You are correct. My bad. They pick both straight up and against the spread. Only 2 of them picked us to lose straight up.maybe thats with the points
Probably like Iowa with the points. Vegas is pretty good at figuring out what points will make folks bet both ways. I'm not reading that as expecting PSU to lose. Although it may impact the "looks test." ;-)
If there's 7-10 of them, that actually seems realistic to me. This PSU team v. that Iowa team playing a night game in Kinnick. 2 out of 7 or 10 times, It's reasonable to expect Iowa would win.You are correct. My bad. They pick both straight up and against the spread. Only 2 of them picked us to lose straight up.
"expert picks" is a selection on the drop down on their CF page.Where did you find that Mt. Nittany? I just checked the CBS Sports SFB site, and I could not find it.
You are correct. My bad. They pick both straight up and against the spread. Only 2 of them picked us to lose straight up.
I live in Cedar Rapids Iowa and most the local radio stations and many of the Hawkeye fans are predicting the upset.
You are correct. My bad. They pick both straight up and against the spread. Only 2 of them picked us to lose straight up.
I was there 25+ years ago. It's on my radar to go again.Liex: Ever been to Lake Okoboji in the summer? It's great boating over to Arnolds Park at night.
Too bad we didn't have a tougher test at home before going to Iowa. Some MAC teams provide a good test but not Akron, at least this year. Pitt might normally be a good test but they lost too much on the OL, new QB, coaching change, and suspensions.
Pretty much guaranteed...I hope everyone picks Iowa....we already know Mushmouf will.....
Too bad we couldn't pick who the experts will pick...I bet we would get more right than they get picking the games.Pretty much guaranteed...
that could happenIf I had to make a prediction on hope and heart, it would be Johnson having 6+ catches for over 100 yards.
I think it comes down to our D. If we don't stop them from getting first downs and let them drive like Pitt did, they're good enough to put the ball in the end zone. With them eating clock and keeping our O off the field, they could not only stay in the game but win. I think we can score enough to win the game, but we have to be tighter on D than we were against Pitt.that could happen
The key IMO is McSorely having a good game, which MOSTLY means making the right choices of where to go with the ball, when to run it himself, and basic accuracy. If he plays well, there is just no way for almost any college team to stop the PSU offense. Too many playmakers.
So if McSorely plays well, what is the path to victory for Iowa?? Or even to keep it close? It would have to be turnovers, a big edge in special teams play, and an unexpectedly good performance by the Iowa offense. Improbable that happens.
Well, it's possible. But, what's the chance that their ball control offense could outscore the PSU big play offense? They would have to execute almost perfectly to score a lot of points: PSU is bound to hit big plays even with a time of possession deficit.I think it comes down to our D. If we don't stop them from getting first downs and let them drive like Pitt did, they're good enough to put the ball in the end zone. With them eating clock and keeping our O off the field, they could not only stay in the game but win. I think we can score enough to win the game, but we have to be tighter on D than we were against Pitt.
Think about if Pitt would have scored TD's....would have been a completely different game. We still would have won, but it could have been a whole different scenario. We have to get some three and outs or six and outs on defense or it could be a really close game. And close games always come down to a turnover or an ill timed three and out by the offense.Well, it's possible. But, what's the chance that their ball control offense could outscore the PSU big play offense? They would have to execute almost perfectly to score a lot of points: PSU is bound to hit big plays even with a time of possession deficit.
Just my opinion, but as I think this through, an Iowa win would be fluky.
I wonder who Mushmouf would pick if his job depended on it.Pretty much guaranteed...
Think about if Pitt would have scored TD's....would have been a completely different game. We still would have won, but it could have been a whole different scenario. We have to get some three and outs or six and outs on defense or it could be a really close game. And close games always come down to a turnover or an ill timed three and out by the offense.
Oh, I think we will win and I would be thrilled if it was like last year's game, but I think it will be close. I've got my blood pressure pills ready (or alcohol) and I'm ready for a close game. We had some close ones last year and I don't see us rolling through every game this year, so let the conference games begin.Yeah, I get your point, and we'll see -- it may be a tight game which Iowa could find a way to win.
But a Pitt or Iowa just doesn't score touchdowns so easily. They generally need long drives with no mistakes. This PSU offense can score at any time and IMO will put up 30+ points on Iowa. Can they really match that? and I think you're too pessimistic about the PSU defense, and our special teams look as strong as I can recall for a PSU team. No real weaknesses.
Carry on if you like. I feel confident about this one.
History-
All time wins: PSU 14 - IA 12
13 Games in Iowa City
13 Games in State College
Both teams average better on the road.
Total point scored in Iowa City: IA (206) - PSU (320)
Total points scored in State College: IA (228) - PSU (315)
Combined: IA (434) - PSU (635)
9 games have ended within a single score to tie. (35%)
Only 3 of those 9 were in Iowa City.
Each team holds 1 shutout: 31-0 PSU (1993) 19-0 IA (1930) [both held in Iowa City]
Penn State currently has a 3 game win streak, their best is 5. Iowa also had 5.
What does this mean? Nothing.
One of those local radio guys had Iowa winning 9-10....
Sure, it's possible, not very likely that PSU will be held to 9 points.
that could happen
The key IMO is McSorely having a good game, which MOSTLY means making the right choices of where to go with the ball, when to run it himself, and basic accuracy. If he plays well, there is just no way for almost any college team to stop the PSU offense. Too many playmakers.
So if McSorely plays well, what is the path to victory for Iowa?? Or even to keep it close? It would have to be turnovers, a big edge in special teams play, and an unexpectedly good performance by the Iowa offense. Improbable that happens.
But Pitt didn't score TDs. Well one late.Think about if Pitt would have scored TD's....would have been a completely different game. We still would have won, but it could have been a whole different scenario. We have to get some three and outs or six and outs on defense or it could be a really close game. And close games always come down to a turnover or an ill timed three and out by the offense.
Think about if Pitt would have scored TD's....would have been a completely different game. We still would have won, but it could have been a whole different scenario. We have to get some three and outs or six and outs on defense or it could be a really close game. And close games always come down to a turnover or an ill timed three and out by the offense.
I think it comes down to our D. If we don't stop them from getting first downs and let them drive like Pitt did, they're good enough to put the ball in the end zone. With them eating clock and keeping our O off the field, they could not only stay in the game but win. I think we can score enough to win the game, but we have to be tighter on D than we were against Pitt.
Think about it, if we weren't ahead 14 pts almost immediately, we might have played differently as well.