Obey your overlords!
The article is about how Bret Stevens drew the ire of the left by suggesting an honest conversation about climate change. Seems like the d-baggers took exception to a conversation.
http://thefederalist.com/2017/05/01...ing-column-shows-left-isnt-interested-debate/
They don’t. The overwhelming reaction, as usual, was “Burn the witch!” If you challenge climate change alarmism, you’re a denier of science. If you believe Obamacare is flawed policy, you support killing poor Americans. If you support tax cuts, you’re a pawn of the plutocracy. There is a perfunctory reaction for every issue; a prefabricated smear devised just for the occasion. Every one is meant to circumvent debate while imbuing the Left’s position with a (fake) patina of morality and “science.”
The article is about how Bret Stevens drew the ire of the left by suggesting an honest conversation about climate change. Seems like the d-baggers took exception to a conversation.
http://thefederalist.com/2017/05/01...ing-column-shows-left-isnt-interested-debate/
They don’t. The overwhelming reaction, as usual, was “Burn the witch!” If you challenge climate change alarmism, you’re a denier of science. If you believe Obamacare is flawed policy, you support killing poor Americans. If you support tax cuts, you’re a pawn of the plutocracy. There is a perfunctory reaction for every issue; a prefabricated smear devised just for the occasion. Every one is meant to circumvent debate while imbuing the Left’s position with a (fake) patina of morality and “science.”
