ADVERTISEMENT

As this Board creeps towards the possibility of becoming as ......

I'm a 1982 graduate of my beloved Penn Sate University. My wife graduated in 1983. My daughter in 2011 and my son is a Schreyer Honors Graduate in 2014. Went to my first game in 1968. Saw Reid, Smear, Campbell and crew. Got Andy Mater's autograph in the wrestling locker room after my first match. Have had season tix since 1985. The problem here my friend, is that many with your line of thinking are effin screwy. So, go troll yourself.
 
Calling out trolls isn't trolling.
There's only one problem with that statement. You call everyone that doesn't see things the same as you a troll. So if You don't see things like I do I'm going to call you out as a troll. I'll do you one better. Your a Penn live troll
 
I'm a 1982 graduate of my beloved Penn Sate University. My wife graduated in 1983. My daughter in 2011 and my son is a Schreyer Honors Graduate in 2014. Went to my first game in 1968. Saw Reid, Smear, Campbell and crew. Got Andy Mater's autograph in the wrestling locker room after my first match. Have had season tix since 1985. The problem here my friend, is that many with your line of thinking are effin screwy. So, go troll yourself.


Can't wait to see your 16th post. Which Penn Live troll are you?
 
I'm a 1982 graduate of my beloved Penn Sate University. My wife graduated in 1983. My daughter in 2011 and my son is a Schreyer Honors Graduate in 2014. Went to my first game in 1968. Saw Reid, Smear, Campbell and crew. Got Andy Mater's autograph in the wrestling locker room after my first match. Have had season tix since 1985. The problem here my friend, is that many with your line of thinking are effin screwy. So, go troll yourself.

Who are you addressing here?
 
Actually, it shows the jury believed McQueary. They convicted Sandusky on most of the charges in the victim 2 incident. The one that they didn't convict him on was because McQueary testified that he didn't actually see penetration. The acquital was because they thought not actually seeing penetration was enough reasonable doubt to acquit. It certainly isn't evidence that they didn't believe McQueary. They believed him when he stated he saw Sandusky assaulting the child (thus convicting Sandusky on four charges) and they believed him when he said he didn't see penetration (thus acquiting Sandusky on the involuntary deviate sexual intercourse charge).

Reality the jury in the JS trail was a bunch of wimps who only wanted to get the trial over. They have no idea, even today, as to JS's guilt. They deliberated less than 15 minutes on each of the charges. Talk about a runaway freight train. What they really wanted was to get away with miscarriage of justice which they accomplished. I have seen some simple murder trials that took longer.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pnnylion
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT