Some of you are getting the threads mixed up. The only thing reported to the police was the theft. The assaults don’t factor in to that investigation.
Do we know yet that none of the assault accusations were reported to the police?
Some of you are getting the threads mixed up. The only thing reported to the police was the theft. The assaults don’t factor in to that investigation.
Yes, I agree. Attorneys use a lot of dirty tactics to try to impugn witnesses. I'm saying it's in bad faith and I was showing how it's a bad argument.“Do you think a defense attorney would use an alleged victim still working at the same place of work that the alleged assaults occurred in for several months, and introduce proof that there’s a high likelihood similar income could be found elsewhere as evidence?”
Yes, I do.
Some of the older guys posting here might remember the hit job that Woodward and Bernstein did on Nixon back in the Watergate era. After that happened, every journalism major had dreams of becoming an investigative reporter and scoring a big win by digging up dirt on well known public figures and organizations. The tone of the Collegian article makes me wonder if the author is attempting to accomplish the same.My gut tells me, there is no way in hell Cael didn't address this up the chain of command. If he didn't, I have no words after what this university has been through. Furthermore, I put zero credence in what the Daily Collegian prints. I'll wait for facts. I also don't believe Beau's words whatsoever regarding the police not being able to get in touch with Carter for 6 months. That isn't remotely believable.
I said I equally don’t want my kid accused falsely. You’re not going to take steps to corner with “wow geez if you think they’re equal crimes you do you” stuff to put me on defensive.If you associate being sexually assaulted as equal to being falsely accused of sexual assualt I don't know what to tell you.
Those posts I brought up were not "treating as innocent until proven guilty" they were outright dismissive of Beau and the potential seriousness of sexual assault allegations. This is something that, since Beau's post came out, I have been saying could be a major deal. People just brushing off allegations like these is what happened back in the day with Football and if it is proven to have happened here with the program here, it could end the greatest college sports dynasty of the 21st century. When someone brings up SA or potential SA committed by an athlete that people like, their first response is to try and dismiss it because they don't want it to be true. I am not saying people should have burned Carter at the stake once the first post came out, I am saying they should be a little slower to call out Beau or disregard it.
Do you think attorneys should not defend clients?Yes, I agree. Attorneys use a lot of dirty tactics to try to impugn witnesses. I'm saying it's in bad faith and I was showing how it's a bad argument.
Retired attorney here. It’s not a dirty trick. It’s your job as a defense attorney. It may not be pretty, and it may not seem fair to the victim, but if that’s all you’ve got you’re obligated to go there.Yes, I agree. Attorneys use a lot of dirty tactics to try to impugn witnesses. I'm saying it's in bad faith and I was showing how it's a bad argument.
Nothing I said would imply attorneys should not defend clients.Do you think attorneys should not defend clients?
You know that false accusations exist, right?
No, we do not. Why I fully expect the university to address the situation very soon. They have to at this point. However, if there had been any charges brought forth, they'd be public information.Do we know yet that none of the assault accusations were reported to the police?
If your desire not to have them falsely accused equals your desire for them not to be sexually assaulted, is that not associating them equally? This is not an attempt to corner, just saying that you said in your statement that you don't want your kid to be falsely accused, at the same level you don't want them to be sexually assaulted, which in my opinion is the same as saying you don't want your kids to be falsely accused of murder, at the same level you don't want them to be murdered. Doesn't make much sense to meI said I equally don’t want my kid accused falsely. You’re not going to take steps to corner with “wow geez if you think they’re equal crimes you do you” stuff to put me on defensive.
Therein lies the issue. We should put an emphasis on finding the truth vs winning a court case. Inherent issue in every judicial system. It's simply part of it.Retired attorney here. It’s not a dirty trick. It’s your job as a defense attorney. It may not be pretty, and it may not seem fair to the victim, but if that’s all you’ve got you’re obligated to go there.
That wasn’t how I read it. More that Kasak was the only other possible suspect because he was there at the time of the thefts. I like Kasak though, so maybe that’s coloring my interpretation. He at least cooperated with the investigation.
That makes sense on a reread. I'm glad, I'm a Kasak fan.I think otherwise. It says only him and Carter were in the locker room during the time stuff was stolen, therefore the only possible suspects. Maybe Kasak was involved, him and Starocci appear to be close and did hang out together at times, but the article was just saying he was the other suspect. Beau only accuses Starocci though and it says Kasak talked to investigators.
Just don’t impugn people with dirty tactics like pointing out that behaviors don’t match feelings of being unsafe.Nothing I said would imply attorneys should not defend clients.
I agree with you.Therein lies the issue. We should put an emphasis on finding the truth vs winning a court case. Inherent issue in every judicial system. It's simply part of it.
Not every judicial system. The US uses an adversarial system where it is winning vs. losing, other countries use other Inquisitorial systems that are more fact finding based, but defendants do not receive the same protections they get here.Therein lies the issue. We should put an emphasis on finding the truth vs winning a court case. Inherent issue in every judicial system. It's simply part of it.
What about murder and arson? Have you *always* supported them? 🧐Nothing I said would imply attorneys should not defend clients
This would be far more relevant has the two young women not claimed that it was not consensual.For consideration related to a 22 year old senior and a 17 year old freshman:
Can a 23 year old date a 16 year old in Pennsylvania?
www.pcar.org
Children less than 13 years old* cannot give consent to sexual activity. Teens ages 13-15 years old cannot consent to sexual activities with anyone who is 4 or more years older than them. People ages 16 years and older can legally consent to sexual activity.
Yeah, Frankly, I can’t believe it happened the way it did. Surely the PSU admin had some inkling this was coming out. Surely Evan Smith asked someone for comment before running it?Ugh, the timing of the male athlete of the year can't be any worse. They need to take that back immediately pending the results of an investigation into this mess.
Time for a new poll: 😀Obviously Carter is done at PSU/NLWC, but honestly hoping Cael doesn't get fired over this.
This. I want to know what was done about the accusations. I would be very disappointed if it was not handled appropriately. Cael needs to make a statement ASAP.I think what we need to really hear from Cael and crew here is what they did and what they knew. That's what I am worried about the most.
Retired attorney here. It’s not a dirty trick. It’s your job as a defense attorney. It may not be pretty, and it may not seem fair to the victim, but if that’s all you’ve got you’re obligated to go there.
I am certain that we will hear from many PSU officials........as soon as their lawyers are finished writing their speech. I am literally sick in my stomach this morning. Feeling sad and empathetic. Such a very sad story. You know that I almost always try to be a witty smartass and hopefully funny. Not todayThis. I want to know what was done about the accusations. I would be very disappointed if it was not handled appropriately. Cael needs to make a statement ASAP.
Our legal system places a greater emphasis in making sure innocent people do not go to jail. While finding the truth is very important, the prosecution has to find the truth on its own unless the accused waives their Fifth Amendment rights. If finding the truth was emphasized over the possibility of a innocent person going to jail, there would be no Fifth Amendment.Therein lies the issue. We should put an emphasis on finding the truth vs winning a court case. Inherent issue in every judicial system. It's simply part of it.
Which is the right thing to do and that's where the court of public opinion can come in.Our legal system places a greater emphasis in making sure innocent people do not go to jail. While finding the truth is very important, the prosecution has to find the truth on its own unless the accused waives their Fifth Amendment rights. If finding the truth was emphasized over the possibility of a innocent person going to jail, there would be no Fifth Amendment.
I know you aren’t Brant (or are you? 🧐),"Just to be very clear, at no point were any sexual assault allegations ever reported to our coaching staff or the police. The article should have clearly said that, but they were intentionally vague to mislead the reader.
The theft issue was reported and investigated by the police."
Brantt on 247
Brantt not responding to this at all is interesting:"Just to be very clear, at no point were any sexual assault allegations ever reported to our coaching staff or the police. The article should have clearly said that, but they were intentionally vague to mislead the reader.
The theft issue was reported and investigated by the police."
Brantt on 247
Your larger point is taken, but there are quotes from victims of the alleged SA there too. Anonymous, true, but not wholly ignorable.The whole article is based upon the claims of the Bartletts.