If we win out we're between 5-7...likely 6
If we lose a second game we're not lower than 10 and likely in the 8-9 game
If we lose a second game we're not lower than 10 and likely in the 8-9 game
I'll take things that have zero chance of happening for $1000, Alex.Just wait until OSU loses to Indiana and then a 10-2 OSU team gets in over a 11-1 Penn State team because “OSU won the head to head match up with PSU”.
Talk about heads exploding.
Just win. That shuts up all arguments. We win out on the regular season, we will get our chance on the field in the playoffs. We either prove we belong or we don’t. There will be no more room to argue either way after that. If PSU wants the bad press to stop, all they need do is win.I give it to the SEC--they know what they want and they are retelentless and shameless in going after it. Even in the face of 8 conference games (vs 9 in B10), several of them not playing any opponents from the other major conferences, and bad losses by their top teams (Tenn vs Arkansas, Bama vs Vandy, and Ole Miss vs Kentucky and LSU), they want at least 5 if not 6 spots in the CFP.
Over the past few weeks but especially increased this past week, SEC folks and their media supporters have been playing up their conference while simultaneously dumping on the B10 but specifically PSU and Indiana. I get the criticism on Indiana which is in part on their lack of any historical success and their strength of schedule but outside of Michigan, they have beaten everyone by 14+ points and rank 5th in game control and 2nd in Average In-Game Win Probability (a data point that ESPN uses). Our schedule is 35th in the country, higher than Oregon, Texas, Indiana, BYU, Miami, and Notre Dame. We have one close loss to the #2 team. But I've heard Pat Forde, Finebaum, etc all crap on us and push other contenders. Has anyone been advocating for us? I mean that as an honest question.
I realize the obvious answer to that is the B10 should be but many of us feel the B10 will protect 2 programs at a greater intensity than the other members. And maybe they are advocating behind closed doors but the barrage of talking heads hyping up SEC's placement in the CFP will push those opinions into a perceived reality for many (perhaps, including those in CFP selection committee).
That win vs A&M should be completely canceled out by the NIU loss IMHO.Notre Dame's schedule is pretty weak this year. Obviously FSU being terrible hurt them but they also only have 8 games vs P4 opponents which is pathetic.
The win vs A&M is doing a ton of work for Notre Dame.
I don’t know that it matters much who is rooting for us.
The Big Ten will have four teams barring a colossal upset of Indiana by Purdue (after they lose to OSU) or Ohio State dropping their last two.
The SEC is essentially lobbying against the Acc and Big 12.
Notre Dame could lose to USC and slip out. But a 1-loss ND gets in above any non-CCG SEC team.
Agree, where are they?I give it to the SEC--they know what they want and they are retelentless and shameless in going after it. Even in the face of 8 conference games (vs 9 in B10), several of them not playing any opponents from the other major conferences, and bad losses by their top teams (Tenn vs Arkansas, Bama vs Vandy, and Ole Miss vs Kentucky and LSU), they want at least 5 if not 6 spots in the CFP.
Over the past few weeks but especially increased this past week, SEC folks and their media supporters have been playing up their conference while simultaneously dumping on the B10 but specifically PSU and Indiana. I get the criticism on Indiana which is in part on their lack of any historical success and their strength of schedule but outside of Michigan, they have beaten everyone by 14+ points and rank 5th in game control and 2nd in Average In-Game Win Probability (a data point that ESPN uses). Our schedule is 35th in the country, higher than Oregon, Texas, Indiana, BYU, Miami, and Notre Dame. We have one close loss to the #2 team. But I've heard Pat Forde, Finebaum, etc all crap on us and push other contenders. Has anyone been advocating for us? I mean that as an honest question.
I realize the obvious answer to that is the B10 should be but many of us feel the B10 will protect 2 programs at a greater intensity than the other members. And maybe they are advocating behind closed doors but the barrage of talking heads hyping up SEC's placement in the CFP will push those opinions into a perceived reality for many (perhaps, including those in CFP selection committee).
No chanceJust my hunch:
When ND beats Army, the Irish will jump over both PSU and the OSU-Indiana loser in the next AP poll.
Yep. We need to win out and have Ohio State take out Indiana. If Indiana wins we could be in trouble.Just wait until OSU loses to Indiana and then a 10-2 OSU team gets in over a 11-1 Penn State team because “OSU won the head to head match up with PSU”.
Talk about heads exploding.
I give it to the SEC--they know what they want and they are retelentless and shameless in going after it. Even in the face of 8 conference games (vs 9 in B10), several of them not playing any opponents from the other major conferences, and bad losses by their top teams (Tenn vs Arkansas, Bama vs Vandy, and Ole Miss vs Kentucky and LSU), they want at least 5 if not 6 spots in the CFP.
Over the past few weeks but especially increased this past week, SEC folks and their media supporters have been playing up their conference while simultaneously dumping on the B10 but specifically PSU and Indiana. I get the criticism on Indiana which is in part on their lack of any historical success and their strength of schedule but outside of Michigan, they have beaten everyone by 14+ points and rank 5th in game control and 2nd in Average In-Game Win Probability (a data point that ESPN uses). Our schedule is 35th in the country, higher than Oregon, Texas, Indiana, BYU, Miami, and Notre Dame. We have one close loss to the #2 team. But I've heard Pat Forde, Finebaum, etc all crap on us and push other contenders. Has anyone been advocating for us? I mean that as an honest question.
I realize the obvious answer to that is the B10 should be but many of us feel the B10 will protect 2 programs at a greater intensity than the other members. And maybe they are advocating behind closed doors but the barrage of talking heads hyping up SEC's placement in the CFP will push those opinions into a perceived reality for many (perhaps, including those in CFP selection committee).
Notre Dame is not high enough if they win out. They will stay right behind us and higher than a third place SEC team. Also unless the SEC ccg loser is an 11-2 Texas they are higher than a 3 loss SEC ccg loser. So they could be as high as #7 or drop to #8 if we are #7.To elaborate on my last point (no other team can squeeze in above PSU and the Big Ten CCG loser in the ranking)...
The most likely SEC scenarios are Texas/TAMU winner in the last week of the season plays against Bama or Georgia (depending on tie-breakers). It'd be 10-2 Bama and 10-2 Georgia...and either 11-1 Texas or 10-2 TAMU.
Whoever wins the SEC CCG is a shoe-in 2-seed.
The CCG loser then would either be a 10-3 Bama, 10-3 Georgia, 11-2 Texas or 10-3 TAMU. The only one who might push us lower would be 11-2 Texas if they lost close in the SEC CCG. Right?
Here's your likely seeds...
1. Big Ten champ
2. SEC champ
3. ACC champ
4. Big 12 champ (or Boise State, if the Big 12 champ stumbles to the finish line)
5. Big Ten CCG loser
6. Penn State (or SEC CCG loser)
7. SEC CCG loser (or Penn State)
8. 3rd place SEC (10-2 Bama or 10-2 Georgia. or 10-2 Texas or 10-2 Tennessee)
9. Notre Dame (if they win out, or 5th place SEC)
10. 4th place SEC (10-2 Bama or 10-2 Georgia. or 10-2 Texas or 10-2 Tennessee)
11. Indiana
12. Boise State (or the Big 12 champ if it stumbles to the finish line)
The other thing that's great about this set-up...is we don't have any conference rematches (PSU hosts Indiana, but they didn't play in season this year.)
I don't want to sound all CJF corny, but just win the next two games. After that bring the south to a northern winter dayI give it to the SEC--they know what they want and they are retelentless and shameless in going after it. Even in the face of 8 conference games (vs 9 in B10), several of them not playing any opponents from the other major conferences, and bad losses by their top teams (Tenn vs Arkansas, Bama vs Vandy, and Ole Miss vs Kentucky and LSU), they want at least 5 if not 6 spots in the CFP.
Over the past few weeks but especially increased this past week, SEC folks and their media supporters have been playing up their conference while simultaneously dumping on the B10 but specifically PSU and Indiana. I get the criticism on Indiana which is in part on their lack of any historical success and their strength of schedule but outside of Michigan, they have beaten everyone by 14+ points and rank 5th in game control and 2nd in Average In-Game Win Probability (a data point that ESPN uses). Our schedule is 35th in the country, higher than Oregon, Texas, Indiana, BYU, Miami, and Notre Dame. We have one close loss to the #2 team. But I've heard Pat Forde, Finebaum, etc all crap on us and push other contenders. Has anyone been advocating for us? I mean that as an honest question.
I realize the obvious answer to that is the B10 should be but many of us feel the B10 will protect 2 programs at a greater intensity than the other members. And maybe they are advocating behind closed doors but the barrage of talking heads hyping up SEC's placement in the CFP will push those opinions into a perceived reality for many (perhaps, including those in CFP selection committee).
Notre Dame is not high enough if they win out. They will stay right behind us and higher than a third place SEC team. Also unless the SEC ccg loser is an 11-2 Texas they are higher than a 3 loss SEC ccg loser. So they could be as high as #7 or drop to #8 if we are #7.