I'll go Cenzo 7-6
And Medbery 5-2. 1-1 for the good guys in much anticipated measuring stick matchups. Who ya got?
Yuge for seeding if Nick can beat Medbery and get out of the 4/5 slot (Sasquatch dropping from 4th due to today's loss).
Sure, it would be a great bump. But just avoiding 6-9 seed works for me. If Nick makes the semis, PSU is in great shape.
Yuge for seeding if Nick can beat Medbery and get out of the 4/5 slot (Sasquatch dropping from 4th due to today's loss).
Either but not both. Because Kasper will likely pass Nick if he sweeps Walz. Maybe even if Nick sweeps Medbery, because Nick will still likely have 2 losses to Snyder, and Kasper has only 1 loss this year (coincidentally, pinned by Medbery's backup).Then we should be big fans of Duke Blueberries next Sunday (or March 4th). It may turn out to be Nevills only path to #3.
Either but not both. Because Kasper will likely pass Nick if he sweeps Walz. Maybe even if Nick sweeps Medbery, because Nick will still likely have 2 losses to Snyder, and Kasper has only 1 loss this year (coincidentally, pinned by Medbery's backup).
Then again, if Kasper sweeps Walz and Nick sweeps Medbery, then they'll be the 2 and 3 seeds at nationals. One of them would get Sasquatch in the quarters, the other Schafer. Medbery and Walz would battle in the quarters for the right to lose to Snyder in the semis. That might be our dream scenario.
Let's start by saying: seeding committees do goofy things. Every year. Example: Nolf #3 behind Gantt.Not that I was implying a need for a Kasper sweep of Walz, but let's say if he did...You would seed Kasper (with a bad loss on his record) higher than Nevills if the latter's only losses -- no matter the number -- were to Snyder and Medbery (assuming Medbery loses to no one other than Snyder)?
In case that wasn't clear, let's assume Snyder and Medbery stay #1 and #2, Nick's only loss(es) are to those two guys, and Kasper sweeps Walz....I would seed Nevills #3, Kasper #4, Walz #5, Quatch #6, etc. No?
Let's start by saying: seeding committees do goofy things. Every year. Example: Nolf #3 behind Gantt.
I think if Kasper sweeps, the seeders will look at his 2 very good wins (over Walz) and consider his loss an aberration. Nick's overall schedule would be better, but (unless he splits with Medbery) his best win would be Kroells, who is not as good a win as Walz.
The seeders could also decide to separate Kasper and Walz until the finals.
Let's start by saying: seeding committees do goofy things. Every year. Example: Nolf #3 behind Gantt.
I think if Kasper sweeps, the seeders will look at his 2 very good wins (over Walz) and consider his loss an aberration. Nick's overall schedule would be better, but (unless he splits with Medbery) his best win would be Kroells, who is not as good a win as Walz.
The seeders could also decide to separate Kasper and Walz until the finals.
Pretty sure they use a similar criteria to selecting the at-large wrestlers. In priority order...Good points on the committee, and I would hope that strength of schedule played a role...Very likely a moot hypothetical, though, as I doubt Walz loses to him twice. Lightning striking once would make things very interesting, however.
Sure, it would be a great bump. But just avoiding 6-9 seed works for me. If Nick makes the semis, PSU is in great shape.
Count me with those who will not be in the least bit surprised if NN wins this match. I say about 50/50. VJ I would give more of a 30% chance. Jordan is very good at winning tight matches.
6 points for Wisconsin, hope I'm wrong