My mom was a huge football fan and could go toe-to-toe with just about anyone on strategy. She could tell you when you'd run a draw versus a screen to offset the defense's rush. But she never played the game, so she would often watch the Steelers play a poor game and exclaim, "Why don't they try harder?" This isn't golf or track. Other teams have defenses and many of those are pretty damned smart. At the same time, while the QB is clearly the most important poison in college football, he heavily relies on the other 10 people.....21 + if you consider CJF's "situational football".PSU has won 34 games in the last three seasons; the staff must be paying some attention to detail.
One of the things about football is how complex it is. In terms of both logic and emotion. So I do wonder why Allar would be considered good at drop back but not play-action. Or, that he can drill the TE but can't complete wide open passes to WRs. It is either a lack of confidence or a lack of trust. Probably a little of both. I think the staff tried like hell to compete passes to WRs early in the season. But by the time we got into the meat of the schedule and in the playoffs, we played to win no matter how we won. In the end, the WR completions never developed. But I think the least of the problem is Allar because, as I've said, the kid had one of the best completion percentages in all of college football for the regular season. Why not WRs? My guess is that it was minimally him. I think the WRs were either lazy or were easily run off their routes. That caused Allar to have to throw late (once he SAW the break because he couldn't anticipate it). That, then, caused him to be late with his secondary and tertiary reads.