like your thought, but Robinson is not a FB. All 3 RB's have different running styles that I hope our coaches can maximize their skills on certain situations.
Not really. It was too hard maintaining the field with crowns on them!!!Just one of the many reasons the wishbone became extinct.......you put your 3 best RBs on the field. One gets injured you are putting in your 4th best RB and so on,,,,,,,, If one back is more talented, defenses can easily take him away.
I believe the triple option is FB, QB, and RB, right? I think what you want is the wishbone: http://brucey.net/nflab/howtoplay/formation.html
also must consider that there is an issue with recruiting......another reason it works for the academies, as MOST of those athletes are not dreaming of a pro football career.Yes you are correct I forgot about McSorley. the wishbone or I like to call it the "OQ" or "Option Quad" gotta give it a different name as the "wishbone" is so 70s-ish.
I
like your thought, but Robinson is not a FB. All 3 RB's have different running styles that I hope our coaches can maximize their skills on certain situations.
I loved watching Navy dominate Pitt with this offense. It is a fun offense to run and watch, but you have to have a QB that is good at it and it's tough to be a good option team and also throw the ball well, which is why it's not real popular.
Pitt is very familiar with the offense, and they still couldn't stop it. That is the really pathetic thing. It shows what a terrible gameday coach Narduzzi is.
mhbst3 said:How are we familiar with the triple option? Or moreover, how is Narduzzi completely familiar with the triple option? He had a game against Georgia Tech which he won but before that he had to refer to game film from Paul Chryst and when he was a defensive coordinator at Miami (OH).
Navy ran the ball against everyone they played and they had one of the best option quarterbacks running it for four straight years who ended up setting all time NCAA records.