I don't think the lawsuit, relative to racism, has any merit. I do believe this is a massive PR hit to the NFL.
But sports has been about competition. So my line of reasoning is:
- You compete so you put the best people you can afford out there to win.
- Winning is directly related to their income, all of them.
- As such, race and gender is not an issue based on the best person available theory.
- If race is an issue, why are 80% of players black? Does that need to be adjusted? Aside from owners, these are the highest-paid people in the NFL.
- If race is to be held in higher regard than merit, do we then legislate that 51% of players need to be female and 5% of players need to be asian? Perhaps another 8% need to be gay?
Is business not also competition? Does it serve society to have less qualified businesses because they have to staff to meet race/gender quotas? What makes competition in football any different than working for one of 20 heating/cooling companies in the city? I guess the point is, where does it end?