ADVERTISEMENT

Bonus in wrestlebacks

Chickenman Testa

Well-Known Member
Jan 4, 2003
26,160
47,692
1
A thread on TheMat about a team of 3rd placers beating a team of all champs led me to pose this question:

How come advancement points are halved in wrestlebacks, but bonus isn't? It seems disjointed to have the same reward system in a consolation process.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Flying_Tiger
I was wondering that question after the Ryan-OSU move. What if Nolf decided to lose his first round match and then just go on a rampant pinning spree to place third. How many points would he score versus just winning.
 
I was wondering that question after the Ryan-OSU move. What if Nolf decided to lose his first round match and then just go on a rampant pinning spree to place third. How many points would he score versus just winning.

Not as many as he could by doing the same thing and finishing first. Here are the max points for each without a pigtail, which a seeded wrestler never gets anyway.

1st 16 placement plus 4 advancement plus 10 bonus for 5 pins equals 30 points.

3rd 10 plus 3.5 advancement plus 14 bonus for 7 pins equals
27.5 points.
 
I was wondering that question after the Ryan-OSU move. What if Nolf decided to lose his first round match and then just go on a rampant pinning spree to place third. How many points would he score versus just winning.
Tom and Jake must have had a very interesting father/son conversation after that move. Sorry son, you have to default at the beginning of the match since you can't beat Murphy.

What coach tells an athlete you have no chance of winning, way to instill confidence. Of course they did win the tournament...very low class move and sends the wrong message on so many levels.
 
On this note, was there ever a clear explanation from Tom Ryan re. this move... sorry if I missed it...it was a perplexing move at best.
 
  • Like
Reactions: diggerpup
Tom Ryan having Jake take a first round MF to exploit the wrestlebacks reminded me of Buttermaker telling the reluctant Rudy Stein to lean in and get hit by the pitch. On the one hand maybe the smart move; on the other hand, soulless.
 
Tom Ryan having Jake take a first round MF to exploit the wrestlebacks reminded me of Buttermaker telling the reluctant Rudy Stein to lean in and get hit by the pitch. On the one hand maybe the smart move; on the other hand, soulless.
At least with Buttermaker, if the ball was in the strikezone it was up to the Umpire to call it a strike. Ryan told his son, you can't win, not like he was facing Nolf.
 
At least with Buttermaker, if the ball was in the strikezone it was up to the Umpire to call it a strike. Ryan told his son, you can't win, not like he was facing Nolf.
Yeah there are a few differences but ultimately it comes down to an adult ruining youth sports. Don't want to implicate Jake because I'll assume he was following orders (also makes me wonder whether Tom would've made that request of anyone who wasn't his son) but Rudy's acquiescence was also the braver act ("But it'll hurt." "You want to win the game, don't you?").
 
The worst thing about the whole situation is it paid off in the end to a degree... wasn't the deciding factor of course but did help young Ryan win with bonus and earn some points.. would have been nice to see it back fire and go 0-2 and out...
 
  • Like
Reactions: diggerpup
The worst thing about the whole situation is it paid off in the end to a degree... wasn't the deciding factor of course but did help young Ryan win with bonus and earn some points.. would have been nice to see it back fire and go 0-2 and out...

OTOH it may have cost Ryan a spot in NCAAs.
 
On this note, was there ever a clear explanation from Tom Ryan re. this move... sorry if I missed it...it was a perplexing move at best.

Don't think there's anything perplexing about it

Would be nice to see Ryan asked about it though - I would watch that answer
 
  • Like
Reactions: diggerpup
Not as many as he could by doing the same thing and finishing first. Here are the max points for each without a pigtail, which a seeded wrestler never gets anyway.

1st 16 placement plus 4 advancement plus 10 bonus for 5 pins equals 30 points.

3rd 10 plus 3.5 advancement plus 14 bonus for 7 pins equals
27.5 points.

it's only 27 points. You don't get .5 for winning the 3rd place match
 
Not as many as he could by doing the same thing and finishing first.

1st ... plus 10 bonus for 5 pins equals ...

3rd ... plus 14 bonus for 7 pins equals ...
Yes, but the idea was not to seek the theoretical max possible points. The idea was that, as a practical matter, pins and bonus would be more likely in the consolation bracket than in the winners' bracket.
 
Last edited:
I am struggling with this concept on defaulting if Jake was ready to go. What is the benefit, still don't see the benefit on being in wrestlebacks, if he went and wrestled but lost he would still be there but if somehow he won wouldn't it be more points to be in the championship bracket for as long as possible. Once again just not getting the perceived benefit in defaulting
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ankle Pick
Who is the last guy to achieve 5 straight pins and 30 points for their team at nationals?
I'll take a shot but it would be the only bullet in my barrel as he is the only one I know to have done it. Bruce Kinseth from Iowa in 1979 I believe. Pinned his way through the Big Tens and the NCAA's. Not sure if the scoring was the same back then so it might not have been 30 points.
 
A thread on TheMat about a team of 3rd placers beating a team of all champs led me to pose this question:

How come advancement points are halved in wrestlebacks, but bonus isn't? It seems disjointed to have the same reward system in a consolation process.
CT - If that did happen then there definitely would be some scoring changes but I can't believe that I never noticed that before or the NCAA for that matter. All I can say is WOW what a clusterf**k if something like that ever happened.

Say one team gets 4 champs and 2 seconds but another team outscores them with 3 champs and 3 thirds. That would be so wrong in my opinion.
 
I am struggling with this concept on defaulting if Jake was ready to go. What is the benefit, still don't see the benefit on being in wrestlebacks, if he went and wrestled but lost he would still be there but if somehow he won wouldn't it be more points to be in the championship bracket for as long as possible. Once again just not getting the perceived benefit in defaulting

I think it is real sad Tom Ryan would do this! And just as bad how no one is really talking about it. Some people have their opinions how Tom"holds" certain wrestlers out of duals. Funny how Jake "lost" his spot when they dualed PSU and Ryan sent out a back up to get hammered by Nolf. But of course when it's Big 10's Jake is the starter again.

Anyway no doubt Ryan knew/thought his kid would lose his 1st round match and in the process did not want him spent for his following consi match. Therefore going 0-2. So Tom did the chickenshit thing and had him forfeit his first match to hope his son could make a run on the bottom of the bracket.

It was satisfying seeing his son losing in OT and eliminated to someone from another institution who did NOT try and play the system. Also great to see Jake not get a wild card to NCAA's. This is not a personal attack on his son at all. It is just if his son is not injured there is NO reason to skip out on your first match. I also wish he would answer why he did it. Though really we all know why!

Think about it. Just what if this became a trend to guys overmatched in their first round match up? And they decided oh screw it i am going to lose anyway so i just gonna conserve my energy and forfeit out of my first match.
 
I am struggling with this concept on defaulting if Jake was ready to go. What is the benefit, still don't see the benefit on being in wrestlebacks, if he went and wrestled but lost he would still be there but if somehow he won wouldn't it be more points to be in the championship bracket for as long as possible. Once again just not getting the perceived benefit in defaulting

I agree.. I know there are much bigger and more important things to worry about - but just cant see what O$U was thinking - and how it would benefit both the wrestler and the team. - guess it did somehow since they won the team title - just too dense to understand the overall strategy I guess.
 
Not as many as he could by doing the same thing and finishing first. Here are the max points for each without a pigtail, which a seeded wrestler never gets anyway.

1st 16 placement plus 4 advancement plus 10 bonus for 5 pins equals 30 points.

3rd 10 plus 3.5 advancement plus 14 bonus for 7 pins equals
27.5 points.
Too close of a differential, in my opinion, you could possibly have the champ, with the tougher path, get a major and few decisions, score less points, than the guy finishing 3rd, with the easier path and a bunch pins.
 
where are tOSU folks to tell us what happened? Surely someone by now has asked the question to the head coach (or wrestler)? Must be big secret... Didn't hear T-Row or FRL discuss it (don't think I missed it)...
 
Yes, but the idea was not to seek the theoretical max possible points. The idea was that, as a practical matter, pins and bonus would be more likely in the consolation bracket than in the winners' bracket.
I wouldn't jump to that conclusion.

Last year, there were 101 MD's in the tournament. 60 of them occurred on the championship side, 41 in consies.
 
I wouldn't jump to that conclusion.

Last year, there were 101 MD's in the tournament. 60 of them occurred on the championship side, 41 in consies.
Good point.

The too-clever trick works best for a super stud. The question was about Nolf losing on purpose. But Nolf is not a good candidate because Nolf has a chance to make the finals, so the cost of losing on purpose is too high. To me, the too-clever trick actually makes sense for only one type of wrestler: a super stud in a same side of the bracket as an unbeatable ultra stud.
 
Yes, but the idea was not to seek the theoretical max possible points. The idea was that, as a practical matter, pins and bonus would be more likely in the consolation bracket than in the winners' bracket.
That isn't the case though. The guys in the consi bracket are there because they usually slug out the 7-5 win. If they were bonus machines, they would still be in the winner's bracket.
 
I've always questioned the +2 for medical forfeits. Seems excessive and could influence a close team race.
 
That isn't the case though. The guys in the consi bracket are there because they usually slug out the 7-5 win. If they were bonus machines, they would still be in the winner's bracket.
You're right. Bonus is more likely for a super stud who gets to consis prematurely, compared to that same super stud if he stays in the winner's bracket as long as possible. Bonus is not more likely for regular joes who get to consis at the deserved time, compared to the better wrestlers in the winner's bracket.
 
I've always questioned the +2 for medical forfeits. Seems excessive and could influence a close team race.

100%. No way the pinacle of the sport a fall should be the same as no match happening at all.
 
I've always questioned the +2 for medical forfeits. Seems excessive and could influence a close team race.
Gamesmanshipwise, a medical forfeit now cannot be used to deprive your opponent of pinfall points. If medical forfeits were worth less than a pin, then a guy would be able to medical forfeit to avoid a pin. In this past Big 10 tournament, when PSU was furiously trying to come back, if MFFs were worth less than pins, then tOSU wrestlers, in head to head matches, would have had the option to slow PSU down by choosing to medical forfeit. And Ryan would have known and used it if it woulda helped him. And that would not be fun to watch.
 
Last edited:
I am struggling with this concept on defaulting if Jake was ready to go. What is the benefit, still don't see the benefit on being in wrestlebacks, if he went and wrestled but lost he would still be there but if somehow he won wouldn't it be more points to be in the championship bracket for as long as possible. Once again just not getting the perceived benefit in defaulting
I haven't read all the posts on this, so maybe someone else will make the same point. I agree with you, that I don't see a benefit of defaulting, UNLESS Ryan was hurt and his Dad, expecting him to lose to Murphy anyway, wanted him to be as healthy as possible in the consys with the hope of qualifying for NCAA's.
 
Good point.

The too-clever trick works best for a super stud. The question was about Nolf losing on purpose. But Nolf is not a good candidate because Nolf has a chance to make the finals, so the cost of losing on purpose is too high. To me, the too-clever trick actually makes sense for only one type of wrestler: a super stud in a same side of the bracket as an unbeatable ultra stud.
AJ Schopp would be an example of that a couple of years ago. He lost first round and then scored 4 falls in consys to place 3rd. Could very well have scored more points by losing 1st round than if he had gotten to semis.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dogwelder
... if MFFs were worth less than pins, then tOSU wrestlers, in head to head matches, would have had the option to slow PSU down by choosing to medical forfeit. And Ryan would have known and used it if it woulda helped him. And that would not be fun to watch.
It would be even worse in dual meets. The MFF would be every team's George Carpenter. Teams would be MFF'ing to Zain left and right. Very bad for entertainment and the John Wayne way.
 
... To me, the too-clever trick actually makes sense for only one type of wrestler: a super stud in a same side of the bracket as an unbeatable ultra stud.
I think Nick Nevills is on Snyder's side of the bracket. If Snyder really is unbeatable, and if Snyder can never get injured before Nick meets him in the winner's bracket, then Nick, being a pinner, would be a candidate for the trick. I said "if"; I would never recommend the trick because it is wimpy and oblique and Un-American. [Rulon Gardner proved that no one is unbeatable]
 
Last edited:
that could be fixed pretty simple. if you medical forfeit out of your first match, the you are out of the tournament. wouldn't that solve the problem?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dogwelder
100%. No way the pinacle of the sport a fall should be the same as no match happening at all.
It's 100% necessary, though. You can't give a competitor the opportunity to limit your potential team scoring by MFing.

It's similar in reasoning to why you cannot have different scoring for an intentional release in a bout - if you awarded no escape point for an intentional release, the top guy can essentially rob the bottom guy of a chance to score a legitimate point.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dogwelder
I wouldn't jump to that conclusion.

Last year, there were 101 MD's in the tournament. 60 of them occurred on the championship side, 41 in consies.
I believe there were 94 Majors in 2016. Looking at all bonus point wins, 53% were in the Championship bracket, 47% in Wrestle-backs. It's just one year, however that's really close. There are the same number of bouts in both brackets (32 in championship, 32 in wrestle-backs).
 
I haven't read all the posts on this, so maybe someone else will make the same point. I agree with you, that I don't see a benefit of defaulting, UNLESS Ryan was hurt and his Dad, expecting him to lose to Murphy anyway, wanted him to be as healthy as possible in the consys with the hope of qualifying for NCAA's.

The only benefit of a fake Injury Default versus wrestling the entire match and losing is the energy you conserve for the Consi Bracket matches. Effectively, Ryan was 100% fresh versus an opponent that had wrestled a full match earlier in his first Consi Bracket match.
 
It would be even worse in dual meets. The MFF would be every team's George Carpenter. Teams would be MFF'ing to Zain left and right. Very bad for entertainment and the John Wayne way.

Must admit that is a legitimate argument for the +2 med forfeit. Still don't like it but the alternative could be worse because I'm sure there will be coaches that will game the system.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dogwelder
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT