ADVERTISEMENT

Barkley and the Giants moving on

I think that’s probably better for the Eagles. Get the Gints instead of Dallas next week

I saw one of the worst effort plays ever peeking in on the game with about 13 min left in 4th. 3rd and 8 pass to Hockenson and he’s getting stopped 3 yards short if 30 for the Giants does anything more than tap him on the shoulder. He just stands there as his teammates are trying to gang tackle and Hockenson gets pushed almost to a 1st down. Vikings jumped offside and had to kick a FG anyway, but still.

 
  • Like
Reactions: creamery freak
I think that’s probably better for the Eagles. Get the Gints instead of Dallas next week
I may be in the minority but if I was the Eagles I'd rather play the Cowboys or Bucs (not convinced Dallas wins that game). Daboll is very underrated and will have a great game plan against the Eagles. Danny Dimes is way scarier than Dak Prescott right now IMO.
 
Vikings were a paper tiger if there ever was one - good win for the Giants but I don’t see an upset of the Beagles in their future.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gptakba
Vikings were a paper tiger if there ever was one - good win for the Giants but I don’t see an upset of the Beagles in their future.
Didn't the Giants backups give them a game in week 18? Or did Philly also play their backups?
 
I think that’s probably better for the Eagles. Get the Gints instead of Dallas next week

I saw one of the worst effort plays ever peeking in on the game with about 13 min left in 4th. 3rd and 8 pass to Hockenson and he’s getting stopped 3 yards short if 30 for the Giants does anything more than tap him on the shoulder. He just stands there as his teammates are trying to gang tackle and Hockenson gets pushed almost to a 1st down. Vikings jumped offside and had to kick a FG anyway, but still.

Maybe, however the Giants seem to be peeking at the most opportunistic time.
 
Most of them are "a long time ago" but they're 4th
well, I made the statement and "a long time ago" was within my memory as a teen or adult. In that time, both the Bulls and Blackhawks had dynasty runs. And both the Sox and Cubs won WS.

You have to also remember that my point of reference is CLE who has won a single championship since 1948.

you can throw Pittsburgh in there with dynasties for the Steelers and Penguins with a couple of WS wins in there for the Pirates as well. But I grew up on western PA so don't hate them. Pittsburgh is the only small market team that has thrived in the free-agent era.
 
well, I made the statement and "a long time ago" was within my memory as a teen or adult. In that time, both the Bulls and Blackhawks had dynasty runs. And both the Sox and Cubs won WS.

You have to also remember that my point of reference is CLE who has won a single championship since 1948.

you can throw Pittsburgh in there with dynasties for the Steelers and Penguins with a couple of WS wins in there for the Pirates as well. But I grew up on western PA so don't hate them. Pittsburgh is the only small market team that has thrived in the free-agent era.
Dallas winning 3 Super Bowls in 4 years wasn’t bad.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT