ADVERTISEMENT

Collegian article re: alleged Starocci misconduct

“Do you think a defense attorney would use an alleged victim still working at the same place of work that the alleged assaults occurred in for several months, and introduce proof that there’s a high likelihood similar income could be found elsewhere as evidence?”

Yes, I do.
Yes, I agree. Attorneys use a lot of dirty tactics to try to impugn witnesses. I'm saying it's in bad faith and I was showing how it's a bad argument.
 
  • Like
Reactions: vhsalum
My gut tells me, there is no way in hell Cael didn't address this up the chain of command. If he didn't, I have no words after what this university has been through. Furthermore, I put zero credence in what the Daily Collegian prints. I'll wait for facts. I also don't believe Beau's words whatsoever regarding the police not being able to get in touch with Carter for 6 months. That isn't remotely believable.
Some of the older guys posting here might remember the hit job that Woodward and Bernstein did on Nixon back in the Watergate era. After that happened, every journalism major had dreams of becoming an investigative reporter and scoring a big win by digging up dirt on well known public figures and organizations. The tone of the Collegian article makes me wonder if the author is attempting to accomplish the same.
 
If you associate being sexually assaulted as equal to being falsely accused of sexual assualt I don't know what to tell you.

Those posts I brought up were not "treating as innocent until proven guilty" they were outright dismissive of Beau and the potential seriousness of sexual assault allegations. This is something that, since Beau's post came out, I have been saying could be a major deal. People just brushing off allegations like these is what happened back in the day with Football and if it is proven to have happened here with the program here, it could end the greatest college sports dynasty of the 21st century. When someone brings up SA or potential SA committed by an athlete that people like, their first response is to try and dismiss it because they don't want it to be true. I am not saying people should have burned Carter at the stake once the first post came out, I am saying they should be a little slower to call out Beau or disregard it.
I said I equally don’t want my kid accused falsely. You’re not going to take steps to corner with “wow geez if you think they’re equal crimes you do you” stuff to put me on defensive.
 
  • Like
Reactions: paradox1984
Yes, I agree. Attorneys use a lot of dirty tactics to try to impugn witnesses. I'm saying it's in bad faith and I was showing how it's a bad argument.
Retired attorney here. It’s not a dirty trick. It’s your job as a defense attorney. It may not be pretty, and it may not seem fair to the victim, but if that’s all you’ve got you’re obligated to go there.
 
To echo Bordeaux: back when I was coaching varsity with my stepdad I had heard rumblings of Carter having been accused of bullying while at Prep. He and a teammate supposedly bullied an underclassman to the point where the kid wound up quitting the sport all together. The kid who was allegedly bullied was a good wrestler too, multiple time PJW state qualifier and place winner. I never heard much else about it so I chalked it up to hearsay.

If these allegations prove true, I know there will be a lot of local youth wrestlers and parents who will be heartbroken because so many of them look up to him. Carter ran a clinic nearby a few years ago and several of my wrestlers were falling over themselves trying to get in the door because they were so excited.

The SA stuff is troubling to say the least. I’ve known many women who have their own SA stories and it’s sad that they had to endure that type of trauma. Even if it amounts to nothing, that specter will be following him for the rest of his life.
 
I said I equally don’t want my kid accused falsely. You’re not going to take steps to corner with “wow geez if you think they’re equal crimes you do you” stuff to put me on defensive.
If your desire not to have them falsely accused equals your desire for them not to be sexually assaulted, is that not associating them equally? This is not an attempt to corner, just saying that you said in your statement that you don't want your kid to be falsely accused, at the same level you don't want them to be sexually assaulted, which in my opinion is the same as saying you don't want your kids to be falsely accused of murder, at the same level you don't want them to be murdered. Doesn't make much sense to me
 
Retired attorney here. It’s not a dirty trick. It’s your job as a defense attorney. It may not be pretty, and it may not seem fair to the victim, but if that’s all you’ve got you’re obligated to go there.
Therein lies the issue. We should put an emphasis on finding the truth vs winning a court case. Inherent issue in every judicial system. It's simply part of it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AgSurfer
That wasn’t how I read it. More that Kasak was the only other possible suspect because he was there at the time of the thefts. I like Kasak though, so maybe that’s coloring my interpretation. He at least cooperated with the investigation.

I think otherwise. It says only him and Carter were in the locker room during the time stuff was stolen, therefore the only possible suspects. Maybe Kasak was involved, him and Starocci appear to be close and did hang out together at times, but the article was just saying he was the other suspect. Beau only accuses Starocci though and it says Kasak talked to investigators.
That makes sense on a reread. I'm glad, I'm a Kasak fan.
 
Therein lies the issue. We should put an emphasis on finding the truth vs winning a court case. Inherent issue in every judicial system. It's simply part of it.
I agree with you.

I also assume that if there’s enough smoke to destroy livelihoods, there’s enough to bring charges. Because you walk a thin line otherwise that gives a lot of leeway to accuse people of very serious things that can destroy their lives.
 
Therein lies the issue. We should put an emphasis on finding the truth vs winning a court case. Inherent issue in every judicial system. It's simply part of it.
Not every judicial system. The US uses an adversarial system where it is winning vs. losing, other countries use other Inquisitorial systems that are more fact finding based, but defendants do not receive the same protections they get here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cali_Nittany
Iowa loses #1 recruit and gets media attention

Penn State said “hold my beer”

Absolutely disgusted and disturbed by the SA allegations, having a daughter myself.
Carters theft actions speak for themselves as well. Having the audacity to be someone that is an idol to many young children, to be taking pictures of your teammates naked and purposely touching them inappropriately is quite shocking and inexcusable. Witnessing Carter make history of being the only 5 timer was not worth it…shame on all parties involved
 
For consideration related to a 22 year old senior and a 17 year old freshman:

Can a 23 year old date a 16 year old in Pennsylvania?


www.pcar.org

Children less than 13 years old* cannot give consent to sexual activity. Teens ages 13-15 years old cannot consent to sexual activities with anyone who is 4 or more years older than them. People ages 16 years and older can legally consent to sexual activity.
 
  • Wow
Reactions: cowboyfan05
For consideration related to a 22 year old senior and a 17 year old freshman:

Can a 23 year old date a 16 year old in Pennsylvania?


www.pcar.org

Children less than 13 years old* cannot give consent to sexual activity. Teens ages 13-15 years old cannot consent to sexual activities with anyone who is 4 or more years older than them. People ages 16 years and older can legally consent to sexual activity.
This would be far more relevant has the two young women not claimed that it was not consensual.
 
Ugh, the timing of the male athlete of the year can't be any worse. They need to take that back immediately pending the results of an investigation into this mess.
Yeah, Frankly, I can’t believe it happened the way it did. Surely the PSU admin had some inkling this was coming out. Surely Evan Smith asked someone for comment before running it?

Give me Tyler Warren.
 
I think what we need to really hear from Cael and crew here is what they did and what they knew. That's what I am worried about the most.
This. I want to know what was done about the accusations. I would be very disappointed if it was not handled appropriately. Cael needs to make a statement ASAP.
 
[
Retired attorney here. It’s not a dirty trick. It’s your job as a defense attorney. It may not be pretty, and it may not seem fair to the victim, but if that’s all you’ve got you’re obligated to go there.

If the law is on your side, argue the law, if the facts are on your side, argue the facts, if neither, pound the table. At a certain point, public contempt for the bar is well-earned.


I also believe in the right to face an accuser, and I really don't understand how a former team member feels threatened, but I don't completely discount the possibility.

With that said, none of us know what if anything occurred. Numerous, varied and salacious accusations do not constitute guilt.

I'm not a big fan of innocent until proven accused in a student newspaper or social media.

Is it possible that he's a colossal, rapacious dirt-bag whose aggressive deviance knows no limits? Yeah. Is it possible that this started with Syd Bartlett and is taking on a life of its own? Yeah.

Is it possible that parts of the university resent goody-two shoes Cael, Yeah.

I've lived through the Buckley pre-school case, Anita Hill, Christine Blasey Ford-and two of those things occurred before anti-social media existed.

OTOH, I'm not at all surprised that the Epstein files remain undisclosed. My guess is that it would take down a huge swath of the political and business elite, so they'll get away with it.

Totally unrelated, but this "issue" coming out so soon after the revelations of Kyle Snyder's deviant sexual incontinence do present "reputational issues", if for no other reason-opponents will borrow from the lawyers "if that’s all you’ve got you’re obligated to go there".

Finally, If it comes out that Carter is not part of NLWC because of "character issues", and not because he's dithering about MMA and those issues were known prior to March 2024, the question will be why he was allowed to remain on the college team but unfit for NLWC. Discovery could be damning.
 
  • Love
Reactions: Ski
This. I want to know what was done about the accusations. I would be very disappointed if it was not handled appropriately. Cael needs to make a statement ASAP.
I am certain that we will hear from many PSU officials........as soon as their lawyers are finished writing their speech. I am literally sick in my stomach this morning. Feeling sad and empathetic. Such a very sad story. You know that I almost always try to be a witty smartass and hopefully funny. Not today :(
 
"Just to be very clear, at no point were any sexual assault allegations ever reported to our coaching staff or the police. The article should have clearly said that, but they were intentionally vague to mislead the reader.

The theft issue was reported and investigated by the police."

Brantt on 247
 
Therein lies the issue. We should put an emphasis on finding the truth vs winning a court case. Inherent issue in every judicial system. It's simply part of it.
Our legal system places a greater emphasis in making sure innocent people do not go to jail. While finding the truth is very important, the prosecution has to find the truth on its own unless the accused waives their Fifth Amendment rights. If finding the truth was emphasized over the possibility of a innocent person going to jail, there would be no Fifth Amendment.
 
Personally, I don't think the Daily Collegian should have published this article. There are very few facts presented. There are no investigation results. There is no confirmation that there is an investigation of sexual assault claims. There are a bunch of anonymous quotes. You really shouldn't put out something this attacking without some semblance of facts. It is pretty poor journalism.

As written, it is quite damning. I am just unsure how much is true. The whole article is based upon the claims of the Bartletts.
 
Our legal system places a greater emphasis in making sure innocent people do not go to jail. While finding the truth is very important, the prosecution has to find the truth on its own unless the accused waives their Fifth Amendment rights. If finding the truth was emphasized over the possibility of a innocent person going to jail, there would be no Fifth Amendment.
Which is the right thing to do and that's where the court of public opinion can come in.
 
"Just to be very clear, at no point were any sexual assault allegations ever reported to our coaching staff or the police. The article should have clearly said that, but they were intentionally vague to mislead the reader.

The theft issue was reported and investigated by the police."

Brantt on 247
I know you aren’t Brant (or are you? 🧐),

But I think vague does not necessarily have to be conspiratorial. Unless this author is a friend of Beau and Syd, it could just be a kid learning his craft, right?
 
"Just to be very clear, at no point were any sexual assault allegations ever reported to our coaching staff or the police. The article should have clearly said that, but they were intentionally vague to mislead the reader.

The theft issue was reported and investigated by the police."

Brantt on 247
Brantt not responding to this at all is interesting:

"Beau and Mark, a former teammate who requested anonymity due to fear of retaliation, alleged Starocci took nonconsensual explicit photos of them in the Nittany Lions’ locker room. Beau said the photos were reported to Sanderson along with the theft, but nothing came of it from the coach."
"Beau, Mark and another teammate all told the Collegian that Starocci continued to touch other wrestlers inappropriately in the training room, sometimes in front of Sanderson"
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT