the commode with the rest of JJ's turds.
What about the argument some use that child pornography on a computer does not prove an individual is acting on it? Not real familiar with the Subway guy's situation, but is there any proof he has acted out? In any event the subject still nauseates me, so I read or know very little about these type of individuals.I'm certain many pedos do, but I'm also certain many do not. So while child porn on a computer is pretty conclusive of a pedophile, the lack thereof is not conclusive that someone is not.
I'm a raging heterosexual, but you'll find no trace of porn on my computer. Does that disprove that I am? (More likely means I'm just more computer savvy than Hillary Clinton's people).
Hey now. I'm an IUP (M' 90) grad and damn proud of it.
What about the argument some use that child pornography on a computer does not prove an individual is acting on it? Not real familiar with the Subway guy's situation, but is there any proof he has acted out? In any event the subject still nauseates me, so I read or know very little about these type of individuals.
"Raging heterosexual." Like that characterization.
What did Indiana university know and when?
Hard to believe that LE wouldn't want to make a highly visible arrest prior to accepting a plea bargain.
Heck. Hard to believe they'd accept a plea bargain at all without a full, very public, account being given. (Especially given the very public "raid.")
I don't see how we mitigate CSA by giving bargains to alleged perps.
Something odd going on here.
I was just scrolling down to offer up the same quote. Nicely done.It would be totally inappropriate to mention that he'll get plenty of foot longs in prison so I won't do it.
Hey now. I'm an IUP (M' 90) grad and damn proud of it.
nits74, the law takes action against collectors of child pornography because it is not a victimless crime. Every click/hit/viewing/etc essentially results in a partial funding of continued child sexual abuse and human trafficking. I can see why some might question the merits of punishing the so-called uninvolved observer, but present-day law recognizes these people as sponsors of crimes against humanity. I'm not sure if this is the appropriate response for someone who types the subject line into a google search for purposes of research and unwittingly winds up with a hard drive contaminated by images of child abuse... but, this seems to be a subject that requires a little more awareness. For example, think of the med school student at Michigan who had 100+ images of children engaged in horrific sex acts with adults... how would you feel if you found out your kids' pediatrician was none other than Stephen Jenson?
Here's the difference. Viewing adult porn on your computer is not a crime. However, with child porn, the mere act of viewing or possession is a crime. It matters not whether you act on it.What about the argument some use that child pornography on a computer does not prove an individual is acting on it? Not real familiar with the Subway guy's situation, but is there any proof he has acted out? In any event the subject still nauseates me, so I read or know very little about these type of individuals.
"Raging heterosexual." Like that characterization.
Maybe his plea will allow him to avoid hard core jail timeIt would be totally inappropriate to mention that he'll get plenty of foot longs in prison so I won't do it.