ADVERTISEMENT

You Go Reilly Gains

What can a persecuted white male Karen do these days to defend himself from all the transgender hate speech directed his way. I recommend arming up against the rising tide of hateful violent transgenders before we white male heteros are persecuted into distinction. The beatings and harassment we face from the transgender thugs is unconscionable. From the vandalism of our houses with spray painted hate speech to the burning down of our churches and gentlemen clubs by the transgenders leads to fear in our children. It all starts with the unprovoked neverending hate speech by transgenders against us . We must rise up and stem the tide before we are all forced at gun point to cross dress or to be beaten to death by transgender purses!

.....😂
quite a broad brush you are painting with. Most people, vast majority, don't care about transgendered people. At issue is an uneven playing field and the damage this will do to women's sports and women's causes. The right of trans and women are colliding. I think one can side with trans or women, without being accused of trans "hate speech" or being anti-women.
 
I don’t know what to tell you. I thought you knew me from way back. It’s ok though. I took off a few years. I’m on your side. Believe that.

No worries, Pelly. Sometimes I think the wiser course would be to forget social media, turn off the "news" (which more often than not is advancement of narratives or outright propaganda), tune out the hollering that passes for discourse these days...and simply live our lives and raise our children in accordance with the values we believe in and know to be true...even if they've become unfashionable.

But my resolve to tune out never seems to last more than a day or two... ;)
 
  • Like
Reactions: 81b&w and bison13
No worries, Pelly. Sometimes I think the wiser course would be to forget social media, turn off the "news" (which more often than not is advancement of narratives or outright propaganda), tune out the hollering that passes for discourse these days...and simply live our lives and raise our children in accordance with the values we believe in and know to be true...even if they've become unfashionable.

But my resolve to tune out never seems to last more than a day or two... ;)
Which is exactly what they want us to do…….

Never, never, never, never, never surrender!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hotshoe
People supporting gender equality must be tying themselves up in knots when gender now is considered fluid - who is equal to whom? and is Title IX now gone? The soccer mom's whose daughters are going to lose out on scholly's are going to be pissed.

They did it when a bunch of males showed up to a women's employment event claiming to be fluid. Suddenly the event organizer was claiming the males weren't fluid, as if he's suddenly allowed to question it.
 
It's mindboggling that she isn't supported by 100% of the US. The only way that this inanity is going to stop is for biological females to refuse to compete in any races, etc., against biological males. Can you really have a race if nobody shows up? In the alternative, maybe schools just should start to field teams, like women's hoops, with all biological males, and have them play against teams like UConn women's hoops; maybe it would be fun seeing UConn lose by a 100 points in a game like that.
She would be supported (and probably is supported) by 95%+. The problem is allowing the subject to slip to anti trans. That's what the people in favor of this want. Stick to the issue of unfairness in women's sports and it's a slam dunk.
 
Interested to know…what did they think our president said?
Didn’t have them repeat or quote her. But I can say my middle son is at PSU Altoona. He is getting the classes he needs and his ultimate goal is to become a PA State Trooper. He said they had some debate in his classes yesterday about it. So, I don’t know what they “think” they heard, but they at least talked about it.
 
She would be supported (and probably is supported) by 95%+. The problem is allowing the subject to slip to anti trans. That's what the people in favor of this want. Stick to the issue of unfairness in women's sports and it's a slam dunk.
that's right. It is hard to have a rational conversation without someone labeling you as anti-gay, anti-trans, racist, xenophobic, or misogynistic. The fact is that these are nuanced concepts that can't be solved with a light switch decision. Everyone wants to classify you as this or that. Life isn't that simple.
 
What can a persecuted white male Karen do these days to defend himself from all the transgender hate speech directed his way. I recommend arming up against the rising tide of hateful violent transgenders before we white male heteros are persecuted into distinction. The beatings and harassment we face from the transgender thugs is unconscionable. From the vandalism of our houses with spray painted hate speech to the burning down of our churches and gentlemen clubs by the transgenders leads to fear in our children. It all starts with the unprovoked neverending hate speech by transgenders against us . We must rise up and stem the tide before we are all forced at gun point to cross dress or to be beaten to death by transgender purses!

.....😂

You actually strike me as a white male Karen, and I don't like that because I know several real Karen's and they are genuinely nice people.
 
that's right. It is hard to have a rational conversation without someone labeling you as anti-gay, anti-trans, racist, xenophobic, or misogynistic. The fact is that these are nuanced concepts that can't be solved with a light switch decision. Everyone wants to classify you as this or that. Life isn't that simple.
They have no intention of rational discussion. They are about force, intimidation, power, disinformation, mind control, and brainwashing.
 
Easy Peasy.

An "Open" league where anyone can compete

A "Biological Female" league where you had to be born as a biological female.

we can have handicapped leagues, performance-enhanced drug leagues (WWF), people over 50, short people, fat people, tall people, and so on and so forth. But we can't decide that anyone who starts a league should be paid the same or get the same 'ships.

Yet. There will never be agreement on what constitutes a biologically born female among scientists, competitors or organizations like the Olympic Committee. There will even be arguments among the committee members is what constitutes a biologically woman. Seems too many people want to create realities that don't exist and will argue their intent to infinity.

I say put them all in a coliseum with lions and a bulls and they all compete against each other regardless of whatever sex or degree of the sex they are or are not or think they are for that matter. It wouldn't make great theater and the gaming entities could have over and under parlays for number of animals killed number of supposed females killed and/or number of supposed men killed in each competition Heck even a over-under for number of we're not sure killed during each competition. The way we are as a people and culture today I am sure such an arrangement and event would get incredible TV ratings.
 
Yet. There will never be agreement on what constitutes a biologically born female among scientists, competitors or organizations like the Olympic Committee. There will even be arguments among the committee members is what constitutes a biologically woman. Seems too many people want to create realities that don't exist and will argue their intent to infinity.

I say put them all in a coliseum with lions and a bulls and they all compete against each other regardless of whatever sex or degree of the sex they are or are not or think they are for that matter. It wouldn't make great theater and the gaming entities could have over and under parlays for number of animals killed number of supposed females killed and/or number of supposed men killed in each competition Heck even a over-under for number of we're not sure killed during each competition. The way we are as a people and culture today I am sure such an arrangement and event would get incredible TV ratings.
Your first paragraph is spot on. As such, educated discussions are in line and imperative. Not accusations of anti-gay hate. That isn't helpful, in fact, the opposite.

To you second paragraph, you are calling for the elimination of women's sports. OK. I don't think that is going to fly. We are either going to have a category named "women's sports" or we aren't. If we are, we are going to have to define it so that the grey areas are understood and defined just as performance enhancing drugs are today. The easiest thing to say is "what was your assigned gender at birth?" Hell, I just had to update my passport and couldn't get through the application without defining myself as male or female. There were no other options.
 
Didn’t have them repeat or quote her. But I can say my middle son is at PSU Altoona. He is getting the classes he needs and his ultimate goal is to become a PA State Trooper. He said they had some debate in his classes yesterday about it. So, I don’t know what they “think” they heard, but they at least talked about it.
Thanks. I asked because there seems to be a misunderstanding in what Nelli said, or that she just released that video (when searching to see if she's said anything at all, there are headlines from conservative sites about her calling Riley a "bigot", just as we've seen claimed on this board). From what I've seen, we're still waiting for her to make any type of comment on this issue.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Obliviax
Thanks. I asked because there seems to be a misunderstanding in what Nelli said, or that she just released that video (when searching to see if she's said anything at all, there are headlines from conservative sites about her calling Riley a "bigot", just as we've seen claimed on this board). From what I've seen, we're still waiting for her to make any type of comment on this issue.
Agreed. Nelli released this before the Gaines situation. If you listen to it, she is promoting the notion that uncomfortable conversations need to be had. This video came up after Gaines' speech was cancelled.

PSU stated that Gaines event was cancelled because of a SNAFU on permitting for an indoor event. They stated it had nothing to do with the content. They offered to reschedule it as an outdoor event or indoor at a later time.

PSU's action or inaction appears to be much ado about nothing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Erial_Lion
Your first paragraph is spot on. As such, educated discussions are in line and imperative. Not accusations of anti-gay hate. That isn't helpful, in fact, the opposite.

To you second paragraph, you are calling for the elimination of women's sports. OK. I don't think that is going to fly. We are either going to have a category named "women's sports" or we aren't. If we are, we are going to have to define it so that the grey areas are understood and defined just as performance enhancing drugs are today. The easiest thing to say is "what was your assigned gender at birth?" Hell, I just had to update my passport and couldn't get through the application without defining myself as male or female. There were no other options.
What are you talking about? You agree with "them" that there: "will never be agreement on what constitutes a biologically born female"? This has been settled for over a hundred years. This thing is simple: if you have xy chromosomes you play on the xy team and if you have xx chromosomes you play on the xx team. No need to discuss anything related to gender when picking teams, nor should it matter how one identifies during the picking process.

Do males have different chromosomes than females?​

"Yes, they differ in a pair of chromosomes known as the sex chromosomes. Females have two X chromosomes in their cells, while males have one X and one Y chromosome.
Inheriting too many or not enough copies of sex chromosomes can lead to serious problems. For example, females who have extra copies of the X chromosome are usually taller than average and some have mental disability. Males with more than one X chromosome have Klinefelter syndrome, which is a condition characterized by tall stature and, often, impaired fertility. Another syndrome caused by imbalance in the number of sex chromosomes is Turner syndrome. Women with Turner have one X chromosome only. They are very short, usually do not undergo puberty and some may have kidney or heart problems."

 
  • Like
Reactions: johnmpsu
that's right. It is hard to have a rational conversation without someone labeling you as anti-gay, anti-trans, racist, xenophobic, or misogynistic. The fact is that these are nuanced concepts that can't be solved with a light switch decision. Everyone wants to classify you as this or that. Life isn't that simple.
You can’t - that is the tool that is used to prevent a discussion on some topics - want a secure border - anti-immigrant racist - biological women want a level playing field - Transphobic - what this does is harden both sides and is counter productive. Unreal what some consider hate speech these days.
 
What are you talking about? You agree with "them" that there: "will never be agreement on what constitutes a biologically born female"? This has been settled for over a hundred years. This thing is simple: if you have xy chromosomes you play on the xy team and if you have xx chromosomes you play on the xx team. No need to discuss anything related to gender when picking teams, nor should it matter how one identifies during the picking process.

Do males have different chromosomes than females?​

"Yes, they differ in a pair of chromosomes known as the sex chromosomes. Females have two X chromosomes in their cells, while males have one X and one Y chromosome.
Inheriting too many or not enough copies of sex chromosomes can lead to serious problems. For example, females who have extra copies of the X chromosome are usually taller than average and some have mental disability. Males with more than one X chromosome have Klinefelter syndrome, which is a condition characterized by tall stature and, often, impaired fertility. Another syndrome caused by imbalance in the number of sex chromosomes is Turner syndrome. Women with Turner have one X chromosome only. They are very short, usually do not undergo puberty and some may have kidney or heart problems."

That is a choice. I have no problem with it. However, it does not take into consideration people that were born as one sex but recognizes as the other

I don't have to agree with it. I certainly don't understand it. I certainly don't recommend it. But I have to recognize that there is a class of people who are born A and want to be B. We can chose to leave them out on a limb with no option other than to compete in the male or "open" category. (it really isn't 'male', anyone can compete in the sports in this category as we've already seen). We already have categories for handicapped players. they have their own olympics. So what is "handicapped"? Maybe there is a definition, I haven't looked into it. Can a person that lost an arm compete in races that have little to do with arms? How about the blade runner who's blades can be considered an enhancement over other types of appendages.

The list of "sub categories" could be endless. Having a "women's" category is the first sub-category interestingly. Why do we have it? Govt wanted to give women the same opportunities as men in terms of athletics and, potentially, the money thereof. So it comes down to money. Are we going to let them compete in whatever gender they want? Are we going to let people compete in a woman only? Are we going to create several sub-categories to account for every permutation? How about an event for people with restless leg syndrome, fibromyalgia, crohn's disease, depression......
 
That is a choice. I have no problem with it. However, it does not take into consideration people that were born as one sex but recognizes as the other

I don't have to agree with it. I certainly don't understand it. I certainly don't recommend it. But I have to recognize that there is a class of people who are born A and want to be B. We can chose to leave them out on a limb with no option other than to compete in the male or "open" category. (it really isn't 'male', anyone can compete in the sports in this category as we've already seen). We already have categories for handicapped players. they have their own olympics. So what is "handicapped"? Maybe there is a definition, I haven't looked into it. Can a person that lost an arm compete in races that have little to do with arms? How about the blade runner who's blades can be considered an enhancement over other types of appendages.

The list of "sub categories" could be endless. Having a "women's" category is the first sub-category interestingly. Why do we have it? Govt wanted to give women the same opportunities as men in terms of athletics and, potentially, the money thereof. So it comes down to money. Are we going to let them compete in whatever gender they want? Are we going to let people compete in a woman only? Are we going to create several sub-categories to account for every permutation? How about an event for people with restless leg syndrome, fibromyalgia, crohn's disease, depression......
So, you feel a third category is warranted? I'm all for letting the trans athlete's compete against each other. However, if they want to be on one of the other teams they'd have to match chromosome type. I'm sure if there is enough demand schools will create teams. Really is a simple solution.
 
So, you feel a third category is warranted? I'm all for letting the trans athlete's compete against each other. However, if they want to be on one of the other teams they'd have to match chromosome type. I'm sure if there is enough demand schools will create teams. Really is a simple solution.
I didn't state an opinion. I was trying to get closed minded posters to open their minds and think.
 
Your first paragraph is spot on. As such, educated discussions are in line and imperative. Not accusations of anti-gay hate. That isn't helpful, in fact, the opposite.

To you second paragraph, you are calling for the elimination of women's sports. OK. I don't think that is going to fly. We are either going to have a category named "women's sports" or we aren't. If we are, we are going to have to define it so that the grey areas are understood and defined just as performance enhancing drugs are today. The easiest thing to say is "what was your assigned gender at birth?" Hell, I just had to update my passport and couldn't get through the application without defining myself as male or female. There were no other options.
And you agree that there will not be attorneys and calling and witnesses and scientists with volumes of data to challenge You agree at birth. Lol

Fully on board with the name calling and Animus needing to be tossed overboard by all parties regarding this topic. What I'm saying is Americans have lost the ability to communicate reasonably and civilly. So everybody needs to get over it but it won't happen. What can I say except This topic in these arguments are a waste of time.
 
And you agree that there will not be attorneys and calling and witnesses and scientists with volumes of data to challenge You agree at birth. Lol

Fully on board with the name calling and Animus needing to be tossed overboard by all parties regarding this topic. What I'm saying is Americans have lost the ability to communicate reasonably and civilly. So everybody needs to get over it but it won't happen. What can I say except This topic in these arguments are a waste of time.
I do agree but at some point, we cannot accommodate everybody's nuanced issues. For example, in college I ran a 4.6 forty yard dash with only a 30' inseam. I was also a pretty good hurdler in track. I am thinking about petitioning for a hurdling competition for people who recognize as men who are over the age of 25 and have in inseam of 30' or less.

To that point, I know a school administrator who told me she had to blow all of her discretionary budget for a poor young man who was confined to a wheelchair due to a rare illness. The child's attorney successfully argued that this kid deserved the same access as the other kids as per Ohio law. They had to build all kinds of access and set up technology in each classroom in case there was a health emergency. This was, of course, to the detriment of the other 99.99% of kids that could have used that funding for other items that benefitted more people.
 
Fully on board with the name calling and Animus needing to be tossed overboard by all parties regarding this topic. What I'm saying is Americans have lost the ability to communicate reasonably and civilly. So everybody needs to get over it but it won't happen. What can I say except This topic in these arguments are a waste of time.
Give me a break…didn’t you call someone an idiot fool ahole jerkoff in this thread?
 
  • Like
Reactions: GregInPitt
You get to decide who is close-minded?
Yes.

In that case, the poster was stating that anyone who was against trans and trans gendered people competing in woman's sports was a homophobe. Fact is, many trans people are trans without being gay (Caitlyn Jenner for example). People don't come in neat boxes. So, yes, in this case, I was trying to open the eyes of a poster to admit that this wasn't a simply yes or no issue.
 
Yes.

In that case, the poster was stating that anyone who was against trans and trans gendered people competing in woman's sports was a homophobe. Fact is, many trans people are trans without being gay (Caitlyn Jenner for example). People don't come in neat boxes. So, yes, in this case, I was trying to open the eyes of a poster to admit that this wasn't a simply yes or no issue.
Congrats. Anyone that doesn’t feel the way you do is closed-minded.
 
No worries, Pelly. Sometimes I think the wiser course would be to forget social media, turn off the "news" (which more often than not is advancement of narratives or outright propaganda), tune out the hollering that passes for discourse these days...and simply live our lives and raise our children in accordance with the values we believe in and know to be true...even if they've become unfashionable.

But my resolve to tune out never seems to last more than a day or two... ;)
That sounds good but the issue is that schools and some gov't entities are not allowing parents to raise thir children with the values of the parents and therein we have the collision. Most parents do not want to be forced into accepting the transgender ideology, nor do they want their children being force fed that lifestyle through participation in classroom and/or assembly instruction, required book reading, observations of special days @ school for alternative lifestyles or forcing thir children o share restrooms and lockerrooms with those of the opposite biological sex.
 
That sounds good but the issue is that schools and some gov't entities are not allowing parents to raise thir children with the values of the parents and therein we have the collision. Most parents do not want to be forced into accepting the transgender ideology, nor do they want their children being force fed that lifestyle through participation in classroom and/or assembly instruction, required book reading, observations of special days @ school for alternative lifestyles or forcing thir children o share restrooms and lockerrooms with those of the opposite biological sex.

Yup, I do get that and agree with your point, but it may be too late. The reality is that a lot of parents don't know or care...and the public schools, like many other institutions, have been corrupted. The inmates run the asylum now, and the facts produced in your above comment testify to that.

Back in the day we sent six kids through public schools successfully, but I'm glad that 13 years after the last one graduated, all our grandchildren are either home- or privately-schooled.
 
Yup, I do get that and agree with your point, but it may be too late. The reality is that a lot of parents don't know or care...and the public schools, like many other institutions, have been corrupted. The inmates run the asylum now, and the facts produced in your above comment testify to that.

Back in the day we sent six kids through public schools successfully, but I'm glad that 13 years after the last one graduated, all our grandchildren are either home- or privately-schooled.
It is very difficult for parents who cannot afford a private school education and or economics dictate that both parents have to work negating the homeschooling option. They are trapped in school systems that have lost their moral compass.
 
Add this to the comment of biological males kicking UConn's women by 100 points and understand that just because you are male, and are a decent basketball player, it doesn't automatically mean you can "beat" the women.

I was a skinny 3 starter on an Open IM Basketball Final 4 team my senior year at University Park. Used to play in a Professor Pick up game in Rec Hall during lunch when the PSU women's team would be warming up. Often they would play- and get the better of me and most of the "males" out there.

I agree w Obli- whatever the old definitions were for just about everything- are changing. Male/Female, Facts/Alternative Facts, Truth/Lies, Hero/Villian. We all are plugged into whatever side we choose on whatever issue we are talking about and then filter it via our paradigm. Not many are open to discussion, compromise or change (unless of course it is their opinion which they think everyone else should accommodate.)

Personally- I have no idea how this Transgender landscape will alter collegiate athletics- I also have no faith that the NCAA can manage it. Like the South African murderer with the springs for legs that "won" an Olympic medal....is that REALLY "winning?" There are bigger fish for us to fry in my mind- but cannot disagree with either position. Trans athletes should be able to compete somewhere/ somehow and biologically female gendered athletes should have a level playing field. Where the two intersect? Unfortunately probably courts will decide....and nobody will be happy.
I believe it is the consensus of basketball experts is that a good boys high school team would easily defeat the NCAA NC Women’s champion.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT