Yes. But as I said, not the seeding.Laughable, this system as currently oriented gave two teams outside the top 8 by the Final CFP Selection Rankings byes in the 1st RD (#12 and #9)! It required two teams ranked top 4 by the Final CFP Selection Rankings to play in the 1st RD (#3 Texas and #4 PSU)! It replaced the #11 ranked team in the Final CFP Selection Rankings with the #16 Team! And you claim this is a good system??? It's a ridiculously stupid and grossly inequitable "playoff" system. Out of one side of your mouth you say #1 v #16 @home, #2 v #15 @home, #3 v #14 @home and #4 v #13 @home are easy wins for the higher seeds especially with home-field advantage, so what on earth could be your problem with letting them play???? (It does not extend the playoff a single day) - you actually imply that #5 v #12 @home, #6 v #11 @home and #7 v #10 @home are easy wins for higher ranked team.... Keep in mind, this is ABSOLUTELY NOT what this absurd system gave us in the 1st RD! Using the actual Final CFP Selection Rankings, this system gave us #3 v #16, #4 v #10, #5 v #8 and #6 v #7 at the home of higher ranked team in the 1st RD???? It also put the #12 and #9 Selection Ranked teams into the 2nd RD without playing a game???? It eliminated the #11 Selection Ranked team without playing a game???? And due to it's beyond absurd 12-Team Re-Seeding System (it reseeded the Selection Rankings/Seeding
Funny how almost your entire post complains about seeding and I said seeding needs revisited.