Franklin fell on his sword for Hack. They weren't a good fit. But, CJF couldn't pull Hack - even if TM gave us a better chance to win (debatable at best, though he likely takes way fewer sacks) - the optics would have been terrible...
BINGO!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Franklin fell on his sword for Hack. They weren't a good fit. But, CJF couldn't pull Hack - even if TM gave us a better chance to win (debatable at best, though he likely takes way fewer sacks) - the optics would have been terrible...
Any post with Kim is worth a like. Or ten.
73: There is your starting right tackle this year.Yes and no. AR was a great college WR but Hack was a true Frosh at the time. you can count on one hand the number of college QB's successful in the true freshman year. But PSU had zero depth at WR behind AR. So going into 2014, we started Hamilton (RS Fresh), Geno Lewis (no longer with the team despite having eligibility) and Chris Godwin (true Fr). These guys have been criticised for NOT helping their QB by running poor routes and not coming back to the ball.
Regardless, AR wasn't going to be blocking anyone in pass coverage:
he didn't start the spring game, and you say they never change the starters from the spring game, so why do you keep saying he's the starting RT?? Heck he didn't start with the #1's the whole second half of spring practice!73: There is your starting right tackle this year.
But no, this staff doesn't favor upper classmen at all.
Oh, please. In spite of a year with OB and subsequent summer camps, Hackenberg continues to struggle with mechanics and accuracy. Do you really think this staff tried to screw up his footwork?? Give or take a tweak here and there, proper mechanics come more-or-less naturally to the good ones. Fortunately, it's no longer PSU's problem.Is it possible that Hack has a long way to go because the college coaches around him didn't develop him and in fact assisted him in regressing after hack's time with BOB?
That's what quite a few NFL scouts stated. Now we are reading the confirmations.
he didn't start the spring game, and you say they never change the starters from the spring game, so why do you keep saying he's the starting RT?? Heck he didn't start with the #1's the whole second half of spring practice!
Penciled in as starter in every single pre season magazine: Lindy's, Athlon, Sporting News, and Greg Pickel of the Patriot News.
Starting. And was never declared anything BUT the starter, they simply wanted to "take a look" at Beh.
Believe me I wish I was wrong here.
"Believe me I wish I was wrong here.". Sweet Baby Jesus, you get more moronic by the moment to such an extent that you violate Einstein's "Special Theory of Relativity"!
Believe me I wish I was wrong here.
You always are so chances are good you will be again.
Actually, I am nearly always right. I predicted 4 out of the 5 starters, while the rest of you haters had zero guts to make a prediction, cowarded out when I asked you to, and refused to make a stand regarding the failures of Franklin's personnel decisions.
I credit only Sluggo, for having the guts to also know that the kids we were running out there, didn't have it.
Nobody questioned whether the kids that played were good or not, everyone knew they were not ready to go. What was in question was what to do about it. You posted like the bench was loaded with guys that were ready to go and were better. Most everyone disagreed with you. Franklin either didn't feel they were ready or he was building for the future. Regardless of his motives, if given the choice between relying on Franklin's opinion or yours, I would pick Franklin 100 times out of 100. When you start coaching at the D-1 level, then you can prove your expertise, until then you're just Monday morning quarterbacking.
No point made. Ad hominem attack.
I win.
Is it possible that Hack has a long way to go because the college coaches around him didn't develop him and in fact assisted him in regressing after hack's time with BOB?
That's what quite a few NFL scouts stated. Now we are reading the confirmations.
People get enamored of kids who "can make every throw". If that was the mark of a great QB, Deiter Brock would be in the NFL Hall of Fame- he isn't.
Bates was a better offensive lineman than Mahon, Mangiro, Gaia, and Dowrey, all together, the day he arrived in State College: There was no excuse for redshirting him.
And there sure as hell won't be an excuse for redshirting Menet either. You play, to win the game.
Every damn body else does at this level: True freshmen started on offensive lines at 18 out of 25 top 25 teams last year. That philosophy is outdated. I've said this for the past 3 years, and it remains a fact.
Washington started 3 freshmen last year on their offensive line, they were a damn sight better than PSU's offensive line.
OK ... So Hack (along with EVERY other rookie QB) needs improvement on his footwork and his mechanics. And they are ALL a work in progress. But over the last 2 years, every time Hack displayed poor accuracy, poor fundamentals, poor pocket awareness, poor decision making ... It was Franklin's fault. For all of his problems, Hack and his Dad made sure that their lip service butt buddies like Trent Dilfer took the message to the airwaves to blame all the issues on Franklin. Why didn't we see Goff's coach, Wentz's coach, Lynch's coach .... getting thrown under the bus, if they all have the same mechanical and fundamentals problems??
People get enamored of kids who "can make every throw". If that was the mark of a great QB, Deiter Brock would be in the NFL Hall of Fame- he isn't.
73: There is your starting right tackle this year.
But no, this staff doesn't favor upper classmen at all.
Who did you want to start in 2014 and 2015 on the OL?
You are clueless. Nelson and Mahon started as RS freshman. Gaia and Dowrey started as RS sophomores which was their first year on the OL.
#73 started from day 1. How did that workout?
Give us YOUR starting OL in 2014 and 2015.