http://www.mcall.com/sports/college...ootball-explosive-offense-20180913-story.html
an interesting read.
an interesting read.
yup it is, they talked about the correlation between winning and turnovers, I wonder what the correlation between explosive plays and winning?
Exact opposite of what we see 135 miles West of Beaver Stadium. The Meathead Model - where the solution to any issue, large or small, is - get a bigger hammer.He has folks...… lots of them.... to do all the "grunt work".
What IS key, is that CJF is intelligent enough to (to a large degree) break out of the mold of the traditional "book"..... and actually DO those things which make a positive impact (whether that be game-planning, decision-making, or how he runs a practice)
He may not be perfect - who is - but he is, relatively, near the very, very top in the profession in this regard - - - - - and that has benefitted PSU's Program significantly.
On the whole, the profession is moving in a direction where their is more intelligence and reason applied, to those areas that SHOULD have intelligence and reason applied - which is a very good thing
CJF, Urby, and several others - - - - - including the Coach coming in this week, from Kent St - - - - are working to break out of the bounds of stupidity - particularly wrt "game management" - that really shackled the profession for a long time (on the down side, when and if "more intelligent" becomes the norm, PSU will lose an advantage that they currently possess )
Duh!While I think analytics in general is good I think it can become a circular reasoning thing sometimes. Of course having fewer turnovers makes you way more likely to win but does that change how you play? Here's a surefire way to have fewer turnovers than your opponent, have your QB take a knee every play.
The teams play how they play and the ones that flub less on offense and do better on defense by creating turnovers is likely to win the game but the turnovers aren't the cause but rather are the effect.
Turnovers are in the causal pathway. It goes like this
Playing well -> More likely to have fewer turnovers than the opponent -> More likely to win.
You can't start with winning the turnover war, rather it's the result of playing well.