What year did he try to call Joe?
2/14: Jessie Keith, Survivor(?) of Jerry Sandusky’s abuse speaks out. Article & video
- Thread starter coveydidnt
- Start date
What year did he try to call Joe?
The interview just asserted he was one of 9 or 10 "overcomers". No further details or questions.
Shocks me...na.
thanks, but I'm not a member of facebook, or the other popular ones modes of written communication.
It's too painful for them to get into details or ask any questions. You just have to accept everything they say as being the truth. And admire their collection of new cars and their 6000 square foot house.
Your face.....there appears to be something on it. Egg, perhaps.
He texted Joe in 1991. Joe texted back, "Don't bother me. I have a season to get ready for."
Last edited:
You defend Jerry's son who was molesting people. GFY
All from before the scandal took place. Any pro-Paterno posts since after NOvember 2011?
Well then pay him Ira, by all means. Even though by all accounts Joe didn't text...
The most interesting aspect to his story is who were the people he complained to that told him not to cause trouble?? That seems pretty extremely important no?
This woman (who appears to be Jesse's mother) posted this on his wall on Nov 3, 2014.
Last edited:
No, I find it a great failure if he reported abuse to his guidance councilors and nothing was done about it. I would appreciate you not being such a prick though.
Wow.
Do these people who write the stories (no longer can be called 'journalists') do any social media research at all? If you and others here can find this stuff so easily, why don't they bother? (I know the reasons, I'm just bitching).
But really..... no one had the intellectual curiosity to look up McCue after Ganim's story last year, and if they had, they would have seen some real wacky stuff about him and maybe someone would have offered up a couple of questions before either running the story or supporting it.
Here..... wow... regardless if he was abused by JS or not. This guy is running a kids-oriented business? This is what he thinks is ok to put out on social media when peeps research his business? Gaa.
Peel back one layer, folks.... just one. You might find something interesting and thought-provoking. You know, if another bright, shiny object doesn't catch your eye first.
And this guy (Jesse's brother?) posted the same link on his wall a few days earlier on Oct 31, 2014.
Kim Isenberg Manigo And the attorneys will try to get 59.1 million of that money.
November 3, 2014 at 5:46pm
Kim Isenberg Manigo And the attorneys will try to get 59.1 million of that money.
November 3, 2014 at 5:46pm
Last edited:
Sure you do. Just like you find it "a great failure" for Central Mountain HS to promote Steve Turchetta to school principal after it was discovered that he told Aaron Fisher to STFU about Jerry Sandusky in 2007. You care so much that you're willing to post 409 more times about CSSP to prove it.
Once again, I believe Sandusky is guilty, but are you saying that the 70's victims were not liars? Victim 9 actually did go to lunch with Sandusky AND Joe Paterno?
Shouldn't anyone claiming to be a victim of CSA be thoroughly vetted, or should we just take them all at their word and throw checks at them like Ira did?
So go ahead and "F me" and call me a member of a cult because I believe several of the "victims" lied or embellished their abuse for money and attention.
I don't know about the 70's victims that we've heard of. But Jerry didn't suddenly become an abuser in 1998.
He also has no problem with the CEO of The Second Mile letting children down and not reporting it despite having a LEGAL OBLIGATION under CPS Law to initiate an investigation with DPW once Tim Curley made a report to him regarding the 2001 Incident! Go figure....
I've seen the victims he's been convicted of molesting get drug through the gutter and then some on this board. Stop burying your head in the sand.
When shit doesn't add up, it gets called out. You sound like someone who believes everything you hear, or only what you want to hear.
You want to hear Jerry was innocent so it can exonerate Joe, you hypocrite. People like You have serious issues.
Must be nice to have it so well you think a coach getting fired is the worst adversity you faced in your life. Snowflake.
It sucked and all but I've long gotten over it. You guys can't so you resort to the free Jerry BS, which gives our critics all the ammo they need to continue the cult narrative.
We just made it to the rose bowl and STILL a good chunk of threads are about Sandusky, other random unrelated threads about rape and molestation, etc. WTF is wrong with you guys?
The info at the following link is very worthy of the relatively small time investment: http://www.icmec.org/wp-content/upl...Backlash-and-Professionalism-Lanning-1996.pdf
Credit goes to @JmmyW for the referral.
Credit goes to @JmmyW for the referral.
Asking a question of those who know more about child abusers and pedophiles- how common is it for a pedophile to choose a victim of a different race?
Role model material. His business success with children is all but assured.
This board has people supporting Jerry and shaming/denying victims. Despite that, some idiot makes the claim that I am the one who doesn't care about the victims. It's a disturbing dynamic that is allowed to permeate here. And then you all wonder why some outsiders use the word "cult."
Oh cool, you reply with memes. People like you are why civil discourse has gone down the crapper.
According to zig this article is about Jessie's father.
No explanation as to name change.
http://www.ebony.com/news-views/the-curious-case-of-edward-manigo#axzz4YmXq2FWe
No explanation as to name change.
http://www.ebony.com/news-views/the-curious-case-of-edward-manigo#axzz4YmXq2FWe
Where is the evidence that anyone failed him? Or that he was abused at all? Or even any evidence that he MET Sandusky?
Btw, at the trial the prosecutors went out of their way to establish the fact that Sandusky had a physical type and liked blonde, blue-eyed boys
I don't think that's true. I think its fair to question some of the alleged victims when their stories are inconsistent or if they changed their story after a lawyer waved money at them. Questioning these people is not the same as calling all of the victims liars or saying that Sandusky is completely innocent.
That's a sad story.
FWIW I always have trouble believing these stories that PSU officials kept firing people and covering up for Sandusky. I can understand why people might try to cover their own rear ends or try to get rid of JS quietly, but it makes no sense that they would knowingly allow JS to perpetuate his crimes for decades. There's just no motivation to do that.
