...and it could have been even better if we'd have won a few more of those tight ones we lost.
This year isn't over but...so looking forward to 2015-2016!!!
This year isn't over but...so looking forward to 2015-2016!!!
Since you've gone this far, give us a better idea of what you're talking about.Originally posted by dicemen99:
Some bads:
Moss' performance which is may really be trouble for 2016 if a rumor I heard this weekend from a VERY credible source comes to fruition.
Not to be a downer, but:Originally posted by pabison:
Here's how I see it:
125 - Conaway wrestled really well. He wrestled above seed and could have very well wrestled in the final if not for a tough loss to Gilman. He appears to be peaking at the right time.
133 - Jimmy is right there. I don't usually blame results on officiating, but he literally had two matches taken away by poor calls. The match Taylor should have never went to OT; the stalling call were way out of line with the rest of the tourney. Also the Stalemate call in the Richards match was HORRIBLE. Jimmy was in deep, improving hos position, had one leg under control, grabbed Richards' hip working toward getting the ankle on the second leg and the ref called a stalemate. Absolutely abysmal. The one thing Jimmy needs to do is keeo his intensity up and I still believe he can finish top 3 at nationals.
141 - Moss wrestled as expected. No change from the regular season.
149 - Beitz wrestled above seed. Lost a tough, close decision to Steiber; the only knock on this match is that Zach had it in the bag if he can just hold on to Hunter for 17 seconds. He seems to struggle with that when wrestling the better guys. The Pantaleo match was a little frustrating in that he never mixed his shots up, just kept grabbing for the ankle pick. The ref in that match again watched Pantaleo back-up for the entire 3rd period without a stalling call until the very end of the 3rd period...at that point why even call it? Zach has a chance to AA, especially if Hunter Steiber can't go at Nationals; having said this Zach is at the point where he can beat him head to head.
157 - Luke Frey gave us a couple of wins. Not bad for a last minute fill-in.
165 - Hammond was really the only one I was disappointed with. After getting pinned in a headscratcher by Walsh, he never seemed to recover mentally. Not sure what he was thinkng when he cut Moore in the place match; he gave that up way too easily.
174 - Matt Brown wrestled extremely well again. He has Evans' number. He just needs to figure out how to prevent/limit Kokesh's scrambling. Other than that, he will be the number 2 seed at Nationals, so he's in a great spot to get another shot at the title.
184 - McCutcheon wrestled out of his mind. I would have never expected that. He beat #9, #15 by major and #23. Lost a close one to Pfarr #14. I hope his injury is healed by Nationals.
197 - McIntosh. The CHAMP! wrestled great and avenged an earlier loss to Snyder. He should get the #2 seed at Nationals with that win, but #3 at worst.
285 - Jimmy would have wrestled to seed if not for the injury. Did not like his approach to the Telford match; he needs to win it with offense in the 1st period. If he lets it go to riding time, he has historically lost that battle everytime. Loved his approach to Adam Coon, came out aggressive early and got the TD, only problem is he got injured in the process. After that, he couldn't battle with Coon. No telling what would have happened without the injury. Again, I hope he's healed up for Nationals.
Again, the only one that disappointed me was Hammond. He just sort of fell apart after the Walsh match. I'm not sure how you can really be disappointed with the rest of the team when compared to expectations coming in.
Jimmy should watch McMullan for the "approach" to use on Telford. They (Jimmy & McMullan) seem to be similar physically...at least in comparison to Telford. McMullan seems to have written the book on beating Telford as he's done it 5 of 8 times over his career...all razor thin margins.Originally posted by pabison:
Here's how I see it:
285 - Jimmy would have wrestled to seed if not for the injury. Did not like his approach to the Telford match; he needs to win it with offense in the 1st period. If he lets it go to riding time, he has historically lost that battle everytime. Loved his approach to Adam Coon, came out aggressive early and got the TD, only problem is he got injured in the process. After that, he couldn't battle with Coon. No telling what would have happened without the injury. Again, I hope he's healed up for Nationals.
McMullan is more mobile, better on bottom and has a much bigger gas tank. Lawson would not be able to hold up wrestling like that.Originally posted by ptomaselli:
Jimmy should watch McMullan for the "approach" to use on Telford. They (Jimmy & McMullan) seem to be similar physically...at least in comparison to Telford. McMullan seems to have written the book on beating Telford as he's done it 5 of 8 times over his career...all razor thin margins.Originally posted by pabison:
Here's how I see it:
285 - Jimmy would have wrestled to seed if not for the injury. Did not like his approach to the Telford match; he needs to win it with offense in the 1st period. If he lets it go to riding time, he has historically lost that battle everytime. Loved his approach to Adam Coon, came out aggressive early and got the TD, only problem is he got injured in the process. After that, he couldn't battle with Coon. No telling what would have happened without the injury. Again, I hope he's healed up for Nationals.
I have no way of knowing if this is the case (and I'm certainly no expert) but outwardly if Cael has installed this gameplan it seems like Jimmy won't do it. Perhaps he doesn't believe in the strategy? Jimmy obviously has the physical tools to do it. To paraphrase something Cael said in his blog a while back, be the Mongoose (against the cobra).
Originally posted by Cosmos:
particularly from Ohio. Not 2015 but maybe 2016? Anyway, it appears the Illini's Martinez is one of those once-in-a-decade type wrestlers; cut in the same mold as Taylor, Ruth, Dake and Steiber. You know, the type who raises their game to an art. Just wondering when our next artist will arrive.
Originally posted by Tom McAndrew:
PSU guys that did about as expected:
1. Lawson - I was hoping he would do better, but he had a 7 seed, and Telford, at a 4 seed, is a bad matchup for him. He beat Jenson and Myers in the consolations, as I would have predicted, and lost to Coon in the consolation semis, which also would be expected. He was seeded 7th, and placed 6th -- pretty much on target.
I think they are "Once in a Decade" guys because wrestling is so defensive that the offensive guys stick out so much.Originally posted by CholleyVandine:
I did the math. That's five once-in-a-decade wrestlers all from the same decade.
Originally posted by Cosmos:
particularly from Ohio. Not 2015 but maybe 2016? Anyway, it appears the Illini's Martinez is one of those once-in-a-decade type wrestlers; cut in the same mold as Taylor, Ruth, Dake and Steiber. You know, the type who raises their game to an art. Just wondering when our next artist will arrive.
This post was edited on 3/9 4:39 PM by CholleyVandine
I've never said that cael can't coach. What I have said is that he hasn't coached yet.
Trolling AND lying. Anyone who is on here regularly knows you have ragged on Cael's coaching over and over again. You are at least good for a few good laughs. Other than that we justOriginally posted by jammenz:
Jefe, post a link or it never happened.
And what happened then?
Well, in Gooferville they say
that the Jammenz's small heart
grew three sizes that day.
McMullan and Lawson aren't that similar at all. As someone else noted, McMullan is smaller, quicker, and more mobile than Lawson.Originally posted by ptomaselli:
Jimmy should watch McMullan for the "approach" to use on Telford. They (Jimmy & McMullan) seem to be similar physically...at least in comparison to Telford. McMullan seems to have written the book on beating Telford as he's done it 5 of 8 times over his career...all razor thin margins.Originally posted by pabison:
Here's how I see it:
285 - Jimmy would have wrestled to seed if not for the injury. Did not like his approach to the Telford match; he needs to win it with offense in the 1st period. If he lets it go to riding time, he has historically lost that battle everytime. Loved his approach to Adam Coon, came out aggressive early and got the TD, only problem is he got injured in the process. After that, he couldn't battle with Coon. No telling what would have happened without the injury. Again, I hope he's healed up for Nationals.
I have no way of knowing if this is the case (and I'm certainly no expert) but outwardly if Cael has installed this gameplan it seems like Jimmy won't do it. Perhaps he doesn't believe in the strategy? Jimmy obviously has the physical tools to do it. To paraphrase something Cael said in his blog a while back, be the Mongoose (against the cobra).
So who exactly IS a great coach then???? JRob? How's he been doing lately? Last I looked Brand's underperforming team has been outdoing Minnesota's underperforming team for quite some time.Originally posted by jammenz:
I will say that I don't think that Brands is a great coach. His record is similar to Zalesky's and he won his titles as a result of a double class. Now you see his team underperforming.
Wait a minute. Double class, underperforming......hmmmmm.
I've never said Cael can't coach. I've only implied the hell out of it.Originally posted by jammenz:
I will say that I don't think that Brands is a great coach. His record is similar to Zalesky's and he won his titles as a result of a double class. Now you see his team underperforming.
Wait a minute. Double class, underperforming......hmmmmm.