A
anon_d29z1jdixxwey
Guest
I'm a longtime lurker, first-time poster.
I've been holding in this question for some time because it may come across as dumb, ridiculous, stupid, or all of the above.
I've watched the Trials matches a few times, and I haven't been that disappointed in Bo since he politely allowed Kotlin Moore a respectable decision loss in the NCAA Finals.
I simply felt like with an Olympics berth on the line, we'd see something from Bo. Anything from Bo. The obvious answer is that DT simply negated anything Bo could even think to offer because he's at another level. Fair enough.
But without accusing of anyone of anything, is there a stupid unwritten rule in wrestling that it's DT's time, and Bo should stand down (either as teammates, or just in general)? Bo took some unfair flack for how he left the mat, but I sort of viewed it as disappointment that he really couldn't or didn't put it all out there.
OK, beat me up now...
I've been holding in this question for some time because it may come across as dumb, ridiculous, stupid, or all of the above.
I've watched the Trials matches a few times, and I haven't been that disappointed in Bo since he politely allowed Kotlin Moore a respectable decision loss in the NCAA Finals.
I simply felt like with an Olympics berth on the line, we'd see something from Bo. Anything from Bo. The obvious answer is that DT simply negated anything Bo could even think to offer because he's at another level. Fair enough.
But without accusing of anyone of anything, is there a stupid unwritten rule in wrestling that it's DT's time, and Bo should stand down (either as teammates, or just in general)? Bo took some unfair flack for how he left the mat, but I sort of viewed it as disappointment that he really couldn't or didn't put it all out there.
OK, beat me up now...
Last edited by a moderator: