ADVERTISEMENT

Won't get fooled again- The Collegian

For a public school, UVA notoriously attracts top-flight out-of-state talent. I've heard several times (pretty consistently) from professors, and TAs there that they can tell the difference based solely on the work product.

I assume the it's probably not entirely accurate, which is why I asked. I'm guessing a meh paper may more likely be an in-state student's work, whereas excellent work may have been written by either. Just curious to see if you noticed either way.

Ah, I see. My impression is that most students at UVA are pretty impressive and stack up pretty well against their private school contemporaries.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JJTopp99
Seeing as how poorly the generation communicates, yes, that's exactly what I'm saying.

My point in posting what I did was to say that there is more than one interpretation to the comment. But there's no sense in letting that get in the way of the BWI crusaders.
That's possible- if English is the kid's third language, maybe.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nits74
If you think that today's Penn State students are going to research the BWI/McAndrew board or Mark Pendergast's book or Ray Blehar's blog, etc., before they write a story referencing the Sandusky Scandal, you are really naive. Outside of the people who congregate on this message board, no one cares anymore about the "truth beneath the narrative."

Keep in mind, too, that not all students who write for the Collegian, maybe not even the majority of them, are Journalism majors. So, try to be less shocked when a Collegian story appears that does not pay homage to the assumption that Penn State was wronged and was totally innocent.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ThePennsyOracle
Nice to know we still have ignorant people running Psu and the newspaper also
 
If you think that today's Penn State students are going to research the BWI/McAndrew board or Mark Pendergast's book or Ray Blehar's blog, etc., before they write a story referencing the Sandusky Scandal, you are really naive. Outside of the people who congregate on this message board, no one cares anymore about the "truth beneath the narrative."

Keep in mind, too, that not all students who write for the Collegian, maybe not even the majority of them, are Journalism majors. So, try to be less shocked when a Collegian story appears that does not pay homage to the assumption that Penn State was wronged and was totally innocent.

The writer in this case is a broadcast journalism major, if that counts. And his column wasn't even remotely related to whether the sanctions were justified, but he couldn't pass up the opportunity to say that they were. Maybe an excuse can be made that he didn't know better, The same can't be said for his editors.
 
Like I've said before, so much of "higher" education now consists of dolts who teach and transform young adults into new dolts, and you see the results. It's a shame that parents have to shell out upwards of $200,000.00 just so their child can obtain a piece of paper so he or she can get a decent job while being indoctrinated and taking ridiculous and meaningless courses. More kids should go to trade school rather than attend these universities.
Don’t worry, after a few years in the real world where they have to pay bills and taxes, they will grow out of their thinking. There is a cure for youth .
 
The word "deserved" does not appear in the article Tom linked, nor the paragraph Tom posted.
“Rightfully so” is pretty close. Could be excusing PSU’s down on-field performance, but that wouldn’t be the more likely interp.

Either an ill-informed writer or a writer/editorial staff who wet the bed... all are free to choose.
 
Thats a good question because the Journ dept. at PSU is "supposedly" much better then when I was there in the 80's...so far I'm not seeing it.

When I worked (I received a paycheck) for the Daily Collegian , it was completely independent of the Journalism School. One should not reflect on the other although most employees (Yes, we were employees) of the Collegian are JSchool students. Having said that, the particular reporter's lack of knowledge, and the editors' lack of editorial supervision, reflect poorly on the publication's judgement and credibility
 
When I worked (I received a paycheck) for the Daily Collegian , it was completely independent of the Journalism School. One should not reflect on the other although most employees (Yes, we were employees) of the Collegian are JSchool students. Having said that, the particular reporter's lack of knowledge, and the editors' lack of editorial supervision, reflect poorly on the publication's judgement and credibility

I did as well. I was a photographer for them for a short time.
 
I once loved Penn State and eveything it stood for. Football games were just a reason to return to the university that I loved.

Then I was accused of having a culture problem as it related to sports, primarily football.

Post Nov 11, and now I only care about Penn State athletics. And even that isn’t to the degree it once was.

Isn’t it ironic that it took the accusations of the talking heads, BOT, and media to turn me into the person that I was accused of being before Nov 11?
 
Maybe I can make it clearer- the kid who wrote the article was maybe 7 when the Sandusky thing broke- so he couldn't actually "know" what happened, he had to have been "taught" what happened- presumably while a student at PSU. And if these are the lessons being taught at PSU, I will not support that.

This is a stupid comment.
 
I completely understand that sentiment. I am glad my daughter is at W&M.

My daughter is a junior at PSU and having a phenomenal experience academically and socially so I am glad that she is at PSU. It's too bad that some of you have allowed your view of the Sandusky scandal to cloud your judgment about the school itself. My son was a student-athlete at the school in 2011 as a freshman and, with the exception of the few months following the scandal, had an otherwise fantastic experience during his time there.

Not really trying to change minds here, you feel how you feel, but just thought I'd add my 2cents as a parent of a recent graduate and current student. It may no longer be a special place to you for whatever reasons but I can tell you for certain that it is a special place to the young men and women that have recently graduated as well as current students.
 
If you think that today's Penn State students are going to research the BWI/McAndrew board or Mark Pendergast's book or Ray Blehar's blog, etc., before they write a story referencing the Sandusky Scandal, you are really naive. Outside of the people who congregate on this message board, no one cares anymore about the "truth beneath the narrative."

Keep in mind, too, that not all students who write for the Collegian, maybe not even the majority of them, are Journalism majors. So, try to be less shocked when a Collegian story appears that does not pay homage to the assumption that Penn State was wronged and was totally innocent.
If they dont care about the truth of a particular topic they are writing about, then it is not journalism. It is advertising.
 
Maybe I can make it clearer- the kid who wrote the article was maybe 7 when the Sandusky thing broke- so he couldn't actually "know" what happened, he had to have been "taught" what happened- presumably while a student at PSU. And if these are the lessons being taught at PSU, I will not support that.

He was 14
 
I once loved Penn State and eveything it stood for. Football games were just a reason to return to the university that I loved.

Then I was accused of having a culture problem as it related to sports, primarily football.

Post Nov 11, and now I only care about Penn State athletics. And even that isn’t to the degree it once was.

Isn’t it ironic that it took the accusations of the talking heads, BOT, and media to turn me into the person that I was accused of being before Nov 11?

+1. Pretty much am right there with you.
 
My daughter is a junior at PSU and having a phenomenal experience academically and socially so I am glad that she is at PSU. It's too bad that some of you have allowed your view of the Sandusky scandal to cloud your judgment about the school itself. My son was a student-athlete at the school in 2011 as a freshman and, with the exception of the few months following the scandal, had an otherwise fantastic experience during his time there.

Not really trying to change minds here, you feel how you feel, but just thought I'd add my 2cents as a parent of a recent graduate and current student. It may no longer be a special place to you for whatever reasons but I can tell you for certain that it is a special place to the young men and women that have recently graduated as well as current students.

I am happy for you and your kids. Having said that, this statement strikes me as odd: " too bad that some of you have allowed your view of the Sandusky scandal to cloud your judgment ". I don't feel like I 'allowed' this to happen or that it "clouds my judgement". Reagan was once asked why he left the Democratic party and he said "I didn't leave them, they left me." I feel that way about PSU. Perhaps it was always there and I never saw it. Regardless, PSU is tied to the local politicians and is as corrupt as any location in the nation. What is worse is that the combination of public funding and lack of transparency in governance is ruining the school.

Sandusky is the symptom, and not the cause.

An unholy alliance between school, govt, and charity (sprinkling in lack of transparency) are making PSU no different than any other corrupt organization. It is what it is.
 
I am happy for you and your kids. Having said that, this statement strikes me as odd: " too bad that some of you have allowed your view of the Sandusky scandal to cloud your judgment ". I don't feel like I 'allowed' this to happen or that it "clouds my judgement". Reagan was once asked why he left the Democratic party and he said "I didn't leave them, they left me." I feel that way about PSU. Perhaps it was always there and I never saw it. Regardless, PSU is tied to the local politicians and is as corrupt as any location in the nation. What is worse is that the combination of public funding and lack of transparency in governance is ruining the school.

Sandusky is the symptom, and not the cause.

An unholy alliance between school, govt, and charity (sprinkling in lack of transparency) are making PSU no different than any other corrupt organization. It is what it is.

It's your fault for ever thinking there wasn't an "unholy alliance between school, govt, and charity" at Penn State.
 
BTW, I have a Penn State degree, and so do two of my kids - both of them in 2010.

I take no pleasure in feeling the way that I now do about the institution that I once loved.
 
I am happy for you and your kids. Having said that, this statement strikes me as odd: " too bad that some of you have allowed your view of the Sandusky scandal to cloud your judgment ". I don't feel like I 'allowed' this to happen or that it "clouds my judgement". Reagan was once asked why he left the Democratic party and he said "I didn't leave them, they left me." I feel that way about PSU. Perhaps it was always there and I never saw it. Regardless, PSU is tied to the local politicians and is as corrupt as any location in the nation. What is worse is that the combination of public funding and lack of transparency in governance is ruining the school.

Sandusky is the symptom, and not the cause.

An unholy alliance between school, govt, and charity (sprinkling in lack of transparency) are making PSU no different than any other corrupt organization. It is what it is.
Like the organized crime analogy. JVP was no longer useful and they had him wacked. Plain and simple.
 
Thats a good question because the Journ dept. at PSU is "supposedly" much better then when I was there in the 80's...so far I'm not seeing it.

I actually remember the J-school at PSU had a really great reputation in the late 70s. I think journalism in general has devolved since then, correlating with the decline and fall of the newspaper business and the news business in general.
 
I actually remember the J-school at PSU had a really great reputation in the late 70s. I think journalism in general has devolved since then, correlating with the decline and fall of the newspaper business and the news business in general.

I know it wasn't "considered" anything special when I was there in the early 80's.
I think its now more highly regarded. I know that Steve Manuel really helped lead the way to improving
it, especially from the PhotoJourn side of it.
 
“Rightfully so” is pretty close. Could be excusing PSU’s down on-field performance, but that wouldn’t be the more likely interp.

Either an ill-informed writer or a writer/editorial staff who wet the bed... all are free to choose.

I was wondering if he "played us" like a David Jones to get clicks and comments. I looked on-line and saw that there were, when I checked, no comments to his article. So, my thought doesn't hold water.

I'll agree that he has been fed a narrative that has been cemented since he was 13-14 years old.
 
I was wondering if he "played us" like a David Jones to get clicks and comments. I looked on-line and saw that there were, when I checked, no comments to his article. So, my thought doesn't hold water.

I'll agree that he has been fed a narrative that has been cemented since he was 13-14 years old.
I expect your thought was right on.
 
Can't help but wonder if they'd have had the stones to burn Joe had he survived 2012.

If Joe had any fight left in him, AND if he kept his son, Scott, hidden and muzzled, things most certainly would have been different.
 
The article in question is an opinion piece in the Daily Collegian. You can access it at THIS LINK.

The paragraph in question is:

"Since Penn State upset Ohio State in 2016, we’ve witnessed the meteoric rise of a program which was struck down by sanctions — and rightfully so — followed by relative constancy as one of the nation’s top-20 teams. McSorley is a main contributor to that continued success, and his toughness and big-play capability came at a time Penn State needed it most."

It does pain me that a current junior at PSU (majoring in Broadcast Journalism with minors in Psychology and International Studies) would be this ignorant of what happened in 2011. That said, I don't quite get the connection that many of you seem to be drawing between the opinion piece in the Daily Collegian, and actions (including fundraising) of the PSU administration.

One could also read that paragraph as saying the sanctions rightfully caused the program to be struck down (i.e. lose more). In other words, not as a comment on the righteousness of placing sanctions against Penn State.
If that’s what they meant it was very poorly worded!
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT