Updated simulation has NW winning 24-21.
- Thread starter BisbeeMike
- Start date
LOL.
a) it's a video game.
b) With CPU randomness, if you ran Akron against PSU enough times, Akron would eventually win.
There are names on the jerseys. On the first defensive play after the opening kickoff, PSU plays a three man front. Why the f*** are we talking about this?
Because the guy who runs this whole thing is a Pitt fan.
We're doomed...stay home, don't get on the bus and just forfeit.
Then thank you for bringing it over here. Seek help Gunsie.
So PSU have scored 29+ points in 16 of 19 games since the beginning of 2016 (3 we haven’t being 10 @scUM in a loss and 24 vs OSU in a win and 21 vs IA in a win) and we’re only going to score 21 and lose vs NW?
If SB only gets 8 runs on Saturday, somebody needs fired.
On the other hand, Torrance Brown has a hell of a surgeon to be back on the field.
On the other hand, Torrance Brown has a hell of a surgeon to be back on the field.
How many catches did Chris Godwin have? Honestly don't know why Gunsie continues to bring crap like this here.
Last edited:
Uh oh, this tells it all. No sense in even watching it now.
Thanks for ruining my Saturday....
Thanks for ruining my Saturday....
Honesty don't know why you assume some sort of identity that I have no idea what you are talking about.
And for the record, I posted this because I thought it was insane.
Not only that but...
Guess how many times Penn State has given up 20 or more points this season?
Oh yeah...NONE. And yet, that's all gonna change against NW this Saturday, in the rain.
Yeah, sure.
This "simulation" is comical, AGAIN, that's why I posted it. They have us running a three man rush, and we're giving up 24 points to NW when we average 9.3 per GAME. This same clown had us losing to Pitt, 20-17, and when I called him on it, he claimed "but I also have PSU winning the national championship", as if that could be possible after a loss to Pitt.
Um, didn't that happen just last year, a team lost to Pitt yet won the national championship?
@Mack_Daddy
You might want to start studying this simulator on a weekly basis and incorporate any gold nuggets you glean from it into the algorithm you're currently using that's helped you to a top ten showing in the 2017 BWI Pick'Em contest. Might just be the edge you need to take home the top prize this year. Franco C. and I are both pulling for you.
You might want to start studying this simulator on a weekly basis and incorporate any gold nuggets you glean from it into the algorithm you're currently using that's helped you to a top ten showing in the 2017 BWI Pick'Em contest. Might just be the edge you need to take home the top prize this year. Franco C. and I are both pulling for you.
Last edited:
@mn78psu83
I would think you'd be pulling for me to win the Global Challenges Foundation competition. Minimum, I have a 1 in 2702 chance. Which, btw, I interpret as a 1/270 chance. I'm only concerned with the top 10 percentile.
Why not both? Pick'Em would be more impressive - in light of your historical prognostication record.
Because the former is a giant leap forward for humanity; the latter simply shows what everyone here already knows (that I'm smarter than them).
