....how PSU's best wins don't look as good now.....blah, blah, blah.... the last several days consistently? Today they used it as justification for believing Iowa is better team???? But while making these statements about PSU's best wins to-date (Wisconsin and Auburn) not looking as good to diminish PSU's record to-date, they don't breathe a word that Iowa's 2 supposed awesome wins (Iowa State and Indiana) look even worse now than PSU's wins??? Not only that but they don't mention that Iowa struggled against 1-3 Kent for 3 Quarters and never pulled away from 1-3 Colorado State???? At this point of the season, PSU's overall record is far more impressive than Iowa's so why aren't they talking about Iowa's wins over supposed top competition in Indiana and Iowa State now look like shit??? BTW, why is it that a top-ranked team like Oklahoma can look like shit against bad-to-mediocre teams like Tulane, Nebraska and WVU, but Auburn is all of a sudden a bad team despite being 3-1 and ranked in all polls (the same cannot be said about either Iowa State or Indiana)? The constant bashing of PSU and attempting to diminish them is really telling when you look at this completely unbalanced negative analysis of PSU's Record to-date with no similar analysis of Iowa's record to date when the diminishing of PSU is being used to promote Iowa as the better team???