A little rewind on Shubin.
Seems Mr. Shubin has been putting an awful lot of stock in the conclusions of the Freeh Report since early July 2012.
That's interesting.
Most likely, Shubin is "on-the-take" as a "conspirator of convenience" in this all too public Sandusky-Penn State illusion.
If you believed that the State of PA, with the help of the BOT (the Legal entity that controls all Penn State actions), promoted this public media "Story" of PSU criminality so that MONSTER paydays from "The Bank of PSU" could be obtained by anyone who would state that Sandusky "...made them feel uncomfortable..." or "... put his hand on my leg..." while in the car - then the "Shubin money grab" makes sense.
There seems to be plenty of evidence that one fact QUICKLY became common knowledge in supporting the OAG case and "Story" - that the "rules of law" could (and would) be "bent" in this case. Wouldn't you be pretty confident if you were a "witness" and ANYTHING you said in court would be protected by "plausible denial" when you were cross-examined? Wouldn't you "take liberties" (pushed in the right direction by a lawyer who would be making $$$MILLIONS$$$ by your appearance alone) with an "under oath testimony" when it was obvious no one could refute what you said? You knew that the STATE OF PA was out to convict at all costs - so what if those "liberties" with your testimony were really fabrications. NO "
MONSTER PREDITOR" deserves legal protection and certainly, Sandusky's "Nightmare Legal Team" did its best to make sure his defense was cooked.
My point here is SOMEONE throughout this matter has ALWAYS made $$$MONEY. Also, the
OPPORTUNITY FOR
CONTROLLING THE LEGAL PROCESS and thereby the
PAYMENT OUTCOME has always existed and has MANY suspicious elements to it..
For example....there has been
from the start an implied (or, as I believe VERBALLY stated in a "backroom" discussion -
tape recorder off, please) immunity from any form of prosecution from "repressed revelations" concerning Sandusky's interactions with "victims".
You just need to testify and then collect your $$$MONEY$$$ "...remember no one will know even your name - you are only a "victim #"..."
Additional to all of this is the Penn State BOT "vetting process". A process of claims payment which is
Better than Rocket Mortgage...."Make Claim...ask millions...press button...receive check".
And wouldn't it be nice if as the lawyer for these "victims" you personally knew
the only BOT individual who "oversaw" the claims settlement process?? If that were the case, how sure would you be a "check would be in the mail" for any claim...no matter how old, how absurd or how obviously fictitious was that claim. Confidence in the outcome (meaning NO RISK) is an essential factor in using knowingly "tainted" accusations to achieve income for an "in-the -know" lawyer.
So you see, a "back room guarantee of legal cooperation" was given to the LAWYERS involved here....how they handled it from there was a matter of personal "style".
Gee, I wish someone would see where these LAWYERS have donated $$MONEY$$ - money to what "charities" and to what political groups.
I'm betting that a full audit of their financials would show some interesting patterns of spending, gifts and donations
