Disagree, add him to Coon + Abounader + Pantaleo + (I forget the 4th guy shirting) and Meatchicken is solidly in 3rd, and possibly making the Tanners look over their shoulders.
MicicDisagree, add him to Coon + Abounader + Pantaleo + (I forget the 4th guy shirting) and Meatchicken is solidly in 3rd, and possibly making the Tanners look over their shoulders.
Brands will not get the boot next year. They have planned for next year being a rebuilding year (just like Cael did in 2015), and his leash is longer than you may believe. Good things are happening at Iowa, but the same can be said at several other schools as well. As long as we take care of our business, I'm really not that concerned. That said, I could certainly see UM finishing higher than Iowa next year. They will struggle for 70 points.I've predicted this for about a year... PSU, OSU and UM will all finish higher than Iowa next year. There is no question about that. My prediction is Brands gets the boot from Iowa. They will have accepted mediocrity if they don't make a move. Especially factoring in the Dresser decision at ISU and that soon to be pressure.
I did the math. Added (shirts 2016 results + Beazley 2017) to Michigan's 2017 team score, and that puts them at 91 points, just behind Iowa. Then drop other teams for their seniors leaving, and that puts scUM 3rd -- without factoring how their guys would move up from other seniors leaving.Micic
I see Michigan with about 75 points next year. Depending on the year, that'll get you anywhere from 3rd to 6th. I took the lowered expectations because I hear that Michigan is making the leap every year but they never seem to do so. Maybe they do that this year, but I'm hedging the bet. I'll stick with #5 and you can remind me next March. Wouldn't be my first mistake.
we shall seeI did the math. Added (shirts 2016 results + Beazley 2017) to Michigan's 2017 team score, and that puts them at 91 points, just behind Iowa. Then drop other teams for their seniors leaving, and that puts scUM 3rd -- without factoring how their guys would move up from other seniors leaving.
Brands will not get the boot next year. They have planned for next year being a rebuilding year (just like Cael did in 2015), and his leash is longer than you may believe. Good things are happening at Iowa, but the same can be said at several other schools as well. As long as we take care of our business, I'm really not that concerned. That said, I could certainly see UM finishing higher than Iowa next year. They will struggle for 70 points.
Brands will not get the boot next year. They have planned for next year being a rebuilding year (just like Cael did in 2015), and his leash is longer than you may believe. Good things are happening at Iowa, but the same can be said at several other schools as well. As long as we take care of our business, I'm really not that concerned. That said, I could certainly see UM finishing higher than Iowa next year. They will struggle for 70 points.
Meatchicken thread turned into Fire Brands at Iowa!
Michigan already was looking good for 2017-18. Now they have:
133: Micic
141: Fisher
149: Pantaleo
165: Massa
174: Mahomes
184: Abounader
197: Beazley
Hwt: Coon
Not sure what they'll have at 125 (maybe 141) and 157, but that's a very solid team!
Better than the Diabetes Scholarship stuff on HR.Meatchicken thread turned into Fire Brands at Iowa!
It was one person making a bizarre statement. Overreacting is a thing now on forums, or didn't you know?Meatchicken thread turned into Fire Brands at Iowa!
Brands will take a group of kids and teach them to fight until their hearts no longer beat. For the near future the Hawks aren't going to beat a Cael run Penn State team and Ohio State has done a better job than Brands recruiting top end talent, but year in year out they will contend.Meatchicken thread turned into Fire Brands at Iowa!
I've predicted this for about a year... PSU, OSU and UM will all finish higher than Iowa next year. There is no question about that. My prediction is Brands gets the boot from Iowa. They will have accepted mediocrity if they don't make a move. Especially factoring in the Dresser decision at ISU and that soon to be pressure.
It's almost like the comments supporting Brands that followed that bizarre statement never existed. I expected Iowa fans to be happy with the response. Instead ...One mans comment
It was one person making a bizarre statement. Overreacting is a thing now on forums, or didn't you know?
Good point! I wonder how Amine vs Mahomes turns out (assuming Mahomes comes back from injury)? Older Massa I think is still around, but can't see him cracking that line-up. Pretty good depth!Myles Amine just took 4th @174 as a RSFR. He might crack that line-up.
Just an fyi...Iowa DOES wrestle Ohio State and Michigan in 2017-18..How many dual losses for Iowa next year ?
Penn State
Ohio St (if on the schedule)
Michigan (if on the schedule)
Oklahoma State (probably)
Amine is definitely the guy at the weight. Mahomes just couldn't stay healthy and may be done wrestling. Taylor Massa is definitely done wrestling.Good point! I wonder how Amine vs Mahomes turns out (assuming Mahomes comes back from injury)? Older Massa I think is still around, but can't see him cracking that line-up. Pretty good depth!
Some believe the true Iowa question for next year is can Iowa avoid a shutout against Penn State. I think the question of interest is can Iowa score an offensive point against Penn State.How many dual losses for Iowa next year ?
Penn State
Ohio St (if on the schedule)
Michigan (if on the schedule)
Oklahoma State (probably)
Some believe the true Iowa question for next year is can Iowa avoid a shutout against Penn State. I think the question of interest is can Iowa score an offensive point against Penn State.
Bizarre? I'm not sure about that. It was in response to how well UM is going to do while PSU (we are on this board) continues to do well. The fact is the success of these programs means the demise of others including one of the all time greats. I'm sorry your comments are 100% focused on the thread topics all the time. It is a message board, you know?One mans comment
It was one person making a bizarre statement. Overreacting is a thing now on forums, or didn't you know?
Michigan having an occasional good year does not equal the demise of Iowa.Bizarre? I'm not sure about that. It was in response to how well UM is going to do while PSU (we are on this board) continues to do well. The fact is the success of these programs means the demise of others including one of the all time greats. I'm sorry your comments are 100% focused on the thread topics all the time. It is a message board, you know?
I did the math. Added (shirts 2016 results + Beazley 2017) to Michigan's 2017 team score, and that puts them at 91 points, just behind Iowa. Then drop other teams for their seniors leaving, and that puts scUM 3rd -- without factoring how their guys would move up from other seniors leaving.
Not trying to diss Cenzo (or IMar for that matter), but Massa is good enough to win it all. Not saying he will, but he could.Nice! I took a stab too, fairly conservative:
Not trying to diss Cenzo (or IMar for that matter), but Massa is good enough to win it all. Not saying he will, but he could.
Not advocating for firing Brands at all. I like the guy's passion and think he's good for the sport.Brands will take a group of kids and teach them to fight until their hearts no longer beat. For the near future the Hawks aren't going to beat a Cael run Penn State team and Ohio State has done a better job than Brands recruiting top end talent, but year in year out they will contend.
Most true Hawk wrestling fans seem to understand that in Brands they have a solid Hawk guy leading their program. A few idiots within a fandom is just normal.
Is that coaching or is it facilities or is it lack of funding of a RTC or a combo? To me, the culprit at Iowa is funding and commitment on the part of the Iowa admin. Coaching is a very distant third to those other two. The only knock I'd have on brands is either his lack of vision or his lack of salesmanship in selling his vision to the large donors and admin. Probably the latter.Not advocating for firing Brands at all. I like the guy's passion and think he's good for the sport.
That said lets not blow smoke up our poster friends from HR's pants. All they have "contended" for lately is fourth or fifth place and next year they may not even be a top ten team.
Have to be honest and call it like it is.