It started at 11:00 a.m.
It started at 11:00 a.m.
What? You know everything before everyone what are their sentences that the judge told you last night they were going to hand down?
It appears Ceasar knows more than I - perhaps you should ask him/her.
These men had impeccable records before this offense, this is their first offense
Well that and the fact that they didn't do anything wrong.
You are welcomed to your opinion - but the facts say otherwise.
Fact: Two plead guilty - one was found guilty.
So legally - they did do something wrong.
And I guess you think OJ is innocent?
How many felonies were they found not guilty of? The one charge that Spanier was found guilty of, you do realize that the jury foreman said they made a mistake? What will you do when that parking ticket is overturned?
But by all means keep posting your ignorant garbage while ignoring the mistakes of the professional that truly failed those kids. #enabler
She is absolutely an enabler. And the selfish one at that. She'll be nowhere to be found when this garbage is overturned.
She thinks that "legally" they did something wrong. She must think legally OJ did nothing wrong.
Morally C/S/S did nothing wrong, that's just common sense. Spanier will soon be cleared "legally" too. C/S were stupid to plead, but given how tainted the jury pool was, I don't blame them.
She thinks that "legally" they did something wrong. She must think legally OJ did nothing wrong.
Morally C/S/S did nothing wrong, that's just common sense. Spanier will soon be cleared "legally" too. C/S were stupid to plead, but given how tainted the jury pool was, I don't blame them.
I am willing to concede they did something stupid. I am not willing to concede they willingly broke the law (especially the one they were found guilty of)
Roxine, the people in your family who knew (or should've known) about your abuse, did the law find them to be in error? If not, what are you doing to hold their feet to the fire?
A lovely photo choice by the Philly Voice.
You are so cluelessYou are welcomed to your opinion - but the facts say otherwise.
Fact: Two plead guilty - one was found guilty.
So legally - they did do something wrong.
Wow. I bet they wish they would have fought now.
Think I can answer. They cannot appeal as the sentence is within the standard range so there would be no basis to appeal it. They did not know what their sentence would be but would have known what the prosecution would argue at sentencing. Apparently they considered this outcome to be acceptable in terms of mitigating their risk as best as possible.Dumb questions: When Curley and Schultz took a plea, did they know what their sentence would be or only what it could be? Related to this, can they appeal today's sentence even though they took a plea?
Think I can answer. They cannot appeal as the sentence is within the standard range so there would be no basis to appeal it. They did not know what their sentence would be but would have known what the prosecution would argue at sentencing. Apparently they considered this outcome to be acceptable in terms of mitigating their risk as best as possible.
Their sentences should have been dictated by the prescribed penalties for:Wow. I bet they wish they would have fought now.
Think I can answer. They cannot appeal as the sentence is within the standard range so there would be no basis to appeal it. They did not know what their sentence would be but would have known what the prosecution would argue at sentencing. Apparently they considered this outcome to be acceptable in terms of mitigating their risk as best as possible.
Never thought I'd say this....
I am soooo happy I moved out of Pennsylvania. I think i am going to stop telling people I was born there. The fact that I went to college in WVa and live in CLE is much less embarrassing. The level of corruption in the state makes Chicago and Illinois look like utopia.
Good question BB and I too have wondered that. I would not be surprised if that foreman's comment shows up in the appeal. I meant I do not believe they can appeal the actual sentence. But certainly Spanier can appeal the verdict.Thanks for the info.
But if the jury foreman says to the media they made a mistake isn't that grounds for an appeal?
Not that I think anything will change, just curious.
Thanks for the info.
But if the jury foreman says to the media they made a mistake isn't that grounds for an appeal?
Not that I think anything will change, just curious.