ADVERTISEMENT

Who Has Been Quieter, Frank Sheeran,Lubrano,or CR666?

The Song Remains the Same

Well-Known Member
Sep 20, 2016
3,769
5,363
1
I've heard rumblings that CR's alleged stalking ways may have made him persona non grata, but Anthony and Frank appear to have gone dark as well... now coming up on 4 months since the (iirc) September 17 foreshadowed news update from AL and I've been wondering what New Year's resolutions Frank may have made.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sharkies
The Count is also missing, but he was counting Ohio State's points in their bowl game. So he didn't have to show up.

Ohio State victories over Penn State in 2016, Ohio State points scored in the game-deciding 4th quarter against Penn State, Ohio State football Championships (of any sort) won in 2016, Ohio State's points in their Bowl game. That is a whole lot of zeroes!

To break this streak, I'm going to next count Urban Meyer "heart-attacks" suffered in 2017!
 
Ohio State victories over Penn State in 2016, Ohio State points scored in the game-deciding 4th quarter against Penn State, Ohio State football Championships (of any sort) won in 2016, Ohio State's points in their Bowl game. That is a whole lot of zeroes!

To break this streak, I'm going to next count Urban Meyer "heart-attacks" suffered in 2017!

Troll.
 
Figures. He must have gotten banned as michnittidiot for finally drawing attention as a troll.
If Yahoo limited accounts to one per IP (even w/ those smart enough to use proxies), their numbers would be cut to 1/4 of what they probably tout them as.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Zenophile
For a man who promised a lot more communication "after September 17" he's been remarkably mute. Must be a helluva gag that Ira Lubert put into his mouth. Or maybe a bribe...or a threat. Who knows? Really disappointed in the lack of effort offered by the alumni elected BoT members.

None of the above.

Review of Freeh source materials continues.

Measure twice, cut once.

Lack of effort is a rather curious description. I have certainly exerted extensive effort to this point including a commitment of considerable personal resources.
 
He finally realized he was an unadulterated idiot and is now sulking in the Upper Peninsula.

yooper_pcard.jpg
 
None of the above.

Review of Freeh source materials continues.

Measure twice, cut once.

Lack of effort is a rather curious description. I have certainly exerted extensive effort to this point including a commitment of considerable personal resources.
Most certainly true

I suppose AL has done as much as anyone (probably considerably MORE than anyone) wrt "409/Freeh/Football"
For thousands of folks, I am sure those actions merit unending and unquestioned appreciation





Unfortunately, wrt Governance for PSU, a three legged squirrel - with one bad eye - would have done better, would have done more than the combined A9.

Actually, even a road kill squirrel would have at least:

NOT voted for Ira Lubert .......

And $160,000,000 for Ira Lubert to use to pay off Sandusky "claimants" and to cover his own ass (and the asses of his cohorts) ......

And another $500,000,000 of graft money for Lubert/Dambly Inc.........

etc
etc
etc

When all that was required, to at least accomplish the minimum level of Responsible Governance, was to say "NO"
 
Last edited:
None of the above.

Review of Freeh source materials continues.

Measure twice, cut once.

Lack of effort is a rather curious description. I have certainly exerted extensive effort to this point including a commitment of considerable personal resources.
Seriously folks. Lay off of Anthony. He's been busting his ass to set the record straight for a very long time. Just because he's not in your ear telling you everything does not mean he isn't working hard. Let him do his work.
 
Seriously folks. Lay off of Anthony. He's been busting his ass to set the record straight for a very long time. Just because he's not in your ear telling you everything does not mean he isn't working hard. Let him do his work.
I wish him all the best in his work

I applaud him for his work


If one wants to sit on the BOT, they should realize that "their work" is SUPPOSED TO require that they act as Responsible Stewards for the University
The easy stuff, is the stuff they fail on.......unfortunately, that is the stuff the are SUPPOSED TO be duty bound to perform.
Though I am not sure how many Penn Staters care about that, relative to how many prioritize "409/Freeh/Football" ahead of responsible governance.......based on election results as of late, the majority rests with the later.
 
None of the above.

Review of Freeh source materials continues.

Measure twice, cut once.

Lack of effort is a rather curious description. I have certainly exerted extensive effort to this point including a commitment of considerable personal resources.
Cool. What's the timeline? It's 2017. Are we doing this or what?
 
Barry, I'm just hoping eventually the good wins out,. While I still support Anthonys' behind the scene work. I know Mark has made a bundle off his relationships with those supposed to representPSU.
 
Barry, I'm just hoping eventually the good wins out,. While I still support Anthonys' behind the scene work. I know Mark has made a bundle off his relationships with those supposed to representPSU.
With respect to responsible, righteous governance for Penn State:

No one is working for that - not behind the scenes, in front of the scenes, beside the scenes, in the scenes, around the scenes.........
 
Proud member of #TeamLubrano.
I am as well. I very much appreciated his opening up about the potential of Urbs being the coach at PSU a few weeks ago. We're not entitled to know that, but he told us anyway.

The problem is that Anthony and others in S.C. (and certainly Clinton County) know the truth, but no one can dare say anything.

Sad.

 
I am as well. I very much appreciated his opening up about the potential of Urbs being the coach at PSU a few weeks ago. We're not entitled to know that, but he told us anyway.

The problem is that Anthony and others in S.C. (and certainly Clinton County) know the truth, but no one can dare say anything.

Sad.

So........information wrt rumors on candidates for PSU HFC are now Governance Functions. :rolleyes:


"Who cares about Lubert 34-0.......Hundreds of Millions of dollars squandered......Aiding and Abetting Crooks and Thieves.......Buying "protection" for the Important People with $160,000,000 of PSU funds .......That doesn't matter!!!! Because now we know who may or may not have been interested in the PSU HFC position!!!!!!"


Louis Freeh: "Penn Staters put FOOTBALL ahead of basic human decency"

Are we trying to prove him right??????
 
  • Like
Reactions: Royal_Coaster
So........information wrt rumors on candidates for PSU HFC are now Governance Functions. :rolleyes:


"Who cares about Lubert 34-0.......Hundreds of Millions of dollars squandered......Aiding and Abetting Crooks and Thieves.......Buying "protection" for the Important People with $160,000,000 of PSU funds .......That doesn't matter!!!! Because now we know who may or may not have been interested in the PSU HFC position!!!!!!"


Louis Freeh: "Penn Staters put FOOTBALL ahead of basic human decency"

Are we trying to prove him right??????
What's to say or prove if you realize the entire case is a fraud Barry? Who's wants to fight that fight?

FFD to around 35:00

 
Last edited:
None of the above.

Review of Freeh source materials continues.

Measure twice, cut once.

Lack of effort is a rather curious description. I have certainly exerted extensive effort to this point including a commitment of considerable personal resources.
Thank you Anthony...I think I can speak for most of us here that we are grateful for your efforts.
 
I've heard rumblings that CR's alleged stalking ways may have made him persona non grata, but Anthony and Frank appear to have gone dark as well... now coming up on 4 months since the (iirc) September 17 foreshadowed news update from AL and I've been wondering what New Year's resolutions Frank may have made.

That jubileer poster. haven't heard much from him since he ran for BOT was it?
 
What's to say or prove if you realize the entire case is a fraud Barry? Who's wants to fight that fight?
What's to say or prove if you realize the entire case is a fraud Barry? Who's wants to fight that fight?
Is it to much too ask:

To say "NO" when asked to support Lubert?



Is it too much to ask, when we see yet another exorbitantly overpriced Dambly project brought up for a vote:

To say:
"While I feel the purpose of this project, ___________ (fill in the blank - Brandywine Dorms, Fenske replacement etc etc etc ), is one that may fill a need, and I support the notion of providing _________.......I cannot vote in favor of allocating $XXXXX towards its funding.
The information at our disposal is insufficient to feel comfortable with the financials (because the details of the projects are never supplied to the other Trustees - even when they specifically ask for them)…..and the history of several capital spending projects proposed under the current leadership of the Board and of the Capital Spending Committee…..give me significant reason to pause.
I would be interested in revisiting this topic, as early as possible - - - but not until sufficient data is available, and until I can feel comfortable that processes are in palace to protect the University against inflated and excessive costs.


Or - when the project is a pure boondoggle:
“This project, it appears to me, does not answer any need in the furtherance of the University’s core missions - - EDUCATION, RESEARCH, AND OUTREACH. Therefore, I will not vote in favor of allocating $XXXX towards this project - - - especially when other mission-critical projects may require funding now and in the near future…”


I could certainly go on and on.....but these are BASIC, SIMPLE, CLEAR, situations - - - - - where even the most primitive form of responsible governance would call for actions far, far different from what we have received from EVERY member of the A9.

This stuff ain't even hard.......not even a little bit.

Is that too much to ask?

Certainly not.

Does anyone care? And here I am talking about US......does anyone care?

Based on the comments and actions of many........none of that matters to them as much as "409/Football/Freeh"


That is pathetic.


We get the Governance we demand (and, thus, the Governance we may deserve)
 
Is it to much too ask:

To say "NO" when asked to support Lubert?



Is it too much to ask, when we see yet another exorbitantly overpriced Dambly project brought up for a vote:

To say:
"While I feel the purpose of this project, ___________ (fill in the blank - Brandywine Dorms, Fenske replacement etc etc etc ), is one that may fill a need, and I support the notion of providing _________.......I cannot vote in favor of allocating $XXXXX towards its funding.
The information at our disposal is insufficient to feel comfortable with the financials (because the details of the projects are never supplied to the other Trustees - even when they specifically ask for them)…..and the history of several capital spending projects proposed under the current leadership of the Board and of the Capital Spending Committee…..give me significant reason to pause.
I would be interested in revisiting this topic, as early as possible - - - but not until sufficient data is available, and until I can feel comfortable that processes are in palace to protect the University against inflated and excessive costs.


Or - when the project is a pure boondoggle:
“This project, it appears to me, does not answer any need in the furtherance of the University’s core missions - - EDUCATION, RESEARCH, AND OUTREACH. Therefore, I will not vote in favor of allocating $XXXX towards this project - - - especially when other mission-critical projects may require funding now and in the near future…”


I could certainly go on and on.....but these are BASIC, SIMPLE, CLEAR, situations - - - - - where even the most primitive form of responsible governance would call for actions far, far different from what we have received from EVERY member of the A9.

This stuff ain't even hard.......not even a little bit.

Is that too much to ask?

Certainly not.

Does anyone care? And here I am talking about US......does anyone care?

Based on the comments and actions of many........none of that matters to them as much as "409/Football/Freeh"


That is pathetic.


We get the Governance we demand (and, thus, the Governance we may deserve)
Barry, you are way light on the # of xxxx's following the $ signs. Just sayin'. 9 x's are needed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: moofafoo
None of the above.

Review of Freeh source materials continues.

Measure twice, cut once.

Lack of effort is a rather curious description. I have certainly exerted extensive effort to this point including a commitment of considerable personal resources.

Thanks for your work on this. Obviously you can't speak to content but discovery to Amendola in 2012 suggested 17 pages of relevant 2001 emails up to and including June 5. Can you confirm that there were a number of communications not included in the report regarding 2001?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nellie R and Ski
Is it to much too ask:

To say "NO" when asked to support Lubert?



Is it too much to ask, when we see yet another exorbitantly overpriced Dambly project brought up for a vote:

To say:
"While I feel the purpose of this project, ___________ (fill in the blank - Brandywine Dorms, Fenske replacement etc etc etc ), is one that may fill a need, and I support the notion of providing _________.......I cannot vote in favor of allocating $XXXXX towards its funding.
The information at our disposal is insufficient to feel comfortable with the financials (because the details of the projects are never supplied to the other Trustees - even when they specifically ask for them)…..and the history of several capital spending projects proposed under the current leadership of the Board and of the Capital Spending Committee…..give me significant reason to pause.
I would be interested in revisiting this topic, as early as possible - - - but not until sufficient data is available, and until I can feel comfortable that processes are in palace to protect the University against inflated and excessive costs.


Or - when the project is a pure boondoggle:
“This project, it appears to me, does not answer any need in the furtherance of the University’s core missions - - EDUCATION, RESEARCH, AND OUTREACH. Therefore, I will not vote in favor of allocating $XXXX towards this project - - - especially when other mission-critical projects may require funding now and in the near future…”


I could certainly go on and on.....but these are BASIC, SIMPLE, CLEAR, situations - - - - - where even the most primitive form of responsible governance would call for actions far, far different from what we have received from EVERY member of the A9.

This stuff ain't even hard.......not even a little bit.

Is that too much to ask?

Certainly not.

Does anyone care? And here I am talking about US......does anyone care?

Based on the comments and actions of many........none of that matters to them as much as "409/Football/Freeh"


That is pathetic.


We get the Governance we demand (and, thus, the Governance we may deserve)
If only Barry was on the Board. Everything would be so black and white, and we could wrap everything up in 2... 3 months tops.
 
+1 (because it's still a thing)
FWIW.....I would agree that wrt "409/Freeh etc" A Lub can rightfully take a spot at the top of the podium.
And, for everyone who thinks that is important - and I get that it is/should be a huge number of folks who think that is important - appreciation is appropriate.

Unfortunately, we have 9 folks who are supposed to be responsible for something much bigger, much broader, and much more impactful (and, ironically enough, something that would do more to accomplish the "409" goals than anything else........
That thing being responsible governance for PSU.

And, on that count - - - - - a big fat FAIL for the entire group.


I get that no one cares about Penn State (or, at least only a small minority)...."Penn State" is a big, broad issue. Its a lot easier to only care about "409"
Its no different than state and local politics........have a candidate tell us what we want to hear about a particular issue we hold most dear (whether it be Abortion, or Gun Control, or Illegal Immigration, or ......409) and they have "our" full support.
Even if they fail on every broader issue of impact.....and none of what they do matches the rhetoric.

It is - unfortunately and usually - what it is.

The part about the situation here at PSU that IS bewildering, is that the Governance issues - at least making a righteous stand on governance issues - would be SIMPLE and 100 X EASIER than all the consternation that has gone into 409/Freeh.........and yet those folks charged with carrying out responsible governance simple REFUSE to make even the most basic and simply efforts.

It is absolutely F-ing mind blowing........and it is impossible to at least not ponder on WHY they refuse to do that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TJD88 and AvgUser
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT