Anyone who quotes Palin is an idiot.Sarah Palin has a phrase for this......"YOU BETCHA"!
Anyone who quotes Palin is an idiot.Sarah Palin has a phrase for this......"YOU BETCHA"!
Casey. He lives in marshcreek. I think he gives financial advice. He used to publish a very public Penn State football newsletter with his name on it. He hated Tiger Woods and declined Lubrano's very cordial invitation to lunch to discuss things.
Casey who? The other info isn't anything new.
Nothing to spin. The dissidents got nothing more than what was being offered from day one. The Joebots foolishly celebrate the release of documents they'll never set eyes on and for which the dissidents can't disclose the contents of publicly. The court affirms confidentiality which is clearly a big win for the university and a big loss for the Joebots.
Anyone who quotes Palin is an idiot.
There was a hint provided on the previous page.
I thought it was interesting that CR's response was basically, well fine, they got what you wanted but they won't be able to talk about what's in there.
Casey who? The other info isn't anything new.
Can't we stop with the cute hints? If he outed himself and some of us missed it, then why not just repeat the information?
The simple realizations are this:
1. cr66 is worried by yesterday's news because it indicates that his friends with "pedigree" cannot do what they want to put their interests above all.
2. michidiot is worried by yesterday's news because it likely will benefit the Paternos, of whom he is consumed with deep hatred.
The moderators at times have protected him so I don't think it is a great idea to just post his name. I had one of my own posts nuked a couple days ago for blasting him. The hints are there. It really isn't too tough to figure out.
I've criticized actions of other BoT members before. Maybe you've missed those points. I'm not going to go off on that tangent here, listing all those actions I've critcized, given that this is tangential to this thread's topic.
Anyway, a re-iteration of my main point. People have gotten the "review of Freeh documents" which they have been clamoring for. I do not view this as a negative. I view this as a "put up or shut up time, in terms of showing tangible proof" opportunity.
This "review of Freeh documents" needs to show some tangible proof that either (1) the Freeh Report's conclusions were predetermined, or (2) the Freeh Report manufactured some of the evidence used to make his conclusions. If neither (1) or (2) happen, it will be time for a significant number of "Paterno Loyalists" to admit they were wrong.
Gotcha.Not sure about the degree but he does have a "Way" named after him in downtown State College.
"substantiate" = to establish via competent evidence.
Unless one is saying that the various exhibits in the Freeh Report were doctored or made up, the Freeh Report already substantiated its conclusions.
Gotcha.
Thanks for that, I needed a good laugh this morning.
Freeh's so called "reasonable conclusions" are not even remotely supported by the evidence he provided in his report. If they had been, there wouldn't even be a need for his source materials. However, since his firm wrote a sham of a report that everyone with an ounce of intelligence can see is not based in facts, he created this mess himself. I don't even refer to his "reasonable conclusions" as such anymore. The Freeh findings are opinions, nothing more. And to think that those opinions were not influenced (either intentionally or unintentionally) by those signing Freeh's $8.5M paycheck, is naive.
Pretty sure it isn't the Way Fruit Farm out on 550.Calder Way? I can't think of any other ways off the top of my head, even though I'm sure there are more.
Calder Way? I can't think of any other ways off the top of my head, even though I'm sure there are more.
I thought it was interesting that CR's response was basically, well fine, they got what you wanted but they won't be able to talk about what's in there.
What burns my ass is at one point Emmert claimed Freeh DID have subpoena power and implied Freeh's work was a real investigation. I know Emmert is a dumbass but he must have been fooled by the "Judge Freeh" label.
A lot will depend on "confidentiality". If it's just names and the like, then that's one thing. If it is *everything* PSU determines is "confidential" then it would be difficult for the trustees to issue any kind of report on the Freeh Report. My guess is that it will be the former. Can't identify anyone but can talk about what is in there.
Pretty sure it isn't the Way Fruit Farm out on 550.
Can get a list of interviewee names and then ask them what they said.
Anyone who quotes Palin is an idiot.
You and your boys are going down CR66. I'd be looking at countries where they don't have an extradition agreement with the US if I was one of your buddies. Lubrano and the good BOT are going to rip this thing wide openNothing to spin. The dissidents got nothing more than what was being offered from day one. The Joebots foolishly celebrate the release of documents they'll never set eyes on and for which the dissidents can't disclose the contents of publicly. The court affirms confidentiality which is clearly a big win for the university and a big loss for the Joebots.
Great stache Lubrano but please do away with the red. Too much like ahia state
no one is going down with exception of the defendants, maybe.
This NEEDS to happen. The TRUTH must come out!Lubrano, don't let us down man. Find a way to get these out in the open where the world can see how Joe was railroaded by the BOT and Freeh. We're counting on you
I want Erickson's name off of the building.